Prove necessity of exactness for out-of-distribution generalization

Prove that exactness of the representation consulted at inference is necessary for out-of-distribution generalization, rather than merely establishing that exactness predicts observed successes and failures better than architecture, capacity, data, or scale.

Background

The paper proposes a representational criterion according to which a system generalizes out of distribution only when the representation used at inference is structurally equivalent to the underlying data-generating mechanism. The authors apply this criterion to piecewise-affine extrapolation, relational binding, hybrid architectures, neuro-symbolic systems, and epistemic uncertainty.

However, the authors explicitly characterize the criterion as an argument rather than a theorem. Establishing necessity would require a formal result ruling out out-of-distribution generalization by a fitted, structurally nonequivalent approximation under the relevant assumptions, rather than relying on the empirical and conceptual evidence presented in the paper.

References

Our criterion is not a theorem. We have not proved that exactness is necessary for OOD generalization; we have argued that it predicts the observed pattern of successes and failures better than Neural Network architecture, capacity, data, or scale, and that it sorts neuro-symbolic systems in a way their surface taxonomy \citep{kautz2022third} does not.

— Exactness at Inference: A Representational Criterion for Out-of-Distribution Generalization  (2609.24942 - Rocha et al., 21 Sep 2026) in Section 10, “Scope, Limitations, and Refutation Conditions” (Section \ref{sec:limits})