Convergence theory for non-convex deep network training
Establish a rigorous theoretical framework describing the convergence behavior of gradient-based optimization methods (including stochastic gradient descent) when minimizing the non-convex empirical risk E(θ) associated with deep neural networks, specifying conditions under which convergence is guaranteed and characterizing the nature of limiting points.
References
However, in the case of deep neural networks, $E(\theta)$ is non-convex, making its theoretical analysis challenging and still largely unresolved.
Finally, characterizing convergence guarantees under realistic settings remains an open problem to study.
However, since the fairness term is non-convex, it is unclear whether the resulting algorithm converges to the underlying optimum, and it also entails complicated hyperparameter tuning for trading off accuracy and fairness.
We do not prove convergence of the stochastic optimizer or a $\tau\downarrow0$ limit for the trained scheme.
In d\ge2 dimensions, hidden-weight directions can rotate during training, changing activation boundaries and requiring a geometric characterization of active cones to extend our convergence and max-margin arguments. Training the output layer, increasing width, and adding depth introduce further interactions beyond the current analysis. Although our MNIST experiments with $16$ hidden units and a trainable output layer exhibit similar switching and loss decay, extending the theory to these settings remains open.