Improved bounds for the graph parameter ell(p,q)
Determine better bounds on the minimum integer ℓ(p,q) such that every graph of sufficiently large treewidth contains pairwise disjoint connected subgraphs of treewidth at least p whose simultaneous contraction yields a minor of treewidth at least q, with particular attention to the proposed bound ℓ(p,q) ∈ O*(pq).
References
Our second open problem is inspired by the proof of \cref{key}, which implicitly relies on the following fact: For any integers $p,q 1$ there is a minimum integer $\ell(p,q)$ such that for any graph $G$ with treewidth at least $\ell(p,q)$:
\begin{enumerate}[(a)]
\item there are pairwise disjoint connected subgraphs $G_1,G_2,\dots,G_n$ such that $\tw(G_i) p$ for each $i\in{1,\dots,n}$, and
\item contracting each of $G_1,\dots,G_n$ to a vertex gives a minor of $G$ with treewidth at least $q$.
\end{enumerate}
We claim that $\ell(p,q) g( pq)$. Say $\tw(G) g(pq)$.
So the $pq\times pq$ grid is a minor of $G$.
Partition this grid into $q2$ copies of the $p\times p$ grid.
Each subgrid has treewidth $p$ and contracting each subgrid gives a $q\times q$ grid, which has treewidth $q$. By GMT, $\ell(p,q) O\ast( (pq)9 )$.
Are there better bounds on $\ell$?