Governance-Driven Logging, Transparency, and Human Oversight
Identify which logging, transparency, and human-oversight affordances coding-agent architectures should expose to satisfy emerging governance and regulatory obligations such as the EU AI Act and the GPAI Code of Practice.
References
Which logging, transparency, and human-oversight affordances coding-agent architectures should expose under that external constraint remains an open design question.
RGE tracks that relation online without an end-to-end LLM verdict, leaving open what evidence interfaces future agent environments should expose to make closure, authorization, and surplus action monitorable.
The substantive question this raises---which the framework leaves open---is which reasons of which agents a system ought to track.
Whether or not the impermissibility result under our framework also implies a violation of Article 14 AI Act must remain an open question. Article 14(3) AI Act demands oversight measures to be commensurate with the risks, level of autonomy, and context of use of the high-risk AI system. An answer can thus only be found on a case-by-case basis.