Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Vectorial Drinfeld Modular Forms Theory

Updated 12 July 2026
  • Vectorial Drinfeld modular forms are non-Archimedean, Banach algebra-valued functions on Drinfeld period domains that transform under finite-dimensional representations of modular groups.
  • They generalize scalar-valued Drinfeld modular forms while preserving characteristic‑p analytic features such as u‑expansions, Hecke correspondences, and rigid-analytic uniformizers.
  • The theory employs explicit constructions like Eisenstein series, determinant forms, and τ‑recurrent sequences to connect analytic methods with deep arithmetic structures.

Vectorial Drinfeld modular forms are rigid-analytic functions on Drinfeld period domains that take values in finite-dimensional modules over positive-characteristic Banach algebras—most notably Tate algebras and their completions—and transform under finite-dimensional representations of Drinfeld modular groups. They extend scalar-valued Drinfeld modular forms for groups such as Γ=GL2(Fq[θ])\Gamma=\mathrm{GL}_2(\mathbb{F}_q[\theta]) and, in higher rank, GLr(A)\mathrm{GL}_r(A), while preserving the characteristic-pp analytic features of the theory: Carlitz and Drinfeld exponentials, uu-expansions at cusps, Hecke correspondences, and rigid-analytic or algebro-geometric boundary conditions (Pellarin, 2019). In the literature, the subject develops along two closely related lines: the rank-two theory over Tate algebras initiated by Pellarin and further developed with Perkins [(Pellarin, 2011); (Pellarin et al., 2016)], and the broader analytic and higher-rank programs that incorporate Banach algebra coefficients, arbitrary-rank period domains, determinant constructions, and Hecke eigenforms [(Pellarin, 2019); (Perkins, 2014); (Gezmiş et al., 25 Sep 2025)].

1. Analytic origin and scalar background

The scalar theory underlying vectorial Drinfeld modular forms begins with the Carlitz module and its exponential

expC(z)=i0di1zqi,\exp_C(z) = \sum_{i\geq 0} d_i^{-1} z^{q^i},

an entire, surjective, non-Archimedean analytic function attached to the Carlitz lattice Λ=Fq[θ]π~\Lambda=\mathbb{F}_q[\theta]\tilde{\pi} in C\mathbb{C}_\infty. Its Weierstrass product expansion and functional equation provide the analytic model for later modular constructions, including the standard uniformizer

u(z)=1π~expC(π~z)u(z)=\frac{1}{\tilde{\pi}\exp_C(\tilde{\pi} z)}

at the cusp infinity in rank two (Pellarin, 2019).

Drinfeld AA-modules generalize the Carlitz module through injective algebra morphisms

ϕ:AEndFq(Ga(C))C[τ],\phi : A \to \operatorname{End}_{\mathbb{F}_q}(G_a(\mathbb{C}_\infty)) \simeq \mathbb{C}_\infty[\tau],

with associated exponentials

GLr(A)\mathrm{GL}_r(A)0

for lattices GLr(A)\mathrm{GL}_r(A)1. This correspondence between lattices and Drinfeld modules is the analytic basis for scalar modular forms, Anderson GLr(A)\mathrm{GL}_r(A)2-modules, and the vectorial generalizations built from them (Pellarin, 2019).

For GLr(A)\mathrm{GL}_r(A)3 with GLr(A)\mathrm{GL}_r(A)4, the relevant rigid-analytic space is the Drinfeld upper half-plane

GLr(A)\mathrm{GL}_r(A)5

on which GLr(A)\mathrm{GL}_r(A)6 acts by homographies. A scalar Drinfeld modular form of weight GLr(A)\mathrm{GL}_r(A)7 is an analytic function GLr(A)\mathrm{GL}_r(A)8 satisfying

GLr(A)\mathrm{GL}_r(A)9

together with a cusp condition described by the pp0-expansion (Pellarin, 2019). In arbitrary rank, the period domain becomes

pp1

and the slash action is expressed through the factor pp2 extracted from the last coordinate of pp3 (Basson et al., 2018).

This scalar background is essential because the vectorial theory does not replace it; rather, it reinterprets modularity in representation-theoretic form and imports the same cusp-expansion machinery into Banach algebra-valued settings. A common misconception is that vectorial forms are merely tuples of scalar forms. The published constructions show that this is too restrictive: the theory admits genuinely vector-valued modular forms attached to nontrivial representations and to coefficient algebras where phenomena absent from the scalar theory occur (Pellarin, 2019).

