Develop conditional independence inference for the conditional binomial-cut coefficient

Develop a valid inference procedure for the conditional binomial-cut coefficient \(\xi_{\mathrm{cut}}^{\mid Z}(X,Y)\) under the conditional-independence null hypothesis \(H_0:X\perp Y\mid Z\), using a conditional-randomization scheme rather than ordinary permutation, and establish the full conditional-testing framework.

Background

The paper defines a conditional variant, ξcut∣Z(X,Y)=2∫EX,Z[ϕ(F(t∣X,Z),F(t∣Z))]dF(t∣Z)\xi_{\mathrm{cut}}^{\mid Z}(X,Y)=2\int E_{X,Z}[\phi(F(t\mid X,Z),F(t\mid Z))]dF(t\mid Z), to measure residual dependence between XX and YY after adjustment for covariates ZZ. Unlike the unconditional null, the conditional null X⊥Y∣ZX\perp Y\mid Z cannot generally be calibrated by freely permuting YY, because ordinary permutation destroys the association between YY and ZZ.

The paper therefore identifies the development of conditional-randomization or conditional-permutation inference for this coefficient as unresolved. Such a procedure would provide valid calibration for testing conditional independence while accounting for the kernel smoothing over ZZ.

References

Inference for the conditional null H_0: X \indep Y \mid Z requires a conditional-randomization scheme rather than ordinary permutation \citep{candes2018panning}; we mention this variant here as a natural extension and defer full development to future work.

— A likelihood-based coefficient for biomedical independence testing: the binomial-cut composite likelihood ratio  (2609.31467 - Qin, 25 Sep 2026) in Section 4.5, Subsection “Conditional variant”; also Web Appendix C, Remark “Scope of the exactness result”