Kessar–Schaps crossing conjecture in the opposite-sign case

Establish the Kessar–Schaps crossing conjecture for spin $p$-blocks labeled by $p$-bar cores $kappa$ and $kappa'$ satisfying $\operatorname{sgn}(\kappa)=1$ and $\operatorname{sgn}(\kappa')=-1$, including the corresponding perfect-isometry assertion beyond the weaker form previously proved.

Background

The paper studies perfect isometries and Galois–Navarro equivariance for spin pp-blocks of double covering groups of symmetric and alternating groups. In the crossing case with sgn(κ)=1\operatorname{sgn}(\kappa)=-1 and sgn(κ)=1\operatorname{sgn}(\kappa')=1, the authors prove an H\mathcal H-equivariant correspondence under a compatibility condition on the Galois signs of the two cores.

The opposite crossing orientation, with sgn(κ)=1\operatorname{sgn}(\kappa)=1 and sgn(κ)=1\operatorname{sgn}(\kappa')=-1, is not covered by the equivariance theorem: the perfect isometry constructed in the cited prior work fails to commute with the action of H\mathcal H. The paper identifies an additional factor (1)(p1)/2(-1)^{(p-1)/2} in this case, while the underlying Kessar–Schaps crossing conjecture is described as including these cases; thus the full conjectural statement remains beyond the results established here.

References

Note that the Kessar–Schaps crossing conjecture, whose weaker form is proved in , also includes the cases where $sgn(\kappa) = 1$ and $sgn(\kappa') = -1$. Surprisingly, the perfect isometry constructed in in this setting does not commute with the action of $\mathcal H$.

Galois Automorphisms And Littlewood Decompositions  (2509.13264 - Brunat et al., 16 Sep 2025) in Remark \ref{rk:fails}, Section 5.4 (The crossing case)