2. Definitions, representations, and coefficient algebras

In the rank-two Tate algebra setting of Pellarin and Perkins, a vectorial modular form of weight pp4, type pp5, and representation pp6 is a rigid-analytic map

pp7

such that for every pp8,

pp9

supplemented by a regularity condition at infinity formulated in terms of uu0 after a suitable twist (Pellarin et al., 2016). Here uu1 is the Tate algebra, and uu2 is induced by evaluation of matrix entries at the variable uu3.

More generally, for a Banach uu4-algebra uu5 and a representation

uu6

a vector-valued Drinfeld modular form of weight uu7 is an analytic function

uu8

satisfying

uu9

The coefficient algebras in this framework include finite-dimensional complete ultrametric extensions and modules over Tate algebras, and the analytic structure is organized by the completed tensor product sheaf expC(z)=i0di1zqi,\exp_C(z) = \sum_{i\geq 0} d_i^{-1} z^{q^i},0 (Pellarin, 2019).

Pellarin’s analytic theory broadens the coefficient field further. For a finite subset expC(z)=i0di1zqi,\exp_C(z) = \sum_{i\geq 0} d_i^{-1} z^{q^i},1 and a representation

expC(z)=i0di1zqi,\exp_C(z) = \sum_{i\geq 0} d_i^{-1} z^{q^i},2

a vector-valued Drinfeld modular form of weight expC(z)=i0di1zqi,\exp_C(z) = \sum_{i\geq 0} d_i^{-1} z^{q^i},3 is a rigid-analytic function

expC(z)=i0di1zqi,\exp_C(z) = \sum_{i\geq 0} d_i^{-1} z^{q^i},4

satisfying

expC(z)=i0di1zqi,\exp_C(z) = \sum_{i\geq 0} d_i^{-1} z^{q^i},5

with the same type of cusp regularity (Pellarin, 2019).

A central class in that theory is formed by the “representations of the first kind.” These are finite-dimensional representations built, by direct sums, tensor products, symmetric powers, exterior powers, and contragredients, from basic evaluation-type representations. They include the arithmetic cases emphasized in later applications (Pellarin, 2019). For special subsets expC(z)=i0di1zqi,\exp_C(z) = \sum_{i\geq 0} d_i^{-1} z^{q^i},6, the Kronecker product representations expC(z)=i0di1zqi,\exp_C(z) = \sum_{i\geq 0} d_i^{-1} z^{q^i},7 play a distinguished role in explicit formulas and harmonic products (Pellarin, 2019).

In arbitrary rank, the 2025 work develops vectorial Drinfeld modular forms for a specific representation

expC(z)=i0di1zqi,\exp_C(z) = \sum_{i\geq 0} d_i^{-1} z^{q^i},8

where expC(z)=i0di1zqi,\exp_C(z) = \sum_{i\geq 0} d_i^{-1} z^{q^i},9 denotes reduction modulo Λ=Fq[θ]π~\Lambda=\mathbb{F}_q[\theta]\tilde{\pi}0 to Λ=Fq[θ]π~\Lambda=\mathbb{F}_q[\theta]\tilde{\pi}1. A vectorial Drinfeld modular form

Λ=Fq[θ]π~\Lambda=\mathbb{F}_q[\theta]\tilde{\pi}2

then satisfies

Λ=Fq[θ]π~\Lambda=\mathbb{F}_q[\theta]\tilde{\pi}3

together with a holomorphy-at-infinity condition formulated through Λ=Fq[θ]π~\Lambda=\mathbb{F}_q[\theta]\tilde{\pi}4-expansions and a matrix Λ=Fq[θ]π~\Lambda=\mathbb{F}_q[\theta]\tilde{\pi}5 (Gezmiş et al., 25 Sep 2025).

3. Expansions at infinity, uniformizers, and boundary behavior

The Λ=Fq[θ]π~\Lambda=\mathbb{F}_q[\theta]\tilde{\pi}6-expansion is the characteristic analogue of the classical Λ=Fq[θ]π~\Lambda=\mathbb{F}_q[\theta]\tilde{\pi}7-expansion. In arbitrary rank scalar theory, one decomposes

Λ=Fq[θ]π~\Lambda=\mathbb{F}_q[\theta]\tilde{\pi}8

and defines the expansion parameter

Λ=Fq[θ]π~\Lambda=\mathbb{F}_q[\theta]\tilde{\pi}9

where C\mathbb{C}_\infty0 is the Drinfeld exponential attached to the strongly discrete group C\mathbb{C}_\infty1. Any C\mathbb{C}_\infty2-invariant holomorphic function on C\mathbb{C}_\infty3 admits a unique Laurent-type expansion

C\mathbb{C}_\infty4

convergent on a neighborhood of infinity, and the coefficients C\mathbb{C}_\infty5 are holomorphic on C\mathbb{C}_\infty6 (Basson et al., 2018).

