Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
102 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
59 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
6 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
50 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Additional Look into GAN-based Augmentation for Deep Learning COVID-19 Image Classification (2401.14705v2)

Published 26 Jan 2024 in eess.IV and cs.CV

Abstract: The availability of training data is one of the main limitations in deep learning applications for medical imaging. Data augmentation is a popular approach to overcome this problem. A new approach is a Machine Learning based augmentation, in particular usage of Generative Adversarial Networks (GAN). In this case, GANs generate images similar to the original dataset so that the overall training data amount is bigger, which leads to better performance of trained networks. A GAN model consists of two networks, a generator and a discriminator interconnected in a feedback loop which creates a competitive environment. This work is a continuation of the previous research where we trained StyleGAN2-ADA by Nvidia on the limited COVID-19 chest X-ray image dataset. In this paper, we study the dependence of the GAN-based augmentation performance on dataset size with a focus on small samples. Two datasets are considered, one with 1000 images per class (4000 images in total) and the second with 500 images per class (2000 images in total). We train StyleGAN2-ADA with both sets and then, after validating the quality of generated images, we use trained GANs as one of the augmentations approaches in multi-class classification problems. We compare the quality of the GAN-based augmentation approach to two different approaches (classical augmentation and no augmentation at all) by employing transfer learning-based classification of COVID-19 chest X-ray images. The results are quantified using different classification quality metrics and compared to the results from the literature. The GAN-based augmentation approach is found to be comparable with classical augmentation in the case of medium and large datasets but underperforms in the case of smaller datasets. The correlation between the size of the original dataset and the quality of classification is visible independently from the augmentation approach.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (16)
  1. Inceptionv3 - keras applications api referecne. URL https://keras.io/api/applications/inceptionv3/.
  2. Rmsprop - keras optimizers api referecne. URL https://keras.io/api/optimizers/rmsprop/.
  3. Demystifying mmd gans, 2021, 1801.01401.
  4. M. J. Chong and D. Forsyth. Effectively unbiased fid and inception score and where to find them, 2020, 1911.07023.
  5. Fast and accurate deep network learning by exponential linear units (elus), 2016, 1511.07289.
  6. Performance of gan-based augmentation for deep learning covid-19 image classification, 2023, 2304.09067.
  7. Generative adversarial networks, 2014, 1406.2661.
  8. Gans trained by a two time-scale update rule converge to a local nash equilibrium, 2018, 1706.08500.
  9. Training generative adversarial networks with limited data, 2020, 2006.06676.
  10. Analyzing and improving the image quality of stylegan. CoRR, abs/1912.04958, 2019, 1912.04958. URL http://arxiv.org/abs/1912.04958.
  11. A systematic collection of medical image datasets for deep learning, 2021, 2106.12864.
  12. Exploring the effect of image enhancement techniques on covid-19 detection using chest x-ray images. Computers in Biology and Medicine, 132:104319, 2021. doi:doi:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2021.104319.
  13. Rethinking the inception architecture for computer vision, 2015, 1512.00567.
  14. Privacy preserving generative adversarial networks to model electronic health records. Neural Networks, 153:339–348, 2022. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neunet.2022.06.022.
  15. Data collection and quality challenges in deep learning: A data-centric ai perspective, 2022, 2112.06409.
  16. Image data augmentation for deep learning: A survey, 2022, 2204.08610.
User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (4)
  1. Oleksandr Fedoruk (2 papers)
  2. Konrad Klimaszewski (11 papers)
  3. Aleksander Ogonowski (3 papers)
  4. Michał Kruk (1 paper)
Citations (4)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.