Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
119 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
56 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
6 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Deep TAMER: Interactive Agent Shaping in High-Dimensional State Spaces (1709.10163v2)

Published 28 Sep 2017 in cs.AI and cs.LG

Abstract: While recent advances in deep reinforcement learning have allowed autonomous learning agents to succeed at a variety of complex tasks, existing algorithms generally require a lot of training data. One way to increase the speed at which agents are able to learn to perform tasks is by leveraging the input of human trainers. Although such input can take many forms, real-time, scalar-valued feedback is especially useful in situations where it proves difficult or impossible for humans to provide expert demonstrations. Previous approaches have shown the usefulness of human input provided in this fashion (e.g., the TAMER framework), but they have thus far not considered high-dimensional state spaces or employed the use of deep learning. In this paper, we do both: we propose Deep TAMER, an extension of the TAMER framework that leverages the representational power of deep neural networks in order to learn complex tasks in just a short amount of time with a human trainer. We demonstrate Deep TAMER's success by using it and just 15 minutes of human-provided feedback to train an agent that performs better than humans on the Atari game of Bowling - a task that has proven difficult for even state-of-the-art reinforcement learning methods.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (4)
  1. Garrett Warnell (47 papers)
  2. Nicholas Waytowich (26 papers)
  3. Vernon Lawhern (8 papers)
  4. Peter Stone (184 papers)
Citations (250)

Summary

Analysis of AAAI 2018 LaTeX Formatting Instructions

The paper "2018 Formatting Instructions for Authors Using LaTeX" published by the Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AAAI) serves as a comprehensive guide for authors preparing their manuscripts for submission to AAAI-affiliated proceedings and technical reports. The document delineates meticulous guidelines to ensure uniformity and compatibility across all submissions, focusing primarily on the usage of LaTeX—a powerful typesetting system favored in academic and scientific publishing.

Overview of LaTeX Requirements

The document provides explicit instructions for LaTeX users, emphasizing that adherence to these guidelines is critical for successful paper submission and publication. The AAAI mandates the use of specific LaTeX style files (most notably aaai.sty) to control document formatting, including text layout, font types, and sizes. The authors are required to format their manuscripts to conform to US letter-size paper with strict adherence to predefined margins, column widths, and typefaces. The document underscores the importance of using PDFLaTeX for compiling the final PDF to avoid common pitfalls associated with other compilation methods and to ensure that type 1 fonts are used exclusively.

Key Specifications and Compliance

The guidelines detail the essential steps for preparing a manuscript, including the structure of the document preamble, the insertion of metadata, and the overall organization of the paper. A particular focus is placed on the non-manipulation of style files and the prohibition of certain LaTeX commands and packages that could disrupt the standardized formatting. These include commands that alter spacing, floats, margins, or the presentation of references and citations, as well as the use of packages like hyperref and natbib that are incompatible with the AAAI’s style file.

Additionally, the paper highlights the obligatory nature of submitting signed copyright forms and the penalties for failing to provide properly formatted submissions. Authors are advised that improperly formatted files submitted to AAAI could incur significant reformatting fees or even result in the exclusion from the proceedings.

Implications for Authors and Conferences

From a practical standpoint, the thoroughness of this document indicates a focus on creating a streamlined editorial and production process by minimizing errors and reducing the need for post-submission corrections. The emphasis on standardized formatting allows for the efficient handling of a large volume of submissions typical in AAAI conferences, which is beneficial both for the conference organizers and the contributing authors.

Theoretically, the detailed instructions underscore the importance of maintaining consistency and quality in academic publications. By enforcing strict guidelines, AAAI aims to ensure that research works presented at their conferences are not only of high intellectual merit but also of a professional standard in their presentation.

Speculations on Future Developments

As AI research continues to evolve, the necessity for coherent and precise dissemination of findings becomes paramount. Future developments might include even more sophisticated LaTeX templates and tools to ease authors’ compliance with formatting guidelines, potentially leveraging AI technologies to automate parts of the formatting process.

Additionally, concerted efforts could be directed toward enhancing accessibility and integration with digital dissemination platforms, ensuring that research is both readily consumable and archivable. The increasing participation in AI research globally may also prompt AAAI to consider guidelines that accommodate a broader range of LaTeX environments and workflows without compromising on consistency and quality.

In conclusion, "2018 Formatting Instructions for Authors Using LaTeX" provides a critical framework for authors contributing to the AAAI's extensive array of publications, ensuring that all submissions meet the high standards expected in the dissemination of scientific research. The emphasis on adherence to strict formatting requirements reflects AAAI's commitment to maintaining consistency, readability, and professionalism across its published materials.