The decisive recursive feature is that these coefficients are themselves weak modular forms of lower rank: C\mathbb{C}_\infty7 Holomorphicity at infinity is then defined by the condition that no negative powers occur, i.e.

C\mathbb{C}_\infty8

The same recursion is one of the main reasons the scalar higher-rank theory is structurally relevant for vectorial extensions (Basson et al., 2018).

In the rank-two vectorial theory over Banach algebras, Pellarin introduces a “field of uniformisers” C\mathbb{C}_\infty9, a valued field containing u(z)=1π~expC(π~z)u(z)=\frac{1}{\tilde{\pi}\exp_C(\tilde{\pi} z)}0, described as non-discretely valued, algebraically closed, and wildly ramified over u(z)=1π~expC(π~z)u(z)=\frac{1}{\tilde{\pi}\exp_C(\tilde{\pi} z)}1. Entrywise expansions of vectorial modular forms are uniquely represented as generalized formal series in this field (Pellarin, 2019). This is not merely a technical reformulation of the scalar u(z)=1π~expC(π~z)u(z)=\frac{1}{\tilde{\pi}\exp_C(\tilde{\pi} z)}2-expansion: it is designed to control expansions whose coefficients lie in more complicated Banach-algebraic targets than u(z)=1π~expC(π~z)u(z)=\frac{1}{\tilde{\pi}\exp_C(\tilde{\pi} z)}3.

Boundary expansions in higher-rank scalar theory further refine the analytic picture. For moduli varieties of rank u(z)=1π~expC(π~z)u(z)=\frac{1}{\tilde{\pi}\exp_C(\tilde{\pi} z)}4, expansions along boundary divisors use local parameters u(z)=1π~expC(π~z)u(z)=\frac{1}{\tilde{\pi}\exp_C(\tilde{\pi} z)}5 and u(z)=1π~expC(π~z)u(z)=\frac{1}{\tilde{\pi}\exp_C(\tilde{\pi} z)}6, and the coefficients again reduce to lower-rank modular data. Product formulas for discriminant forms u(z)=1π~expC(π~z)u(z)=\frac{1}{\tilde{\pi}\exp_C(\tilde{\pi} z)}7 and explicit vanishing orders are expressed in terms of partial zeta values at u(z)=1π~expC(π~z)u(z)=\frac{1}{\tilde{\pi}\exp_C(\tilde{\pi} z)}8 (Gekeler, 2023). This suggests that any higher-rank vectorial theory compatible with compactification should inherit a recursive boundary calculus, although the cited paper notes that vectorial forms are not its central focus (Gekeler, 2023).

An adjacent algebro-geometric formulation comes from Satake compactification. For a fine open compact subgroup u(z)=1π~expC(π~z)u(z)=\frac{1}{\tilde{\pi}\exp_C(\tilde{\pi} z)}9, scalar Drinfeld modular forms of weight AA0 are global sections

AA1

where AA2 is the dual of the relative Lie algebra of the extended universal family over the Satake compactification AA3 (Pink, 2010). The paper explicitly notes that this sheaf-theoretic, boundary-aware formalism is the natural framework for future vector-valued generalizations via higher-rank automorphic bundles (Pink, 2010).

4. Explicit constructions: Eisenstein series, deformations, and determinant forms

Vectorial Eisenstein series are the primary explicit examples. In the rank-two Tate algebra theory they are defined by

AA4

and they satisfy the vectorial modular transformation law. Pellarin and Perkins show that AA5 and AA6 generate the corresponding modules of vectorial modular forms over scalar forms (Pellarin et al., 2016).

A broader Eisenstein framework appears in the Banach algebra-valued theory. For a morphism AA7, vectorial Eisenstein series of the form

AA8

are constructed, with convergence and analytic properties controlled by the ultrametric setting (Pellarin, 2019). Their relation to matrix-valued and Perkins-type series is encoded by expansions of functions such as

AA9

whose coefficients recover Eisenstein series (Pellarin, 2019).

