Mechanism linking interface piezoelectricity to aluminum’s superconducting transition

Determine the microscopic mechanism that links the observed rapid enhancement of the interface piezoelectric transduction at the aluminum–silicon interface near T ≈ 1.2 K to the superconducting phase transition of aluminum. Specifically, establish how the superconducting transition of aluminum affects the interfacial electromechanical coupling quantified by the microwave transmission coefficient ratio Δ|S21,0| = |S21,0^Si| / |S21,0^AlN| measured for aluminum-on-silicon interdigital transducers relative to aluminum-on-aluminum nitride controls.

Background

To probe temperature dependence, the authors compare aluminum-on-silicon interdigital transducers (IDTs) to aluminum-on-aluminum nitride controls, defining Δ|S21,0| = |S21,0Si|/|S21,0AlN| to factor out calibration uncertainties and capture the interface piezoelectric response. The ratio shows a non-monotonic temperature dependence and exhibits a rapid enhancement around T = 1.2 K, coincident with the superconducting transition temperature of aluminum.

Understanding the microscopic origin of this enhancement is important because the paper establishes interface piezoelectricity as a significant, linear dissipation channel for superconducting qubits on silicon, with predicted quality-factor limits comparable to state-of-the-art devices. Clarifying the mechanism would inform both accurate modeling of electromechanical surface losses and strategies for materials and phononic engineering to mitigate qubit decoherence.

References

An interesting observation is that Δ |S_{21}| shows a rapid enhancement at around T = 1.2 K, coinciding with the aluminum's superconducting phase transition temperature (Fig. 2d). This suggests a potential link between interface piezoelectricity and aluminum's superconducting transition, though the mechanism remains unclear.

Observation of Interface Piezoelectricity in Superconducting Devices on Silicon  (2409.10626 - Zhou et al., 2024) in Subsection “Interface Piezoelectricity at Millikelvin Temperatures,” Fig. 2d (main text)