Principled volume control for distance-based log-sum-exp objectives

Develop a principled mechanism for volume control in neural training under distance-based log-sum-exp objectives by either deriving implicit covariance-volume terms from architectural components or designing objectives that include explicit log-determinant-like penalties, in order to prevent collapse of the learned metric during implicit expectation-maximization dynamics.

Background

The paper highlights a collapse risk inherent to distance-based objectives optimized with softmax/log-sum-exp: unlike Gaussian mixture models that include a log-determinant term to penalize shrinking component volumes, standard neural losses lack explicit volume control. This absence can allow a component (or metric) to degenerate, capturing probability mass through positive feedback in responsibility-weighted updates.

The authors note that practical training often relies on heuristic stabilizers (e.g., weight decay, normalization layers), but these are not principled replacements for a theoretically motivated volume term. A formal approach to embedding volume control in the objective or deriving it from architectural elements would make the implicit EM dynamics more robust and theoretically grounded.

References

Several directions remain open. The absence of volume control in neural objectives---the missing log-determinant---leads to collapse risks that are currently managed by heuristics. A principled approach would either derive implicit volume terms from architectural choices or design objectives that include them explicitly.

Gradient Descent as Implicit EM in Distance-Based Neural Models  (2512.24780 - Oursland, 31 Dec 2025) in Discussion, Open Directions (Section 7, Open Directions)