Interpretive basis for referring to specific persons in AI accuracy provisions

Determine why the EU AI Act's accuracy provisions refer to specific persons, particularly given that providers must document compliance before a high-risk AI system is placed on the market or put into service.

Background

The EU AI Act requires information about accuracy and performance concerning specific persons or groups of persons on whom a high-risk AI system is intended to be used. The paper notes a tension between these individual-oriented requirements and the statistical, aggregate nature of machine-learning systems.

The authors explicitly state that the rationale for referring to specific persons is unresolved, especially because the relevant accuracy information may be required ex ante, before the system has been deployed and before evidence about particular individuals exists.

References

However, it is unclear why the provisions refer to specific persons -- especially considering that providers must comply with the provision before the AI system has been brought to market or put into service.

Law of Large Numbers: Accuracy as Statistical Measure for AI Compliance and Competition  (2608.31018 - Derr et al., 31 Aug 2026) in Appendix L, subsection "L-accuracy exists to protect subgroups and individuals"