Tightness of the conditional-dependence converse bound

Determine whether the single-letter upper bound E(R) ≤ \tilde{E}(R) is tight for testing against conditional dependence when the transmitter observes X^n but not the side-information sequence Z^n, beyond the special case in which Z is a deterministic function of X.

Background

The paper studies testing against conditional dependence, in which the receiver observes Yn and Zn while the transmitter observes only Xn. Under the null hypothesis, the joint distribution is P_{XZ}P_{Y|Z}; under the alternative, it is Q_{XYZ}.

By introducing a related conditional-testing-against-dependence problem in which Zn is available to both transmitter and receiver, the paper derives the single-letter exponent \tilde{E}(R). For the original problem, where Zn is unavailable to the transmitter, this yields only the converse bound E(R) ≤ \tilde{E}(R). The paper proves equality when Z is a function of X, because the transmitter can then reconstruct Zn, but leaves the tightness question unresolved in the general case.

References

It thus remains to determine whether our upper bound is tight.

Distributed Hypothesis Testing Against Dependence  (2608.24403 - Wu et al., 25 Aug 2026) in Section 1, subsection “Testing Against Dependence and Related Problems” (also discussed in Section 3.3, subsection “Testing Against Conditional Dependence”)