TopoNet Architecture for Scalable Interconnects

• TopoNet Architecture is a network design framework based on finite projective plane combinatorics that produces highly symmetric, low-diameter interconnection topologies.
• It employs generalized Moore graphs and rigorous cost models to optimize router radix constraints, ensuring scalability and low latency in exascale systems.
• Its practical applications span exascale computing and autonomous systems, where the modular design mitigates traffic imbalances and minimizes per-node cost.

The term "TopoNet Architecture" is used contextually in several leading fields—including parallel computer systems, deep image segmentation, scene understanding for autonomous driving, and topological deep learning for network modeling. The following article synthesizes the TopoNet concept with emphasis on its most rigorous formulation: highly symmetric, cost-effective interconnection topologies for large parallel computer systems, as developed in the context of "Projective Networks" (Camarero et al., 2015).

1. Definition and Foundations of TopoNet Architecture

TopoNet Architecture denotes a network design framework predicated on topological and combinatorial principles, most notably realized via the incidence graphs of finite projective planes. In the canonical setting, as described in "Projective Networks: Topologies for Large Parallel Computer Systems" (Camarero et al., 2015), TopoNet refers to the deployment of highly symmetric generalized Moore graphs for the interconnection of parallel compute nodes. Each router and link corresponds to algebraic constructs—"points" and "lines"—within a finite projective plane, yielding network topologies with near-optimal average distance and uniform link utilization.

Let $G_q$ denote the incidence graph of a finite projective plane over $\mathbb{F}_q$ (the finite field with %%%%2%%%% elements). The vertex set is

$$V = \{ (s, P) : s \in \{0,1\}, P \in P_2(\mathbb{F}_q) \}$$

and edges connect $(0, P)$ and $(1, L)$ if $P \perp L$ (incidence). Such construction produces a symmetric, bipartite graph with $2q^2 + 2q + 2$ vertices and well-characterized diameter.

2. Mathematical Model and Structural Properties

The TopoNet model builds directly upon generalized Moore graphs, closely approaching the theoretical Moore bound for minimum graph diameter at fixed degree:

• Vertex Count: $2q^2 + 2q + 2$
• Diameter: 3 (for $G_q$), 2 (modified/Brown graph variant)
• Average Path Length: Approaching 2.5 (for $G_q$)
• Symmetry and Link Utilization: $u = 1$ for $G_q$; near $u = \frac{8}{9}$ for slim fly MMS architectures

The cost model for attaching compute nodes per router is formalized as

$\Delta_0 \leq \frac{ \Delta u }{ \bar{k} }$

where $\Delta$ is router degree, $u$ the link utilization, and $\bar{k}$ the average network distance. The node cost incorporates per-port and router expenses:

$$C_\text{node} = c_i + c_t \cdot (\bar{k}/u) + c_r \cdot \left( \frac{ 1 + \bar{k}/u }{ R } \right)$$

Minimizing $\bar{k}/u$ is shown to drive low-cost architecture design.

3. Comparative Analysis: Projective Networks vs. Alternatives

The projective networks (TopoNet) paradigm is rigorously compared to complete graphs, Turán graphs, Hamming networks, slim fly MMS, and dragonfly:

• Complete graphs: While optimal in minimal average distance ($\bar{k}=1$), the router radix demand is prohibitive for large systems.
• Slim fly and MMS topologies: Slightly lower diameter but suffer from asymmetrical utilization ($u < 1$), inducing cost inefficiencies under realistic loads.
• Dragonfly and flattened butterfly: These may achieve low average path length but are prone to bottlenecks and nonuniform load distribution.
• Projective Networks (TopoNet): Achieve balanced, full utilization, high scalability (large terminal count per router for fixed radix), and near-optimal average path lengths, especially in the demi-PN (Brown graph) variant.

These tradeoffs are critical in exascale computing scenarios, where cost and power consumption are dominated by interconnection infrastructure.

4. Applications and Deployment Implications

TopoNet Architectures based on projective networks are optimized for exascale-level computing environments—supercomputers and large parallel clusters where balanced load, low latency, and cost minimization are paramount. The high symmetry eliminates hotspots and traffic imbalances common in less structured topologies. The modularity of the underlying projective plane admits partitioning for hierarchical or locality-aware layout, e.g., dividing $G_q$ into subplanes if $q$ is a square.

The incidence graph methodology generalizes to indirect topologies as well, such as Orthogonal Fat Trees (OFT), where the two-level construction inherits near-optimal cost and utilization.

5. Implementation Considerations and Limitations

While TopoNet topologies have superior cost-distance characteristics, several practical constraints exist:

• Router Radix Realizability: Physical router limitations cap achievable $q$ and, thus, the network size.
• Dynamic Traffic Patterns: Symmetry ensures balanced utilization under random traffic, but domain-specific workloads may benefit from tailored variants or hybrid designs.
• Integration with Optical/Electrical Links: Mixed technology environments require refined cost models accounting for differential link costs and router capabilities.
• Simulation and Routing Algorithms: Real-world integration mandates empirical validation. Routing algorithms must leverage the underlying symmetry for performance, with particular attention required in indirect architectures.

6. Research Directions and Extensions

Several promising avenues remain open:

• Refined Cost Modelling: Incorporating heterogeneity in routers and links (electrical vs. optical) for further economic realism.
• Higher-Diameter Designs: Utilizing incidence graphs from higher-order geometric objects (generalized quadrangles, hexagons) for ultra-large-scale networks, though available sizes may be constrained.
• Indirect Topology Extensions: Extending two-level projective designs for scalable fat trees or analogous hierarchical architectures.
• Experimental Validation: Systematic benchmarking and simulation under realistic traffic patterns, including routing algorithm optimization leveraging graph symmetries.

A plausible implication is that TopoNet architectures, given their structured combinatorics, will continue to influence not only exascale system interconnects but emerging domains (e.g., large-scale switchless fabrics, disaggregated compute clusters) as network sizes and performance requirements increase.

---

In sum, TopoNet Architecture synthesizes finite projective plane combinatorics to achieve scalable, low-cost, and topologically balanced interconnection networks, with concrete mathematical foundations and demonstrated superiority over alternative topologies under practical constraints. Its framework extends to both direct and indirect architectures, making it a central paradigm in high-performance computer systems network design (Camarero et al., 2015).