Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Second-order Replacement and Collection for H(X) in ZF

Ascertain whether, for an arbitrary set X, the class H(X) (defined as the union of all transitive sets M that are surjective images of some S ∈ X) satisfies Second-order Replacement and Second-order Collection in ZF; establish general conditions under which these axioms hold or fail for H(X).

Information Square Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Background

The paper discusses several choiceless definitions of H(X) and proves that H(X) is always a set in ZF, with basic closure properties yielding a model of Second-order Zermelo set theory under mild hypotheses. However, the status of Second-order Replacement and Collection for H(X) is left unresolved in general, and examples indicate that Collection may fail even when Replacement holds in choiceless contexts.

References

We do not know if H(X) satisfies Second-order Replacement or Collection in general: Working in ZFC, M = H({\omega_n\mid n<\omega}) = {x : \lverttrcl(x)\rvert < \omega_\omega} thinks each \omega_n is in M, but \omega_n\mid n<\omega\notin M.

On a cofinal Reinhardt embedding without Powerset (2406.10698 - Jeon, 15 Jun 2024) in Section 2.2 (H_λ and H(X))