Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Beyond Linear Diffusions: Improved Representations for Rare Conditional Generative Modeling

Published 2 Oct 2025 in stat.ML and cs.LG | (2510.02499v1)

Abstract: Diffusion models have emerged as powerful generative frameworks with widespread applications across machine learning and artificial intelligence systems. While current research has predominantly focused on linear diffusions, these approaches can face significant challenges when modeling a conditional distribution, $P(Y|X=x)$, when $P(X=x)$ is small. In these regions, few samples, if any, are available for training, thus modeling the corresponding conditional density may be difficult. Recognizing this, we show it is possible to adapt the data representation and forward scheme so that the sample complexity of learning a score-based generative model is small in low probability regions of the conditioning space. Drawing inspiration from conditional extreme value theory we characterize this method precisely in the special case in the tail regions of the conditioning variable, $X$. We show how diffusion with a data-driven choice of nonlinear drift term is best suited to model tail events under an appropriate representation of the data. Through empirical validation on two synthetic datasets and a real-world financial dataset, we demonstrate that our tail-adaptive approach significantly outperforms standard diffusion models in accurately capturing response distributions at the extreme tail conditions.

Summary

  • The paper proposes a novel nonlinear Langevin diffusion combined with extreme value transformations to better model rare conditional events.
  • The paper validates the approach on synthetic and financial data, demonstrating superior tail calibration and reduced sample complexity.
  • The paper’s methodology leverages data-driven normalization and modified score matching to achieve improved generative modeling in low-probability regimes.

Improved Representations for Rare Conditional Generative Modeling via Nonlinear Diffusions

Introduction

This paper addresses the limitations of standard score-based diffusion models in conditional generative modeling, particularly in the context of rare events where the conditioning variable XX takes values in the tail of its distribution and P(X=x)P(X=x) is small. Conventional linear diffusions, typically with Gaussian equilibrium, exhibit high sample complexity and poor generalization in these low-probability regions due to the scarcity of training data. The authors propose a methodology that leverages conditional extreme value theory (CEVT) and nonlinear Langevin diffusions, combined with data-driven transformations, to construct representations and forward processes that are more amenable to learning in the tails. The approach is validated on synthetic and real-world financial datasets, demonstrating improved modeling of conditional distributions under extreme conditions.

Theoretical Framework

Conditional Diffusion and Sample Complexity

Score-based diffusion models rely on learning a sequence of conditional score functions {logpμt(x)}t=0T\{\nabla \log p_{\mu_t(\cdot|x)}\}_{t=0}^T to sample from P(YX=x)P(Y|X=x). In rare regions, the lack of sufficient samples impedes accurate estimation of these scores, resulting in high KL divergence between the true and learned conditional distributions. The sample complexity is governed by the smoothness and complexity of the denoising maps, which are exacerbated in the tails under standard linear (Ornstein-Uhlenbeck) dynamics.

Conditional Extreme Value Theory (CEVT)

CEVT provides a principled framework for modeling the asymptotic behavior of P(YX=x)P(Y|X=x) as xx \to \infty. Under mild assumptions, the conditional distribution can be represented as

Y=a(X)+b(X)Z,ZG,Y = a(X) + b(X) \cdot Z, \quad Z \sim G,

where GG is independent of XX in the tail. The normalizing functions a(x)a(x) and b(x)b(x) often admit simple parametric forms, facilitating estimation even with limited tail data.

Methodology

Data Transformation

The first step is to transform the data (X,Y)(X, Y) to (X,Z)(X^\star, Z) such that for large XX^\star, P(ZX=x)GP(Z|X^\star=x) \approx G is independent of xx and typically log-concave. This involves:

  • Marginal transformation to standard Laplace for XX^\star and YY^\star.
  • Normalization using estimated a(x)a(x) and b(x)b(x) from tail samples to obtain ZZ.

This transformation regularizes the conditional distribution in the tail, making the subsequent score estimation tractable. Figure 1

Figure 1: Visualization of forward diffusion before and after transformation; post-transformation, the conditional density at tail events remains nearly stationary, simplifying score estimation.

Nonlinear Langevin Diffusion

The forward process is implemented as a Langevin diffusion targeting ege^{-g}, where gg is chosen to match the empirical tail distribution GG (e.g., Laplace, Gumbel). The drift term g\nabla g is estimated from tail data. Discretization is performed via Euler-Maruyama, with smoothing of gg to ensure efficient convergence and bounded curvature.

Score estimation targets (g+logpμt(x))(\nabla g + \nabla \log p_{\mu_t(\cdot|x)}) using a time-dependent neural network sθ(z;x,t)s_\theta(z; x, t), trained with a modified score-matching loss:

L(θ)=Et{λ(t)EX,Z0EZtZ0[sθ(z;x,t)(logpμ0t(Z0,X)(Zt)+g(Zt))22]}.\mathcal{L}(\theta) = E_t\left\{ \lambda(t) E_{X, Z_0} E_{Z_t|Z_0} \left[ \| s_\theta(z; x, t) - (\nabla \log p_{\mu_{0t}(\cdot|Z_0, X)}(Z_t) + \nabla g(Z_t)) \|_2^2 \right] \right\}.

