Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Atiyah–Floer conjecture: relate instanton and Lagrangian Floer homologies

Prove the Atiyah–Floer conjecture by establishing that, for any Heegaard splitting of a closed 3-manifold Y along a surface Σ, the instanton Floer homology of Y is isomorphic to the Lagrangian Floer homology of the pair of Lagrangian submanifolds in the moduli space of flat connections over Σ determined by the two handlebodies of the splitting.

Information Square Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Background

The remark compares Floer-type invariants in low-dimensional topology with Lagrangian Floer theory and articulates the Atiyah–Floer conjecture as a bridge between gauge-theoretic and symplectic approaches. Given a Heegaard splitting of a 3-manifold Y, one obtains two Lagrangian submanifolds in a moduli space of flat connections over the splitting surface Σ, and the conjecture predicts that the instanton Floer homology of Y matches the Lagrangian Floer homology of this pair.

The text notes there has been substantial progress toward this conjecture (e.g., by Salamon–Wehrheim and Daemi–Fukaya–Lipyanskiy), but it remains unresolved in general.

References

these are related to Lagrangian Floer theory via the Atiyah-Floer conjecture , which, given a Heegaard splitting of $Y$ as above, relates the instanton Floer homology of $Y$ to the Lagrangian Floer homology of a pair of Lagrangian submanifolds in a moduli space of flat connections over the surface $\Sigma$. See e.g.\ the work of Salamon-Wehrheim and Daemi-Fukaya-Lipyanskiy for progress towards the conjecture.

Lagrangian Floer theory, from geometry to algebra and back again (2510.22476 - Auroux, 26 Oct 2025) in Remark 1 (Remark 2.1 in the paper’s numbering), Section 1, around discussion of low-dimensional topology