Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
2000 character limit reached

LLM-Assisted Crisis Management: Building Advanced LLM Platforms for Effective Emergency Response and Public Collaboration (2402.10908v1)

Published 12 Jan 2024 in cs.CL, cs.AI, cs.HC, and cs.LG

Abstract: Emergencies and critical incidents often unfold rapidly, necessitating a swift and effective response. In this research, we introduce a novel approach to identify and classify emergency situations from social media posts and direct emergency messages using an open source LLM, LLAMA2. The goal is to harness the power of natural language processing and machine learning to assist public safety telecommunicators and huge crowds during countrywide emergencies. Our research focuses on developing a LLM that can understand users describe their situation in the 911 call, enabling LLAMA2 to analyze the content and offer relevant instructions to the telecommunicator, while also creating workflows to notify government agencies with the caller's information when necessary. Another benefit this LLM provides is its ability to assist people during a significant emergency incident when the 911 system is overwhelmed, by assisting the users with simple instructions and informing authorities with their location and emergency information.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (37)
  1. A. Team, “Climate change and infrastructure, urban systems, and vulnerabilities: Technical report for the u.s. department of energy in support of the national climate assessment,” National Climate Assessment, 2014.
  2. New York City Government, “Hurricane sandy,” https://www.nyc.gov/site/cdbgdr/hurricane-sandy/hurricane-sandy.page, 2023.
  3. N. Pourebrahim, S. Sultana, J. Edwards, A. Gochanour, and S. Mohanty, “Understanding communication dynamics on twitter during natural disasters: A case study of hurricane sandy,” International journal of disaster risk reduction, vol. 37, p. 101176, 2019.
  4. Z. Wang, N. S. Lam, N. Obradovich, and X. Ye, “Are vulnerable communities digitally left behind in social responses to natural disasters? an evidence from hurricane sandy with twitter data,” Applied geography, vol. 108, pp. 1–8, 2019.
  5. A. L. Hughes, L. A. St. Denis, L. Palen, and K. M. Anderson, “Online public communications by police & fire services during the 2012 hurricane sandy,” in Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, 2014, pp. 1505–1514.
  6. S. Loreti, E. Ser-Giacomi, A. Zischg, M. Keiler, and M. Barthelemy, “Local impacts on road networks and access to critical locations during extreme floods,” Scientific reports, vol. 12, no. 1, p. 1552, 2022.
  7. R. Grace, “Overcoming barriers to social media use through multisensor integration in emergency management systems,” International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, vol. 66, p. 102636, 2021.
  8. S. Misra, P. Roberts, and M. Rhodes, “Information overload, stress, and emergency managerial thinking,” International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, vol. 51, p. 101762, 2020.
  9. N. Andreassen, O. J. Borch, and A. K. Sydnes, “Information sharing and emergency response coordination,” Safety Science, vol. 130, p. 104895, 2020.
  10. Z. El Khaled and H. Mcheick, “Case studies of communications systems during harsh environments: A review of approaches, weaknesses, and limitations to improve quality of service,” International journal of distributed sensor networks, vol. 15, no. 2, 2019.
  11. S. E. Clayman and H. Kevoe-Feldman, “Dispatching first responders: Language practices and the dispatcher’s operational role in radio encounters with police officers,” Discourse & Society, 2023.
  12. A. Dimou, D. G. Kogias, P. Trakadas, F. Perossini, M. Weller, O. Balet, C. Z. Patrikakis, T. Zahariadis, and P. Daras, “Faster: First responder advanced technologies for safe and efficient emergency response,” in Technology Development for Security Practitioners.   Springer, 2021, pp. 447–460.
  13. T. Mondal, S. Pramanik, P. Pramanik, K. N. Datta, P. S. Paul, S. Saha, and S. Nandi, “Emergency communication and use of ict in disaster management,” Emerging technologies for disaster resilience: Practical cases and theories, pp. 161–197, 2021.