Sampling and Inverse Transformation

Sampling proceeds via time-reversal of the learned diffusion, followed by inversion of the normalization to recover YY from ZZ:

Y=a(X)+b(X)Z,Y=F^Y1(FLap(Y)).Y^\star = a(X^\star) + b(X^\star) \cdot Z, \quad Y = \hat{F}_Y^{-1}(F_{Lap}(Y^\star)).

Empirical Evaluation

Synthetic Data

Two synthetic scenarios are considered:

  • Mean-Shifted Laplace: XPareto(1)X \sim \text{Pareto}(1), Y10X+Laplace(0,1)Y \sim \frac{10}{X} + \text{Laplace}(0, 1). The Laplace equilibrium is directly targeted without transformation.
  • Correlated Gaussian: (X,Y)(X, Y) jointly Gaussian, transformed via CEVT to (X,Z)(X^\star, Z), with GG approximated as Gumbel.

In both cases, the proposed method with appropriate base distribution (Laplace or Gumbel) captures the tail behavior of P(YX=x)P(Y|X=x) significantly better than standard Gaussian-based diffusion. Figure 2

Figure 2

Figure 2: Comparison of standard Gaussian diffusion and Laplace/Gumbel-based nonlinear diffusion on synthetic data; nonlinear diffusion accurately models heavy tails.

Figure 3

Figure 3

Figure 3: Top row: Standard method with linear diffusion fails to capture heavy Laplace tails; bottom row: new method succeeds.

Financial Data: Stock Returns Conditioned on VIX

The methodology is applied to modeling stock returns conditioned on the VIX index during periods of market stress (GFC and COVID). Training is performed on pre-crisis data, and testing on crisis periods with elevated VIX.

  • Unconditional Evaluation: QQ plots show that Laplace-based diffusion provides superior calibration in the tails compared to Gaussian, especially in the test set where extreme VIX levels are prevalent. Figure 4

Figure 4

Figure 4

Figure 4

Figure 4

Figure 4

Figure 4

Figure 4

Figure 4: QQ plot for AAPL returns under Gaussian base; underdispersion in the tails is evident.

Figure 5

Figure 5

Figure 5

Figure 5

Figure 5

Figure 5

Figure 5

Figure 5

Figure 5

Figure 5

Figure 5

Figure 5

Figure 5

Figure 5

Figure 5

Figure 5

Figure 5: QQ plot for AAPL returns under Laplace base; improved tail calibration.

  • Conditional Evaluation: Scatter plots of returns vs. VIX demonstrate that Laplace-based diffusion better captures the conditional distribution at high VIX levels, where standard Gaussian diffusion underestimates tail risk. Figure 6

Figure 6

Figure 6: Conditional performance for MSFT; Laplace base captures tail behavior as VIX increases.

Implementation Considerations

  • Score Network Architecture: Standard feedforward neural networks are used for score estimation; the complexity of the denoising maps is reduced in the transformed space, lowering sample requirements.
  • Forward Process Discretization: Smoothing of gg is critical for efficient convergence; Taylor-accelerated sampling can be used for nonlinear drift terms.
  • Inverse Transformation Robustness: The parametric forms of a(x)a(x) and b(x)b(x) ensure stable inversion even with limited tail data.
  • Computational Efficiency: The methodology is compatible with existing score-based diffusion frameworks, with additional preprocessing and drift estimation steps.

Implications and Future Directions

The proposed approach demonstrates that data-driven transformations and nonlinear diffusions, informed by CEVT, can substantially improve conditional generative modeling in rare event regimes. This has direct implications for risk modeling, anomaly detection, and any domain where accurate modeling of tail events is critical. The framework is agnostic to the specific form of the tail distribution, allowing adaptation to other domains with different extreme value behavior.

Future work should address:

  • Automated, data-driven learning of optimal transformations beyond CEVT.
  • Extension to high-dimensional conditioning variables and multivariate responses.
  • Comprehensive benchmarking against alternative generative models (e.g., GANs, VAEs) in rare event settings.
  • Theoretical analysis of sample complexity and generalization in the transformed space.

Conclusion

This paper presents a principled methodology for rare conditional generative modeling by combining data transformations based on extreme value theory with nonlinear score-based diffusion models. Empirical results on synthetic and financial datasets confirm that the approach yields superior modeling of conditional distributions in the tails, with reduced sample complexity and improved calibration. The framework is broadly applicable and opens avenues for further research in robust generative modeling under data scarcity and distributional shift.

Paper to Video (Beta)

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 2 tweets with 75 likes about this paper.