Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Exponential-time necessity for exact solutions to NP-hard optimization problems

Ascertain whether exponential time is strictly necessary in the worst case for algorithms that always produce exact optimal solutions to NP-hard optimization problems, even under the assumption that P ≠ NP.

Information Square Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Background

In discussing the computational complexity of the quantized beamforming problem, the authors situate it within the broader landscape of NP-hard optimization. They note the common belief that exact algorithms for NP-hard problems require super-polynomial time in the worst case under P ≠ NP.

They explicitly point out that, despite this understanding, it remains unproven whether exponential time is strictly necessary, highlighting a fundamental unresolved question in complexity theory relevant to the paper’s problem context.

References

NP-hard optimization problems admit no known polynomial-time solution; under the widely believed conjecture P≠NP, any algorithm that always finds an optimal solution must run in super-polynomial (and typically exponential) time in the worst case, although it remains unproven whether exponential time is strictly necessary.

Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm for MIMO with Quantized b-bit Beamforming (2510.15935 - Mitsiou et al., 7 Oct 2025) in Introduction, Motivation and Contribution subsection