Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
2000 character limit reached

Successive Interference Cancellation (SIC)

Updated 29 November 2025
  • Successive Interference Cancellation (SIC) is a sequential detection technique that subtracts strong interfering signals to progressively enhance weak signal detection.
  • Advanced SIC methods, including MF-SIC and neural/semantic variants, use candidate feedback and adaptive ordering to mitigate error propagation and improve performance.
  • SIC is applied in MIMO, NOMA, optical fiber, and satellite systems, achieving significant throughput gains by balancing detection performance with computational complexity.

Successive interference cancellation (SIC) comprises a broad class of receiver algorithms that mitigate multi-user or multi-signal interference by sequentially detecting and subtracting the strongest interfering signals from the received mixture, thereby progressively enhancing the detectability of weaker signals. SIC is foundational to multiuser detection in wireless, satellite, optical fiber, and random-access networks, and features in the design of contemporary non-orthogonal multiple access (NOMA), multiuser MIMO, random-access, and semantic-communication systems. Below is a comprehensive treatment of SIC methods, their statistical and algorithmic properties, computational trade-offs, and performance impacts based on an extensive survey of technical literature.

1. Fundamental Statistical Framework and System Models

SIC operates by detecting one or more interferers from a received superposition, reconstructing their waveforms, and canceling their contributions prior to decoding the next signal. This process is inherently sequential and lends itself to rigorous analysis using order statistics, stochastic geometry, and Markovian modeling:

  • Heterogeneous Cellular Networks: SIC is modeled in multi-tier cellular topologies as a sequence of decoding events where the nn-th strongest interferer X(n)X(n) is decoded if it exceeds a signal-to-interference ratio (SIR) threshold η\eta, with the network modeled as a superposition of Poisson Point Processes (PPP) for access points and users. After canceling nn interferers, the residual interference comprises an infinite sum over remaining, progressively weaker interferers (Wildemeersch et al., 2013).
  • MU-MIMO and CDMA: In MIMO or CDMA systems, SIC is performed on ordered layers, where each layer applies a linear MMSE or widely linear MMSE filter, followed by hard or soft symbol decisions and interference subtraction, with the layers typically selected according to descending channel gain or SNR (Li et al., 2013, Yang et al., 2014).
  • Optical Communication and Nonlinear ISI Channels: In optical fiber SIC, multistage detection is adapted to phase-noise-limited nonlinear channels, and sequentially detects coded substreams—often using Gaussian message-passing or neural architectures to approximate joint MAP detection (Jäger et al., 22 Mar 2024, Jäger et al., 6 May 2024, Plabst et al., 17 Jan 2024).
  • Random-Access and Ad Hoc Networks: Random access schemes exploit SIC by buffering collision residues, then, upon successful subsequent decodings, running cross-slot or cross-beam cancellation to recover further packets, captured analytically by Markov models (Clazzer et al., 2013, Zhang et al., 2020, Wei et al., 2023, Jeon et al., 2020).
  • MAC-Layer Incorporation: In distributed MAC designs, such as CSMA-SIC, scheduling adapts to the SIC capacity region, modeled as the convex hull of feasible SIC decodable sets, with distributed algorithms ensuring that the empirical link throughputs approach any admissible rate vector (Mollanoori, 2015).

2. Algorithmic Variants and Enhanced SIC Schemes

Several enhancements to baseline SIC have been developed to address error propagation, nonlinearity, and complex multiuser channel conditions:

  • Multiple Feedback SIC (MF-SIC): For each symbol layer, if the tentative decision metric is unreliable (as determined by a shadow area constraint, SAC), MF-SIC considers several (M) nearest constellation candidates. The most likely candidate, by residual Euclidean metric, is then selected, reducing error propagation (Li et al., 2013).
  • Improved MF-SIC (IMF-SIC): IMF-SIC recursively re-applies the SAC at each subsequent symbol in a candidate feedback path, further suppressing propagation of detection errors across layers, and is coupled with dynamic (LLR-based) layer ordering to approach near-ML performance in large MIMO symbols (Mandloi et al., 2015).
  • Multi-branch and Ordering Diversity: MB-MF-SIC structures run several MF-SIC detectors with different ordering permutations and choose the one minimizing the overall metric. This increases the "detection diversity" and improves average error rates especially in overloaded regimes (Li et al., 2013).
  • Activity-aware SIC (AA-MF-SIC): Incorporates user activity priors into the reliability threshold (SAC), making multiple feedback selective and computationally efficient for massive machine-type communication (mMTC) (Renna et al., 2019).
  • Widely-linear and Vector-Space–Projection Enhanced SIC: These preprocess the received multiuser mixture via vector-space projections (for jamming suppression) and widely-linear augmented MMSE filters (to deal with improper signal statistics), e.g., for BPSK DS-CDMA in the presence of jamming, significantly improving robustness at moderate complexity (Yang et al., 2014).
  • Neural and Data-driven SIC: Deep neural networks have been proposed to replace classical hard-decision cancellation, learning soft symbol likelihoods and interference patterns directly from received vectors. These methods (e.g., SICNet) are robust to imperfect CSI and nonlinear hardware effects and yield improved soft outputs for FEC decoding (2207.14468, Plabst et al., 17 Jan 2024).
  • Semantic SIC: Extends SIC into the semantic layer, working in word-embedding space rather than the symbol or bit domain, and leverages previously decoded semantic content as side information, thus providing resilience to interference in multi-user natural language transmission (Li et al., 19 Jan 2025).

3. Performance Analysis, Statistical Gains, and Limitations

The effectiveness of SIC depends on the system topology, channel environment, and association policy. Quantitative analyses have characterized performance decrements or saturation as cancellation depth increases:

  • Coverage and Decoding Probabilities: In Poissonian cellular models, for a given SIR threshold η\eta, the probability of successfully canceling the nn-th strongest interferer, Ps,can(η,n)P_{s,\mathrm{can}}(\eta,n), decays exponentially with nn:

Ps,can(η,n)=[1+η2/αC(η2/α,α)]nP_{s,\mathrm{can}}(\eta,n) = \left[1 + \eta^{2/\alpha} C\left(\eta^{-2/\alpha},\alpha\right)\right]^{-n}

where C(,α)C(\cdot,\alpha) is a path-loss-integral (tail of interference) (Wildemeersch et al., 2013).

  • Diminishing Returns: The aggregate probability of successful decoding after nn cancellations, P(η,n)P(\eta, n), increases most significantly for the first one or two cancellations: the initial canceled interferer typically yields 80 ⁣ ⁣90%80\!-\!90\% of the possible SIC gain; additional cancellations beyond n=2n=2 usually have negligible benefit except in extreme or highly loaded regimes (Wildemeersch et al., 2013, Abu-Shaban et al., 2014).
  • Association Policy Impacts: SIC delivers the largest improvements under range expansion (biased association for small-cell offloading), minimum-load association (load-aware policy), or maximum-instantaneous SIR association policies. In standard maximum-power association (macrocells), the gains are marginal for realistic SIR values (Wildemeersch et al., 2013).
  • Random Access and Ad Hoc Performance: In slotted ALOHA and related schemes, the maximum achievable throughput under unlimited SIC is 0.693\approx0.693 packets per slot (Yu–Giannakis bound). With SIC limited to $2$ or $3$ packets, $0.56$ and $0.63$ packts/slot (80% and 91% of the theoretical maximum) are realized. SIC+MPR in ad hoc neighbor discovery can reduce neighbor-discovery time by up to 69% over conventional CRA/SBA (Jeon et al., 2020, Wei et al., 2023).
  • Optical Fiber/Spectral Efficiency: For 1000 km fiber transmissions, multistage SIC with discrete ring constellations (e.g., 32 rings) achieves achievable information rates (AIRs) within 0.05 bpcu of joint detection and decoding (JDD) with 16 stages; for practical implementation, 2–4 stages already attain close-to-optimal AIRs (Jäger et al., 22 Mar 2024, Jäger et al., 6 May 2024).
  • Non-orthogonal Multiple Access (NOMA): In power-domain NOMA, conventional SIC with CSI-based ordering exhibits an outage floor and sum-rate cap as SNR increases; hybrid SIC schemes that dynamically adapt decoding order based on instantaneous CSI and QoS can eliminate both the outage floor and sum-rate limitation, restoring full diversity and achieving up to 60% higher admitted-user rates at SNR ~20 dB (Ding et al., 2020).