Pellarin’s earlier work on ϕ:AEndFq(Ga(C))C[τ],\phi : A \to \operatorname{End}_{\mathbb{F}_q}(G_a(\mathbb{C}_\infty)) \simeq \mathbb{C}_\infty[\tau],0-recurrent sequences supplies a deformation-theoretic precursor to the modern vectorial theory. The family ϕ:AEndFq(Ga(C))C[τ],\phi : A \to \operatorname{End}_{\mathbb{F}_q}(G_a(\mathbb{C}_\infty)) \simeq \mathbb{C}_\infty[\tau],1 is defined by the ϕ:AEndFq(Ga(C))C[τ],\phi : A \to \operatorname{End}_{\mathbb{F}_q}(G_a(\mathbb{C}_\infty)) \simeq \mathbb{C}_\infty[\tau],2-linear recurrence

ϕ:AEndFq(Ga(C))C[τ],\phi : A \to \operatorname{End}_{\mathbb{F}_q}(G_a(\mathbb{C}_\infty)) \simeq \mathbb{C}_\infty[\tau],3

with ϕ:AEndFq(Ga(C))C[τ],\phi : A \to \operatorname{End}_{\mathbb{F}_q}(G_a(\mathbb{C}_\infty)) \simeq \mathbb{C}_\infty[\tau],4 and ϕ:AEndFq(Ga(C))C[τ],\phi : A \to \operatorname{End}_{\mathbb{F}_q}(G_a(\mathbb{C}_\infty)) \simeq \mathbb{C}_\infty[\tau],5, and interpolates between normalized Eisenstein series and para-Eisenstein series through the specializations

ϕ:AEndFq(Ga(C))C[τ],\phi : A \to \operatorname{End}_{\mathbb{F}_q}(G_a(\mathbb{C}_\infty)) \simeq \mathbb{C}_\infty[\tau],6

This deformation is expressed in terms of vectorial modular ingredients such as ϕ:AEndFq(Ga(C))C[τ],\phi : A \to \operatorname{End}_{\mathbb{F}_q}(G_a(\mathbb{C}_\infty)) \simeq \mathbb{C}_\infty[\tau],7 and ϕ:AEndFq(Ga(C))C[τ],\phi : A \to \operatorname{End}_{\mathbb{F}_q}(G_a(\mathbb{C}_\infty)) \simeq \mathbb{C}_\infty[\tau],8 and an Eisenstein-type expansion involving ϕ:AEndFq(Ga(C))C[τ],\phi : A \to \operatorname{End}_{\mathbb{F}_q}(G_a(\mathbb{C}_\infty)) \simeq \mathbb{C}_\infty[\tau],9 (Pellarin, 2011).

In arbitrary rank, determinant constructions organize vectorial Eisenstein series into scalar cusp forms. For

GLr(A)\mathrm{GL}_r(A)00

the matrix

GLr(A)\mathrm{GL}_r(A)01

has determinant GLr(A)\mathrm{GL}_r(A)02, which is a nowhere-vanishing, single-cuspidal deformation of Drinfeld modular forms in

GLr(A)\mathrm{GL}_r(A)03

(Perkins, 2014). The same paper constructs a nowhere-vanishing, single-cuspidal Drinfeld modular form for GLr(A)\mathrm{GL}_r(A)04 of weight GLr(A)\mathrm{GL}_r(A)05 and type GLr(A)\mathrm{GL}_r(A)06 through determinants of Anderson generating functions and rigid analytic trivializations (Perkins, 2014).

The 2025 arbitrary-rank vectorial theory refines this determinant method using twisted Eisenstein series

GLr(A)\mathrm{GL}_r(A)07

and defines

GLr(A)\mathrm{GL}_r(A)08

For GLr(A)\mathrm{GL}_r(A)09, the specialization GLr(A)\mathrm{GL}_r(A)10 is a Drinfeld cusp form of weight GLr(A)\mathrm{GL}_r(A)11 and type GLr(A)\mathrm{GL}_r(A)12, and it is a Hecke eigenform for all Hecke operators (Gezmiş et al., 25 Sep 2025).

5. Module structure, specialization, and operators

A central structural theorem in the rank-two Tate algebra setting states that for every positive integer GLr(A)\mathrm{GL}_r(A)13 and GLr(A)\mathrm{GL}_r(A)14,

GLr(A)\mathrm{GL}_r(A)15

Thus the module of vectorial modular forms is free of rank two over the module of scalar Drinfeld modular forms, generated by explicit vectorial Eisenstein series (Pellarin et al., 2016).

