Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Tune: A Research Platform for Distributed Model Selection and Training

Published 13 Jul 2018 in cs.LG, cs.DC, and stat.ML | (1807.05118v1)

Abstract: Modern machine learning algorithms are increasingly computationally demanding, requiring specialized hardware and distributed computation to achieve high performance in a reasonable time frame. Many hyperparameter search algorithms have been proposed for improving the efficiency of model selection, however their adaptation to the distributed compute environment is often ad-hoc. We propose Tune, a unified framework for model selection and training that provides a narrow-waist interface between training scripts and search algorithms. We show that this interface meets the requirements for a broad range of hyperparameter search algorithms, allows straightforward scaling of search to large clusters, and simplifies algorithm implementation. We demonstrate the implementation of several state-of-the-art hyperparameter search algorithms in Tune. Tune is available at http://ray.readthedocs.io/en/latest/tune.html.

Citations (803)

Summary

  • The paper provides detailed instructions on setting up the jmlr LaTeX class for workshop and conference submissions.
  • It emphasizes avoiding deprecated commands and outdated packages to ensure compatibility with modern LaTeX systems.
  • The guide offers practical tips and resource references, streamlining manuscript preparation and enhancing reproducibility in academic publishing.

Overview of the Article on LaTeX Class Usage for ICML 2016 AutoML Workshop

The paper presented at the ICML 2016 AutoML Workshop offers an insightful guide on utilizing the jmlr LaTeX class, specifically tailored with the wcp (Workshop and Conference Proceedings) class option. Authored by [Author Name1] and [Author Name2], this document serves as a template and instructional piece for researchers aiming to prepare their manuscripts for submission to the Journal of Machine Learning Research (JMLR) within the context of workshops and conferences.

Motivation and Context

The introduction of this paper underscores the necessity of adhering to contemporary LaTeX standards and avoiding deprecated commands and packages. A notable mention is the recommendation against using obsolete commands like \rm and outdated packages such as epsfig. The motivation stems from ensuring that submissions are compatible with modern LaTeX systems, thereby streamlining the editorial and publishing process.

Methodological Instructions

The document is structured to function both as an exemplar and a concise manual. It provides:

  1. LaTeX Class Configuration: Guidelines on compiling the document using PDFLaTeX, with instructions tailored to mitigate common LaTeX errors encountered during compilation.
  2. Resource References: Directives are provided for troubleshooting and optimizing LaTeX usage, including references to the UK TUG FAQ and advisory on utilizing community forums like TeX on StackExchange for problem-solving.

Practical Implications

For researchers in machine learning, particularly those contributing to conferences and workshops, adopting the guidelines proposed in this document could significantly enhance the quality and consistency of submissions. By adhering to the standardized formatting and utilizing current LaTeX packages, authors can ensure their work is presented professionally, increasing the likelihood of acceptance and simplification of the editorial workflow.

Discussion and Future Directions

The implications of adopting standardized LaTeX class files extend beyond mere aesthetics; they promote reproducibility and clarity in scholarly communication. This paper serves as a model, yet it implicitly calls for ongoing updates to LaTeX templates to align with emerging standards and tools. Future developments could include automated validation tools for LaTeX submissions, ensuring compliance with formatting standards prior to submission.

In sum, while this paper itself functions as a practical guide rather than presenting novel research findings, its utility in the academic community is nontrivial. By fostering adherence to current LaTeX conventions, it supports the goal of maintaining high standards in academic publishing.

Conclusion

This article is instrumental for researchers preparing for the ICML AutoML Workshop and similar academic events, providing a robust framework for LaTeX document preparation. The foresight in addressing LaTeX versioning issues and offering practical resources positions the paper as a cornerstone for effective scholarly communication in machine learning research communities.

Paper to Video (Beta)

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.