Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Assistant
AI Research Assistant
Well-researched responses based on relevant abstracts and paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 63 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 50 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 19 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 29 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 101 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 212 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 438 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.5 36 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Cosmic opacity: cosmological-model-independent tests and their impacts on cosmic acceleration (1304.7317v2)

Published 27 Apr 2013 in astro-ph.CO and gr-qc

Abstract: With assumptions that the violation of the distance-duality (DD) relation entirely arises from non-conservation of the photon number and the absorption is frequency independent in the observed frequency range, we perform cosmological-model-independent tests for the cosmic opacity. The observational data include the largest Union2.1 SN Ia sample, which is taken for observed $D_\mathrm{L}$, and galaxy cluster samples compiled by De Filippis {\it et al.} and Bonamente {\it et al.}, which are responsible for providing observed $D_\mathrm{A}$. Two parameterizations, $\tau(z)=2\epsilon z$ and $\tau(z)=(1+z){2\epsilon}-1$ are adopted for the optical depth associated to the cosmic absorption. We find that, an almost transparent universe is favored by Filippis {\it et al.} sample but it is only marginally accommodated by Bonomente {\it et al.} samples at 95.4% confidence level (C. L.) (even at 99.7% C. L. when the $r<100 \mathrm{kpc}$-cut spherical $\beta$ model is considered). Taking the possible cosmic absorption (in 68.3% C. L. range) constrained from the model-independent tests into consideration, we correct the distance modulus of SNe Ia and then use them to study their cosmological implications. The constraints on the $\Lambda$CDM show that a decelerating expanding universe with $\Omega_\Lambda=0$ is only allowed at 99.7% C. L. by observations when the Bonamente {\it et al.} sample is considered. Therefore, our analysis suggests that an accelerated cosmic expansion is still needed to account for the dimming of SNe and the standard cosmological scenario remains to be supported by current observations.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Lightbulb Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Don't miss out on important new AI/ML research

See which papers are being discussed right now on X, Reddit, and more:

“Emergent Mind helps me see which AI papers have caught fire online.”

Philip

Philip

Creator, AI Explained on YouTube