Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Assistant
AI Research Assistant
Well-researched responses based on relevant abstracts and paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 98 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 58 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 25 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 23 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 112 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 165 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 460 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 29 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

A concentration inequality and a local law for the sum of two random matrices (1010.0353v3)

Published 2 Oct 2010 in math.PR

Abstract: Let H=A+UBU* where A and B are two N-by-N Hermitian matrices and U is a Haar-distributed random unitary matrix, and let \mu_H, \mu_A, and \mu_B be empirical measures of eigenvalues of matrices H, A, and B, respectively. Then, it is known (see, for example, Pastur-Vasilchuk, CMP, 2000, v.214, pp.249-286) that for large N, measure \mu_H is close to the free convolution of measures \mu_A and \mu_B, where the free convolution is a non-linear operation on probability measures. The large deviations of the cumulative distribution function of \mu_H from its expectation have been studied by Chatterjee in in JFA, 2007, v. 245, pp.379-389. In this paper we improve Chatterjee's concentration inequality and show that it holds with the rate which is quadratic in N. In addition, we prove a local law for eigenvalues of H, by showing that the normalized number of eigenvalues in an interval converges to the density of the free convolution of \mu_A and \mu_B provided that the interval has width (log N){-1/2}.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Lightbulb Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Authors (1)

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.