Upsample Anything Framework

• Upsample anything frameworks are universal, task-agnostic operators that restore low-resolution features to high-resolution outputs using adaptive kernels and attention mechanisms.
• They employ techniques such as anisotropic Gaussian filtering, dynamic attention, and implicit coordinate networks to maintain edge-aware and semantically aligned upsampling.
• These methods offer plug-and-play compatibility across various architectures, boosting performance in dense prediction, segmentation, and generative modeling tasks.

An upsample anything framework refers to a universal, model-agnostic, and task-agnostic approach to restoring low-resolution features or signals—such as deep network feature maps, probability maps, or images—to high-resolution outputs, typically for use in dense prediction, generation, or downstream interpretability. Recent advances have unified and substantially improved the accuracy, generalization, and deployability of feature upsampling modules across architectures and modalities, making them a standard element in modern vision pipelines. Below, key frameworks and methodologies from the literature are synthesized, emphasizing operator design, optimization strategies, and empirical benchmarks.

1. Mathematical Foundations and Operator Classes

A central theme is the realization of upsampling as a generalized operator over signals or features, often instantiated as parameterized filter banks, spatial attention, locally conditioned convolutions, or adaptive sampling. The goal is to provide both edge-aware guidance and topological consistency as features are upsampled from a coarse grid $\mathcal Q$ (e.g., $16\!\times\!16$) to a fine grid $\Omega$ (e.g., $224\!\times\!224$).

• Anisotropic Gaussian Filtering: The Upsample Anything framework (Seo et al., 20 Nov 2025) introduces per-pixel anisotropic Gaussian kernels with explicit orientation ($\theta$), spatial scales ($\sigma_x$, $\sigma_y$), and a guidance-aware range parameter ($\sigma_r$). The upsampled signal at each high-resolution pixel $p$ is rendered as

$$F_{hr}(p) = \sum_{q\in\Omega(p)} w_{p\leftarrow q} F_{lr}(q),$$

where $w_{p\leftarrow q}$ is the normalized joint spatial-range kernel centered at LR coordinate $q$ and evaluated at HR location $p$.

• Dynamic Attention and Sampling: Approaches such as DySample (Liu et al., 2023) formulate upsampling as learned point sampling using content-aware offsets, realized efficiently via differentiable grid sampling (PyTorch's grid_sample). The sampling grid is displaced by learned dynamic offsets, permitting fine adjustment to content boundaries.
• Similarity-driven and Feature-aligned Kernels: The ReSFU framework (Zhou et al., 2 Jul 2024) leverages a similarity-based weighted aggregation, aligning high-resolution "query" features and low-resolution "key" features semantically and in detail. Similarity scores are computed using a parameterized, learnable paired central difference convolution (PCDC), which is more expressive and locally sensitive than inner product mechanisms.
• Index-based and Adaptive Masking: IndexNet (Lu et al., 2019) recasts standard and learnable upsamplers as index functions conditioned on the feature map, unifying bilinear, nearest, and unpooling operations under a learnable masking approach. The index maps are normalized and applied to control local information flow during both up- and downsampling.
• Feature-agnostic Attention: Methods such as AnyUp (Wimmer et al., 14 Oct 2025) abstract away encoder-specific feature layout by mapping input features to a canonical space via feature-agnostic convolutional layers, then performing local windowed attention between the high-resolution input and the upsampled features to achieve flexible, model-independent upsampling.

2. Optimization Strategies and Learning Paradigms

The upsample anything paradigm includes both parametric and test-time optimization approaches.

• Test-Time Optimization (TTO): In frameworks such as Upsample Anything (Seo et al., 20 Nov 2025), Gaussian kernel parameters are optimized per image under an $\ell_1$ reconstruction loss on the HR guidance, without requiring dataset-specific training or head reconfiguration. This yields a universal, per-pixel operator that generalizes across modalities and architectures, running in ≈0.42 s for 224×224 images.
• Implicit Coordinate Networks: FeatUp-Implicit (Fu et al., 15 Mar 2024) overfits a small MLP with Fourier-embedded coordinates and color information using NeRF-style multi-view consistency loss, enabling resolution-free upsampling by predicting HR features at arbitrary spatial coordinates.
• Feed-forward and Learned Attention: Learned upsamplers such as FeatUp-Direct, AnyUp, and ReSFU are trained end-to-end, often on random crops or by reconstructing downsampled views, with losses that combine pixel-space reconstruction (e.g., MSE, cosine) and self-consistency or feature-manifold regularization.
• Attention-based Windowed Decoders: WAU (Li et al., 2021) and AnyUp deploy local attention mechanisms between HR queries and LR keys/values, restricting computational scope to manageable spatial windows, which balances expressivity and efficiency.

