Sufficiency of individual versus collections of DIGP maps for inverse scattering
Determine whether an individual double-indexed geometric-phase (DIGP) map for a fixed index pair $(p,q)$ is sufficient for inverse-scattering problems, or whether a collection of DIGP maps generated from multiple $(p,q)$ pairs and the same polarimetric measurements is required.
References
Should an individual DIGP map for a specific $(p,q)$ pair suffice for inverse-scattering problems or will a collection of DIGP maps for diverse $(p,q)$ pairs, all calculated from the same set of polarimetric measurements, be needed? Although the real answer(s) to that question will require further research, a preliminary indication was provided by a principal component analysis (PCA) of the DIGP maps in Figs.~\ref{CSTF-ref}, \ref{CSTF-tra}, \ref{CSTF-twist-ref}, \ref{CSTF-twist-tra}, \ref{AChevSTF-ref}, \ref{AChevSTF-tra}, \ref{AChevSTF-twist-ref}, \ref{AChevSTF-twist-tra}, and \ref{sphere-DIGP}.