The arbitrary-rank 2025 paper proves an analogous decomposition for the modules GLr(A)\mathrm{GL}_r(A)16 of vectorial Drinfeld modular forms: GLr(A)\mathrm{GL}_r(A)17 where the GLr(A)\mathrm{GL}_r(A)18 are explicit vectorial modular forms constructed from Anderson generating functions (Gezmiş et al., 25 Sep 2025). In the more general Banach-algebra setting, the corresponding module statement is phrased as

GLr(A)\mathrm{GL}_r(A)19

with GLr(A)\mathrm{GL}_r(A)20 the scalar modular ring and GLr(A)\mathrm{GL}_r(A)21 the target vector space, under the hypotheses of the theory (Pellarin, 2019).

Specialization at roots of unity is one of the most distinctive arithmetic features of vectorial Drinfeld modular forms over Tate algebras. If GLr(A)\mathrm{GL}_r(A)22 is a root of an irreducible polynomial GLr(A)\mathrm{GL}_r(A)23 and GLr(A)\mathrm{GL}_r(A)24, then GLr(A)\mathrm{GL}_r(A)25 yields a modular form for congruence subgroups such as GLr(A)\mathrm{GL}_r(A)26 or GLr(A)\mathrm{GL}_r(A)27 with character induced by evaluation at GLr(A)\mathrm{GL}_r(A)28 (Pellarin et al., 2016). Hyperdifferentiation in GLr(A)\mathrm{GL}_r(A)29 and subsequent specialization extend this interpolation to higher prime-power levels (Pellarin et al., 2016). The same paper states an equivalent characterization of the growth condition at infinity in terms of modularity of infinitely many specializations (Pellarin et al., 2016).

The analytic theory for representations of the first kind establishes finite dimensionality: GLr(A)\mathrm{GL}_r(A)30 with vanishing in negative weight and further weight-one bounds (Pellarin, 2019). This result uses both specialization at roots of unity and the field of uniformisers (Pellarin, 2019). It shows that vectoriality enlarges the coefficient category and representation theory without destroying the finiteness properties expected of automorphic objects.

Hecke operators persist throughout the theory. In rank two over Tate algebras, the Hecke action preserves the submodule of vectorial modular forms, and the vectorial Eisenstein series GLr(A)\mathrm{GL}_r(A)31 are Hecke eigenforms with eigenvalue GLr(A)\mathrm{GL}_r(A)32 (Pellarin et al., 2016). In Pellarin’s analytic theory, generalized Hecke operators are defined for representations of the first kind by double coset formulas such as

GLr(A)\mathrm{GL}_r(A)33

and differential operators

GLr(A)\mathrm{GL}_r(A)34

provide vectorial analogues of Serre-type higher derivatives (Pellarin, 2019).

6. Higher-rank developments and arithmetic structure

Higher-rank scalar theory supplies several ingredients that have become structural for vectorial work. The paper on arbitrary-rank analytic theory establishes the GLr(A)\mathrm{GL}_r(A)35-expansion, recursion to lower rank, and the definition of modular and cusp forms at all cusps (Basson et al., 2018). The companion examples paper constructs Eisenstein series, coefficient forms, discriminant forms, and Hecke operators in arbitrary rank, and in the case GLr(A)\mathrm{GL}_r(A)36 shows that the ring GLr(A)\mathrm{GL}_r(A)37 is generated by certain weight one Eisenstein series, while GLr(A)\mathrm{GL}_r(A)38 and GLr(A)\mathrm{GL}_r(A)39 are generated by coefficient forms and discriminant forms (Basson et al., 2018). These scalar generation theorems are repeatedly used as the background algebra over which vectorial modules are built.

Hecke theory in higher rank exhibits explicit interaction with GLr(A)\mathrm{GL}_r(A)40-expansions. For simple Hecke operators GLr(A)\mathrm{GL}_r(A)41, the action on

GLr(A)\mathrm{GL}_r(A)42

is given by a formula involving both scaled terms GLr(A)\mathrm{GL}_r(A)43 and Goss polynomials attached to finite lattices (Basson, 2023). The same paper states that Hecke operators preserve modular forms, cusp forms, and double cusp forms, and highlights the relevance of coefficient forms, viewed there as inherently vector-valued components of higher-rank modular data (Basson, 2023). It also proves complete multiplicativity for a natural class of Hecke operators and determines the eigenvalue of the discriminant function GLr(A)\mathrm{GL}_r(A)44 (Basson, 2023).