3. Architectural Integration and Applicability

Modern upsample anything frameworks are designed for maximum applicability and ease of integration:

• Plug-and-Play Compatibility: Methods are typically modular, requiring only a replacement of standard Interpolate, ConvTranspose2d, or bilinear upsampling calls in any decoder, FPN, or U-Net style architecture. No retraining or head changes are needed for per-image TTO schemes (Seo et al., 20 Nov 2025).
• Backbone and Feature-type Agnosticism: Frameworks such as AnyUp, Upsample Anything, and FeatUp are validated across CNNs, vision transformers (ViT, DINO, CLIP), and self-supervised models. This generality is achieved through encoder-agnostic canonicalization and attention design, or via test-time kernel optimization.
• Dense Prediction and Beyond: Applicability now spans dense semantic segmentation, depth or normal estimation, class activation map generation, and even generative modeling (e.g., region-adaptive upsampling for diffusion transformers (Jeong et al., 11 Jul 2025)).

4. Empirical Performance and Benchmark Results

State-of-the-art upsample anything frameworks consistently outperform both fixed interpolators and earlier learned methods across standard benchmarks:

Method	Segmentation (mIoU, COCO)	Depth RMSE (NYUv2)	Notes
Bilinear	60.43	0.545	Baseline
DySample-S+	43.6 (ADE20K, SegFormer)	0.393	Best mIoU for SegFormer-B1
Upsample Anything	61.41	0.498	TTO, universal, 0.42 s runtime
AnyUp	62.16	0.4755	Feature-agnostic, attention-based, single training
FeatUp-JBU	68.77 (Accuracy, COCO)	1.09	On par with segmentation-specific upsamplers
ReSFU	45.2–55.3 (ADE20K–COCO)	—	Validated on multiple architectures and datasets

Ablation studies demonstrate that:

• Adaptive per-pixel kernels substantially outperform isotropic or fixed filters;
• Windowed attention and group-wise dynamic sampling improve both accuracy and computational efficiency;
• Regularization (e.g., TV for implicit MLPs, or input/self-consistency for AnyUp) stabilizes training and mitigates drift from the semantic feature manifold.

5. Specializations and Accelerated Architectures

Emergent use cases include generative diffusion models and rapid inference contexts:

• Region-Adaptive Latent Upsampling (RALU): This approach achieves up to $7\times$ inference acceleration on large transformers by performing region-specific upsampling in the latent space, guided by edge-detected masks and stabilized via noise-timestep rescheduling. No retraining is required, and integration with existing temporal token-caching methods is seamless (Jeong et al., 11 Jul 2025).
• Minimal Overhead Designs: DySample achieves high accuracy with only 49K–100K parameters and negligible memory or backward time penalty, using purely primitive sampling and convolution operations.

6. Conceptual Synthesis and Theoretical Connections

Upsample anything frameworks systematically unify previous approaches:

• Gaussian Splatting and Joint Bilateral Upsampling: The GSJBU operator (Seo et al., 20 Nov 2025) subsumes both classical joint bilateral upsampling (fixed isotropic kernels) and 2D Gaussian splatting (arbitrary anisotropy but no guidance).
• Attention as Local Filtering: Many modern operators exploit local attention across spatial neighborhoods, interpretable as dynamic spatial kernels.
• Index-based and Adaptive Aggregation: IndexNet formalizes both classic up- and downsampling as parameterized index functions, revealing a continuum from static to fully learnable adaptive resampling.

7. Implementation Notes and Deployment Guidelines

• Practical Use: For direct deployment, plug the chosen operator in place of standard upsampling at each decoder stage. Hyperparameters such as kernel size, group count, and dynamic scope factor can be tuned but default values (e.g., $K=3$, $g=4$ for DySample, $T=50$ for TTO) are near-optimal.
• Interoperability: No operator requires custom CUDA; the vast majority are implementable in PyTorch using standard routines.
• Scalability: Methods such as Upsample Anything and DySample scale linearly in space and time, making them suitable for high-resolution applications.

---

Upsample anything frameworks now constitute a core component of dense prediction and generation architectures, characterized by operator generality, minimal tuning, encoder- and task-agnostic implementation, and robust performance under both supervised training and test-time optimization. The progression from fixed resampling to adaptive, feature-aligned, and attention-mediated kernels captures the state of the art in learnable, universal feature upsampling (Seo et al., 20 Nov 2025, Wimmer et al., 14 Oct 2025, Zhou et al., 2 Jul 2024, Liu et al., 2023, Fu et al., 15 Mar 2024, Li et al., 2021, Jeong et al., 11 Jul 2025, Lu et al., 2019).