Establish whether CLEAR-DC fulfills its intended integrated objectives
Establish whether CLEAR-DC, the proposed Closed-Loop Energy Accounting and Reporting for Data Centers framework, can simultaneously provide joint optimization, safety guarantees, resource breadth, optimizer–load loop closure, and validation beyond simulation when it is built, trained, and benchmarked.
References
The curtailment simulation in §\ref{sec:exploit} uses the same power-throughput curves used to measure PFI; validation on out-of-sample workloads is left to future work with a larger dataset.
Closed-loop scheduler validation of §\ref{sec:exploit} and extensions to other accelerators (including heterogeneous clusters), RLHF, and inference are left to future work.
No method in Table~\ref{tab:related_work_comparison} holds all five properties at once: joint optimisation, safety guarantees, resource breadth, loop closure, and evidence from outside a simulator. CLEAR-DC is drawn to fill that empty cell. We do not claim it succeeds in doing so; settling that requires building it.