Generalization of editing effects to AI-generated text

Determine whether the effects of professional linguistic editing observed for human-authored academic manuscripts generalize to AI-generated text and whether professional editing affects human-written and AI-generated texts in systematically different ways.

Background

The study uses paired human-authored manuscripts and their professionally edited versions to isolate the relationship between linguistic refinement and AI-detector outputs while controlling for topic, content, and authorship. This design demonstrates that editing can alter detector scores for human-written text, but it does not establish whether the same alterations occur when AI-generated text undergoes comparable human editing.

The unresolved issue is important because a detector may respond differently to editing depending on the text’s underlying origin. Matched human- and AI-generated texts subjected to controlled levels and types of human editing would be needed to determine whether professional editing interacts systematically with authorship origin.

References

Therefore, we cannot determine whether the observed effects generalize to AI-generated text or whether professional editing affects human- and AI-generated texts in systematically different ways.

— Style as a Confound: False Positives in AI Detection of Non-Native Academic Writing  (2608.26710 - Park et al., 27 Aug 2026) in Section 6, Limitations (Third limitation)