Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
119 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
56 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
6 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Evaluating the Performance of StyleGAN2-ADA on Medical Images (2210.03786v1)

Published 7 Oct 2022 in eess.IV, cs.CV, and cs.LG

Abstract: Although generative adversarial networks (GANs) have shown promise in medical imaging, they have four main limitations that impeded their utility: computational cost, data requirements, reliable evaluation measures, and training complexity. Our work investigates each of these obstacles in a novel application of StyleGAN2-ADA to high-resolution medical imaging datasets. Our dataset is comprised of liver-containing axial slices from non-contrast and contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) scans. Additionally, we utilized four public datasets composed of various imaging modalities. We trained a StyleGAN2 network with transfer learning (from the Flickr-Faces-HQ dataset) and data augmentation (horizontal flipping and adaptive discriminator augmentation). The network's generative quality was measured quantitatively with the Fr\'echet Inception Distance (FID) and qualitatively with a visual Turing test given to seven radiologists and radiation oncologists. The StyleGAN2-ADA network achieved a FID of 5.22 ($\pm$ 0.17) on our liver CT dataset. It also set new record FIDs of 10.78, 3.52, 21.17, and 5.39 on the publicly available SLIVER07, ChestX-ray14, ACDC, and Medical Segmentation Decathlon (brain tumors) datasets. In the visual Turing test, the clinicians rated generated images as real 42% of the time, approaching random guessing. Our computational ablation study revealed that transfer learning and data augmentation stabilize training and improve the perceptual quality of the generated images. We observed the FID to be consistent with human perceptual evaluation of medical images. Finally, our work found that StyleGAN2-ADA consistently produces high-quality results without hyperparameter searches or retraining.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (15)
  1. McKell Woodland (5 papers)
  2. John Wood (9 papers)
  3. Brian M. Anderson (1 paper)
  4. Suprateek Kundu (24 papers)
  5. Ethan Lin (3 papers)
  6. Eugene Koay (1 paper)
  7. Bruno Odisio (1 paper)
  8. Caroline Chung (9 papers)
  9. Hyunseon Christine Kang (2 papers)
  10. Aradhana M. Venkatesan (2 papers)
  11. Sireesha Yedururi (1 paper)
  12. Brian De (1 paper)
  13. Yuan-Mao Lin (1 paper)
  14. Ankit B. Patel (19 papers)
  15. Kristy K. Brock (5 papers)
Citations (22)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.