Precise identification of SIC-generated subfields with ray class fields
Prove that, for any fiducial datum \(s=(d,r,Q,G,g)\) and associated admissible tuple \(t=(d,r,Q)\), the following equalities hold: (1) \(E_s^{(1)} = H^{\mathcal{O}_f}_{\bar{d}\,\infty_1}\); (2) \(E_t^{(2)} = H^{\mathcal{O}_f}_{\bar{d}\,\infty_2}\); (3) \(E_t = H^{\mathcal{O}_f}_{\bar{d}\,\infty_1\,\infty_2}\).
References
Let s=(d,r,Q,G,g)\sim(K,j,m,Q,G,g) be a fiducial datum, let t=(d,r,Q)\sim(K,j,m,Q), and let d=d_{j,m}. Suppose that \disc(Q) is fundamental. Choose \p_1 = \smcoltwo{p_{11}{p_{12}} such that (p_{12}\rho_t-p_{11})\OO_1 is coprime to d\OO_1 as \OO_1-ideals. (1) The ray class field H{\OO_1}_{d\infty_1} is equal to the field extension of K generated by the numbers {\overlap_s(\mbf{p}) : 0\le p_1,p_2 < d, \mbf{p}\neq 0} and is also equal to \Q(\overlap_s(\p_1)2). (2) The ray class field H{\OO_1}_{d\infty_2} is equal to the field extension of K generated by the numbers {\tilde\mu_t(\mbf{p})2 : 0\le p_1,p_2 < d, \mbf{p}\neq 0} and is also equal to \Q(\tilde\mu_t(\p_1)2). (3) The ray class field H{\OO_1}_{\bar{d}\infty_1\infty_2} is equal to the field extension of K generated by the numbers {\tilde\mu_t(\mbf{p})2 : 0\le p_1,p_2 < d, \mbf{p}\neq 0} together with \xi_d.