Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Differentiate between competing star-formation histories for RUBIES-EGS-QG-1

Determine whether the stellar population of the quiescent galaxy RUBIES-EGS-QG-1 at redshift z=4.90 has a low metallicity of approximately 0.2 Z_sun with an early formation redshift z_form ≈ 10 and quenching by z ≳ 8.6, or instead has solar metallicity with a later formation redshift z_form ≈ 6.3 and quenching by z ≈ 5.7, given that current data do not robustly distinguish between these two star-formation histories.

Information Square Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Background

The authors model the JWST/NIRSpec PRISM spectrum and JWST/HST photometry of RUBIES-EGS-QG-1 with Prospector, finding that the galaxy is massive and quiescent, with deep Balmer absorption lines indicating rapid quenching. However, the inferred stellar ages depend sensitively on the assumed metallicity.

Their fiducial fit with metallicity as a free parameter favors a low stellar metallicity (~0.2 Z_sun), implying very early formation (z_form ≈ 10) and quenching by z ≳ 8.6. In contrast, a model with fixed solar metallicity yields a substantially younger population (z_form ≈ 6.3) and more recent quenching (z ≈ 5.7). With the current data, the authors cannot robustly discriminate between these two scenarios, although they note the stellar mass and the burst and quenching timescales are relatively insensitive to metallicity.

References

Although we cannot robustly differentiate between these two star formation histories with our current data, we stress that the stellar mass, the timescale and peak of the burst of star formation and quenching timescale do not depend significantly on metallicity.

Efficient formation of a massive quiescent galaxy at redshift 4.9 (2404.05683 - Graaff et al., 8 Apr 2024) in Main text, paragraph beginning 'However, we find that the age of the stellar population depends strongly on the assumed metallicity of the system.' (preceding the dynamical mass discussion)