Sufficiency of individual versus collections of DIGP maps for inverse scattering

Determine whether an individual double-indexed geometric-phase (DIGP) map for a fixed index pair $(p,q)$ is sufficient for inverse-scattering problems, or whether a collection of DIGP maps generated from multiple $(p,q)$ pairs and the same polarimetric measurements is required.

Background

The paper introduces the double-indexed geometric phase (DIGP) as a family of polarization-state observables parameterized by real indices pp and qq. For thin films and three-dimensional scattering objects, the authors compute multiple DIGP maps from the same underlying polarimetric data and suggest that these maps may support inverse retrieval of morphological and electromagnetic parameters.

The unresolved issue is whether one DIGP map, corresponding to a single (p,q)(p,q) pair, contains enough information for reliable inverse scattering, or whether several maps are needed. A preliminary principal component analysis indicates substantial redundancy among collections of DIGP maps, but the analysis does not establish the minimum sufficient collection or settle whether an individual map can provide robust parameter retrieval.

References

Should an individual DIGP map for a specific $(p,q)$ pair suffice for inverse-scattering problems or will a collection of DIGP maps for diverse $(p,q)$ pairs, all calculated from the same set of polarimetric measurements, be needed? Although the real answer(s) to that question will require further research, a preliminary indication was provided by a principal component analysis (PCA) of the DIGP maps in Figs.~\ref{CSTF-ref}, \ref{CSTF-tra}, \ref{CSTF-twist-ref}, \ref{CSTF-twist-tra}, \ref{AChevSTF-ref}, \ref{AChevSTF-tra}, \ref{AChevSTF-twist-ref}, \ref{AChevSTF-twist-tra}, and \ref{sphere-DIGP}.

— The double-indexed geometric phase for electromagnetics  (2608.25409 - Lakhtakia et al., 26 Aug 2026) in Section “Individual DIGP maps or collections of DIGP maps?” (subsection label: PCA)