Establish cross-system stability of HGR measurement
Establish the measurement stability of the Historical Grounding Ratio across narrative types and source structures by constructing larger human-annotated datasets with information units aligned across annotators and reporting the corresponding segmentation and source-classification protocols.
References
Whether grounding keeps synthesis faithful to the record, how often the figure lapses into anachronism, and how strong the visitor's sense of experiential presence is are questions a live exhibit raises but cannot answer on its own: the first two would require systematic annotation of responses against their sources, and the last a dedicated visitor study with established presence instruments.
Other systems, however, may use different source categories, granularities, and evidentiary standards. Two narratives with the same HGR may still differ substantially in the importance of their historical information, evidence quality, and narrative organization. Cross-system comparisons of HGR must therefore report both information-unit segmentation and source-classification rules. Building larger human-annotated datasets with information units aligned across annotators would help assess the measurement stability of HGR across narrative types and source structures.