Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Positivity and asymptotics for the smallest positive zero of E_{α,α}(-z^α)

Establish the conjectured properties of the two-parameter Mittag-Leffler function E_{α,α} evaluated at −z^α for α in (1,2]: specifically, prove that E_{α,α}(−z^α) > 0 for all z in [0, 2.93785]; and determine the asymptotic behavior of Z_{α}(α), defined as the smallest positive real number z such that E_{α,α}(−z^α) = 0, namely Z_{α}(α) = (c ln(α − 1) + d)(1 + o(1)) as α → 1+ with constants c ≈ −0.81 and d ≈ 2.25, and Z_{α}(α) = π + c(2 − α) + o(2 − α) as α → 2− with c ≈ −0.81.

Information Square Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Background

Section 3 motivates the need for quantitative knowledge of small positive zeros of E_{α,β}(−zα) because the separation results (Section 2) rely on choosing T* so that certain Mittag-Leffler kernels remain positive. For β = α, the authors computed numerical evidence for the smallest positive zero Z_{α}(α) and observed non-monotonic dependence on α.

Based on these observations, they formulate a conjecture combining a uniform positivity claim on [0, 2.93785] for all α ∈ (1,2] and two asymptotic regimes of Z_{α}(α) near α → 1+ and α → 2−, with approximate constants inferred from computations. Proving these assertions would directly strengthen the applicability of their separation theorems by certifying the positivity intervals analytically.

References

The observations obtained in this way give rise to the following conjecture. (a) For any α ∈ (1,2], the statement E_{α, α}(−zα) > 0 holds for all z ∈ [0, 2.93785]. (b) For α → 1+, we have Z_α(α) = (c ln(α−1) + d) (1 + o(1)) with c ≈ −0.81 and d ≈ 2.25. (c) For α → 2−, we have Z_α(α) = π + c (2 − α) + o(2 − α) with c ≈ −0.81.

On the separation of solutions to fractional differential equations of order $α\in (1,2)$ (2401.14771 - Chaudhary et al., 26 Jan 2024) in Section 3.1 (Small positive zeros of z ↦ E_{α,α}(−z^α))