  14. H. Adam, A. Balagopalan, E. Alsentzer, F. Christia, and M. Ghassemi, “Mitigating the impact of biased artificial intelligence in emergency decision-making,” Communications Medicine, vol. 2, no. 1, p. 149, 2022.
  15. H. Lakkaraju and O. Bastani, “”how do i fool you?”: Manipulating user trust via misleading black box explanations,” in Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society.   Association for Computing Machinery, 2020, p. 79–85.
  16. F. Poursabzi-Sangdeh, D. G. Goldstein, J. M. Hofman, J. W. Wortman Vaughan, and H. Wallach, “Manipulating and measuring model interpretability,” in Proceedings of the 2021 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems, 2021, pp. 1–52.
  17. P. R. Buchanan and C. Sparagowski, “The role of emerging technologies and social justice in emergency management practice: The good, the bad, and the future,” Justice, Equity, and Emergency Management, pp. 175–199, 2022.
  18. S. Pilemalm, “Barriers to digitalized co-production: the case of volunteer first responders,” in 19th International Conference on Information Systems for Crisis Response and Management, Tarbes, France, May 22-25, 2022, 2022.
  19. F. C. Commission, “Emergency communications,” https://www.fcc.gov/general/emergency-communications, 2023.
  20. Federal Communications Commission, “Wireless emergency alerts (wea),” https://www.fcc.gov/emergency-alert-system, 2023.
  21. J. Sutton, Y. Rivera, T. K. Sell, M. B. Moran, D. Bennett Gayle, M. Schoch-Spana, E. K. Stern, and D. Turetsky, “Longitudinal risk communication: A research agenda for communicating in a pandemic,” Health Security, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 370–378, 2021.
  22. E. Stern and B. Nussbaum, “Critical infrastructure disruption and crisis management,” in Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics, 2022.
  23. K. Harrison, “Improving information sharing in the nyc emergency response community,” Homeland Security Affairs, 2018.
  24. N. L. Rane, A. Tawde, S. P. Choudhary, and J. Rane, “Contribution and performance of chatgpt and other large language models (llm) for scientific and research advancements: a double-edged sword,” International Research Journal of Modernization in Engineering Technology and Science, vol. 5, no. 10, pp. 875–899, 2023.
  25. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, “Working together to achieve improved emergency response around the world,” 2023.
  26. Department of Homeland Security, “Dhs prepares and equips communities to address increased risk of fires,” 2023.
  27. Online Masters in Public Health, “Innovative emergency management and response,” USC Online MPH Program, November 2023.
  28. W. Chen, G. Rao, D. Kang, Z. Wan, and D. Wang, “Early report of the source characteristics, ground motions, and casualty estimates of the 2023 m w 7.8 and 7.5 turkey earthquakes,” Journal of Earth Science, 2023.
  29. H. Touvron, L. Martin, K. Stone, P. Albert, A. Almahairi, Y. Babaei, N. Bashlykov, S. Batra, P. Bhargava, S. Bhosale et al., “Llama 2: Open foundation and fine-tuned chat models,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.09288, 2023.
  30. Mistral AI, “Mixtral 8x7b,” https://mistral.ai/.
  31. U.S. Census Bureau, “Language use in the united states: 2019,” American Community Survey, 2019.
  32. J. P. Welch, “The challenges of public service organizations in emergency, crisis, and disaster management,” in Crisis Management, 2022.
  33. N. Jain, P. yeh Chiang, Y. Wen, J. Kirchenbauer, H.-M. Chu, G. Somepalli, B. R. Bartoldson, B. Kailkhura, A. Schwarzschild, A. Saha, M. Goldblum, J. Geiping, and T. Goldstein, “Neftune: Noisy embeddings improve instruction finetuning,” 2023.
  34. T. Dao, “Flashattention-2: Faster attention with better parallelism and work partitioning,” 2023.
  35. A. E. Cinà, K. Grosse, A. Demontis, S. Vascon, W. Zellinger, B. A. Moser, A. Oprea, B. Biggio, M. Pelillo, and F. Roli, “Wild patterns reloaded: A survey of machine learning security against training data poisoning,” ACM Computing Surveys, 2023.
  36. M. Aljanabi, “Safeguarding connected health: Leveraging trustworthy ai techniques to harden intrusion detection systems against data poisoning threats in iomt environments,” Babylonian Journal of Internet of Things, 2023.
  37. J. Mökander, J. Schuett, H. R. Kirk, and L. Floridi, “Auditing large language models: a three-layered approach,” AI and Ethics, pp. 1–31, 2023.
Citations (7)

