Clustered-index asymptotics for the KEG-D method

Establish the boundary-value and \(L_2\)-error asymptotics of the KEG-D method for clustered configurations in which the limiting ratios \(n_s/N\) have multiplicity, under the regularity condition \(f\in C^{q+\alpha-1}([-1,1];\mathbb R^2)\) with \(f^{(q+\alpha-1)}\) absolutely continuous and with \(p\) and \(r\) sufficiently smooth to support the required higher-order eigenfunction asymptotic expansions.

Background

The main asymptotic results assume that the limiting ratios cs=ns/Nc_s=n_s/N are pairwise distinct within each parity class. The remark considers the excluded case in which several ratios converge to the same limit, with maximal multiplicity α\alpha. In analogy with the trigonometric case, the authors expect the boundary-value asymptotics and the associated L2L_2-error asymptotics to remain valid after increasing the regularity assumptions and incorporating the additional reduced boundary values gq+1±,,gq+α1±g_{q+1}^{\pm},\ldots,g_{q+\alpha-1}^{\pm} into the interpolation system. This extension is explicitly left unproved.

References

One expects that eq:tilde-g-asymp and the corresponding $L_2$-error asymptotics remain valid for clustered configurations when the maximal multiplicity $\alpha$ is counted separately within each parity class, provided $f\in C{q+\alpha-1}([-1,1];\mathbb R2),$ with $f{(q+\alpha-1)}$ absolutely continuous, and $p,r$ are sufficiently smooth for the asymptotic expansions in eq:kappapm-asymp to be continued to the required order in $1/n$.

We do not prove this extension here.

eq:tilde-g-asymp:

g~k±=gk±gq+Uk±gqVk±+o(Nkq),k=0,,q1,\widetilde g_k^\pm = g_k^\pm -g_q^+U_k^\pm -g_q^-V_k^\pm +o(N^{k-q}), \qquad k=0,\dots,q-1,

eq:kappapm-asymp:

κn(+)=K0(1)n+O ⁣(1n),κn()=K0+O ⁣(1n).\kappa_n^{(+)} = K_0(-1)^n + O\!\left(\frac{1}{n}\right), \qquad \kappa_n^{(-)} = K_0 + O\!\left(\frac{1}{n}\right).

Asymptotic behavior of Eckhoff's method for convergence acceleration of Dirac eigenfunction expansions  (2609.00895 - Barkhudaryan et al., 1 Sep 2026) in Remark 3.1, Section 3.3