Boundary theory adds a global arithmetic layer. For rank GLr(A)\mathrm{GL}_r(A)45, expansions of discriminant forms GLr(A)\mathrm{GL}_r(A)46 along boundary divisors admit product formulas analogous to Jacobi’s classical formula, and the orders of vanishing are expressed by values of partial zeta functions at GLr(A)\mathrm{GL}_r(A)47 (Gekeler, 2023). The same work proves linear independence of Eisenstein series GLr(A)\mathrm{GL}_r(A)48 and obtains decompositions

GLr(A)\mathrm{GL}_r(A)49

for suitable weights (Gekeler, 2023). Although vectorial forms are not the main subject there, the paper states that this expansion theory provides the analytic underpinning for vector-valued Drinfeld modular forms (Gekeler, 2023).

A longer-term extension of the field is visible in the 2025 family of Hecke eigenforms. That paper explicitly describes itself as developing the theory of vectorial Drinfeld modular forms for arbitrary rank by using a particular representation and constructing determinant Hecke eigenforms from twisted Eisenstein series (Gezmiş et al., 25 Sep 2025). This suggests a transition from an originally rank-two theory toward a coherent arbitrary-rank representation-theoretic framework.

7. Scope, misconceptions, and open directions

Several points clarify the current scope of the subject. First, vectorial Drinfeld modular forms are not simply an alternative notation for several scalar modular forms written in a column. The cited works emphasize representations, Banach algebra coefficients, and specializations that produce modular forms for congruence subgroups with character; these features go beyond coordinatewise repetition of scalar theory (Pellarin et al., 2016, Pellarin, 2019).

Second, the theory is not confined to rank two, but the mature parts of the literature remain unevenly distributed. Rank two is the setting of the complete structure theorem over Tate algebras, explicit Hecke stability, root-of-unity specialization, and much of the deformation theory [(Pellarin et al., 2016); (Pellarin, 2011)]. Arbitrary-rank scalar theory is already extensive [(Basson et al., 2018); (Basson et al., 2018); (Pink, 2010)], while arbitrary-rank vectorial theory is developed more recently through determinant constructions, particular representations, and Hecke eigenforms [(Perkins, 2014); (Gezmiş et al., 25 Sep 2025)].

Third, some parts of the theory remain conjectural. Pellarin’s analytic theory proves a harmonic product formula for special representations GLr(A)\mathrm{GL}_r(A)50 and, together with three conjectures on the structure of an GLr(A)\mathrm{GL}_r(A)51-algebra of GLr(A)\mathrm{GL}_r(A)52-periodic multiple sums, derives conjectural formulas for Eisenstein series; some of these formulas can be proved (Pellarin, 2019). This is a controlled conjectural zone rather than a gap in the basic definitions.

The published literature identifies several directions of development. One direction is harmonic cocycle theory and explicit descriptions of modular forms as sections over analytic quotients; another is connection with GLr(A)\mathrm{GL}_r(A)53-functions, Galois representations, and Iwasawa-theoretic questions, as indicated in the course notes on the transition from the Carlitz exponential to vector modular forms (Pellarin, 2019). Another is the sheaf-theoretic extension from line bundles to higher-rank automorphic bundles on compactified moduli spaces, foreshadowed in the Satake-compactification framework (Pink, 2010). A further direction is the systematic production of Hecke eigenforms in arbitrary rank through determinants of twisted Eisenstein series and their relation to Anderson generating functions and the Anderson–Thakur function (Gezmiş et al., 25 Sep 2025).

Taken together, the literature presents vectorial Drinfeld modular forms as a characteristic-GLr(A)\mathrm{GL}_r(A)54, non-Archimedean analogue of vector-valued automorphic forms, but one with distinctive analytic mechanisms: Tate algebra coefficients, Frobenius-twisted recurrences, wild ramification in the field of uniformisers, specialization at roots of unity, and determinant constructions tied to Drinfeld and Anderson modules [(Pellarin, 2019); (Pellarin, 2011)]. The subject is therefore both an extension of classical modular ideas and a specifically function-field theory with its own representation-theoretic and arithmetic geometry.

Topic to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this topic yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this topic yet.

Follow Topic

Get notified by email when new papers are published related to Vectorial Drinfeld Modular Forms.