Curvature Benefits at Vocabulary Scale

Determine whether hyperbolic curvature improves RiLM language-modeling performance at larger vocabulary scales and under full-vocabulary decoding, beyond the controlled 10,000-word experiments reported in the paper.

Background

RiLM removes the vocabulary-sized output matrix by deriving token probabilities from geodesic distances between the contextual state and vocabulary embeddings. Although this reduces parameter costs, decoding still requires evaluating distances to all vocabulary embeddings, creating an O(|V| * d) computational cost. The paper evaluates vocabulary sizes of 2,000 and 10,000 tokens, finding that hyperbolic RiLM is substantially better than tied SSM baselines but that Flat RiLM becomes slightly more stable and competitive with HypRiLM at 10,000 tokens.

The authors therefore leave unresolved whether negative curvature continues to provide a benefit as vocabulary size and embedding width increase, particularly for full-vocabulary settings of approximately 33,000 tokens. This question concerns empirical scaling behavior rather than the already-established performance differences in the controlled experiments.

References

Our 10k study is a first stress test: RiLM variants stay ${\sim}2\times$ better than SSM-tied but flat geometry becomes competitive with hyperbolic. We expect the decoding idea to matter most where $|V|$ is moderate and parameters scarce; whether curvature helps at scale is an open empirical question we do not resolve here.

RiLM: Parameter-Efficient Language Modeling via Geodesic Decoding  (2609.10305 - Li, 9 Sep 2026) in Section "Discussion," subsection "Efficiency and Limitations," paragraph "Scaling outlook"