Relaxing the derivative-access and slow-variation assumptions

Determine whether the derivative-oracle and slow-analytic assumptions used for simulating time-dependent Hamiltonians can be relaxed while preserving the same or better gate efficiency, including whether standard HAM-T access alone can replace derivative oracles, whether the required periodic extension can be constructed directly from coherent evaluations of the Hamiltonian, and whether the slow condition can be replaced by a more flexible measure of temporal variation.

Background

The paper’s nearly additive query complexity with polylogarithmic precision-dependent gate overhead relies on a slow analytic Hamiltonian representation and, in the general case, coherent access to the derivative together with high-order endpoint derivatives. The discussion identifies relaxing these assumptions as an immediate open direction.

The authors specifically mention replacing derivative access by standard HAM-T access, constructing the periodic extension from coherent evaluations of the Hamiltonian, and replacing the rescaled-time condition by a measure based on temporal variation. These questions concern whether the algorithm’s gate-efficiency advantages can survive under more standard or flexible input models.

References

An immediate open question is whether these assumptions can be relaxed while achieving the same or better gate efficiency. In particular, it would be desirable to replace the derivative oracles by standard HAM-T access alone, or to construct the required periodic extension directly from coherent evaluations of $H(s)$.

Quantum simulation of slow analytic time-dependent Hamiltonians  (2608.17653 - Zhao et al., 18 Aug 2026) in Section 1, subsection “Discussion”

More fundamentally, it remains open whether general Lipschitz-continuous Hamiltonians admit both optimal query complexity and additional gate complexity that is only polylogarithmic in $1/\varepsilon$.

Quantum simulation of slow analytic time-dependent Hamiltonians  (2608.17653 - Zhao et al., 18 Aug 2026) in Section 1, subsection “Discussion”