Summary

  • The paper integrates LLMs into 911 dispatch to improve emergency call accuracy and multilingual processing efficiency.
  • It introduces an LLM-enhanced mobile app that provides real-time guidance and categorizes emergencies using advanced analytics.
  • The study highlights trade-offs between model size and performance, while addressing ethical considerations in deploying LLMs for crisis management.

LLM-Assisted Crisis Management: Building Advanced LLM Platforms for Effective Emergency Response and Public Collaboration

Introduction

The paper "LLM-Assisted Crisis Management: Building Advanced LLM Platforms for Effective Emergency Response and Public Collaboration" addresses the challenges in emergency response systems, particularly in urban settings characterized by linguistic diversity and a high incidence of crises. Traditional systems often suffer from information overload and communication bottlenecks. This paper explores the integration of LLMs, specifically LLAMA2 and Mistral, to enhance 911 dispatch efficiency and public collaboration during emergencies.

Enhancing 911 Dispatch Efficiency

The central innovation of this framework is the integration of LLMs into the 911 dispatch process. An LLM works alongside human dispatchers to process emergency calls, enhancing the accuracy and efficiency of information transmission. This system includes real-time transcription, text segmentation, and named entity recognition (NER) to handle multilingual inputs effectively. The accuracy of incident classification is improved, facilitating better resource allocation and response coordination. This LLM integration also aids in overcoming language barriers, assisting dispatchers in diverse urban environments like New York City.

Public Collaboration and Crisis Management

The second framework focuses on public collaboration. It involves an LLM-enhanced mobile app that provides real-time, AI-driven instructions to the public during major emergencies. Managed by emergency response centers, this app guides users on safe shelter locations and supplies, using real-time analytics to inform individuals effectively. The system categorizes emergency types and communicates this information to relevant authorities, enhancing the overall responsiveness and efficiency of emergency management systems.

Methodology

The methodology centers on fine-tuning LLAMA2 and Mistral models using selected datasets. The Turkey Earthquake X Corpus and Emergency-Disaster Messages Dataset were utilized for this purpose. These datasets include a significant amount of emergency-related communications necessary for training. The LLAMA2 and Mistral models were evaluated on their ability to process this information with accuracy and efficiency across multiple languages through techniques such as supervised fine-tuning, quantization with QLoRA, and techniques like NEFTune for improved performance.

Experimental Results

The paper identifies LLAMA2-70B as the most effective model for classifying emergency messages, achieving high precision and recall rates. It demonstrates superior performance in handling complex, multilingual queries. However, it requires significant computational resources. In contrast, smaller models like LLAMA2-13B offer a balance of speed and accuracy, making them ideal for real-time applications. These findings highlight the trade-offs between model size and performance, emphasizing the importance of selecting appropriate models based on specific application requirements.

Challenges and Considerations

Integrating AI into emergency response systems presents challenges such as potential biases, cybersecurity threats, and the need for human oversight. Data and model poisoning are significant concerns, necessitating stringent validation protocols and adversarial training to maintain system integrity. Moreover, the development of such systems must prioritize ethical considerations, including transparency, privacy, and accountability, to gain public trust and acceptance.

Conclusion

The research underscores the transformative potential of LLMs in crisis management, presenting scalable frameworks for enhanced 911 dispatch and public collaboration. While LLAMA2 shows promise in handling complex real-time language processing, future research should address ethical concerns and ensure responsible AI deployment. The evolution of generative AI and its integration into emergency systems call for ongoing evaluation and refinement to optimize their role in safeguarding public welfare during crises.

Slide Deck Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Whiteboard

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 2 tweets with 0 likes about this paper.