4. Computational Complexity and Design Trade-offs

The core complexity in SIC arises from the need to order, detect, and reconstruct (and possibly feedback or re-order) interfering streams; various enhancements balance performance with tractable complexity:

Scheme Complexity Order Notes
Conventional SIC O(K2NR+K3)O(K^2N_R+K^3) Linear in users, cubic in antennas (MU-MIMO)
MF-/IMF-SIC O(SK2NR)\approx O(SK^2N_R) SS nearest candidates per unreliable stage, SAC for selectivity
MB-MF-SIC O(L×OMFSIC)O(L\times O_{MF-SIC}) LL orderings; diversity at LL-fold cost
JDD/ML Detection O(CK)O(C^K) Exponential in KK; intractable for large KK
Ring-based Optical O(nS)O(nS) nn symbols, SS stages; linear scaling
Random Access SIC O(M2)O(M^2) (per resolve) MM is max SIC depth; low for M=2M=2–$3$ (Jeon et al., 2020)
Widely-Linear MC-SIC 2RN+2MRS2N\sim 2RN + 2MRS^2N Doubled for improper signaling, maintains moderate cost
Neural/DNN SIC O(i=1LNi2)O(\sum_{i=1}^L N_{i}^2) Hidden-layer size NiN_i, parallelizable, moderate below K=16K=16

Empirical studies confirm only a few unreliable symbol layers require multiple feedback; carefully set SACs, activity awareness, or reliability thresholds achieve near-optimal performance with marginal cost (Li et al., 2013, Mandloi et al., 2015, Renna et al., 2019, Yang et al., 2014).

5. Applications and Extensions in Modern Networks

SIC techniques have proliferated across communication domains as a countermeasure to fundamentally interference-limited regimes or as an enabling primitive for advanced medium/PHY-layer features:

  • Heterogeneous Cellular and HetNet: SIC is key for realizing cell densification, especially in small-cell and user-centric association contexts (Wildemeersch et al., 2013).
  • Non-Orthogonal Multiple Access (NOMA): SIC is mandatory for power-domain multiplexing but gains are contingent on adaptive ordering and rate allocation protocols (Ding et al., 2020, Zhang et al., 2020). SICNet leverages data-driven learning to improve robustness to imperfect CSI (2207.14468).
  • Random Access (ECRA/ALOHA/IRSA): SIC enables efficient collision resolution; strategic placement of protocol headers (e.g., at packet ends) further enhances throughput by reducing header-loss probability after SIC (Clazzer et al., 2013). SIC-based adaptive random access with online estimation achieves throughput up to the theoretical limit for moderate SIC depth (Jeon et al., 2020).
  • Ad Hoc and Neighbor Discovery: Combining SIC and multi-packet reception (MPR) drastically reduces collision-induced delays and improves neighbor discovery rates by more than 60% in dense topologies (Wei et al., 2023).
  • Satellite and Overloaded Reception: Hybrid SIC integrating MRC and a compromised array-response (CAR) beamformer outperforms joint ML and MMSE methods in overloaded, spatially correlated satellite links by up to 12 dB (BER at 10310^{-3}) (Abu-Shaban et al., 2014).
  • Optical Fiber/High Spectral Efficiency: Multistage SIC, implemented as ring-based detection coupled with message-passing or neural decoding, achieves the information-theoretic limits in nonlinear, memory-limited fiber links at linear complexity (Jäger et al., 22 Mar 2024, Jäger et al., 6 May 2024, Plabst et al., 17 Jan 2024).
  • Semantic Communication: The "semantic SIC" approach cancels interference in the semantic embedding domain for transformer-based multi-user MACs, outperforming classical symbol-domain SIC, especially when user texts are contextually correlated; efficient pretraining and partial retraining enable dynamic user sets at low training cost (Li et al., 19 Jan 2025).

6. Design Guidelines, Limitations, and Future Challenges

SIC design for practical systems should adhere to established limits and optimization trade-offs:

  • Design Guidelines: Restrict SIC depth to $1$–$2$ per receiver to balance marginal gain and complexity; target non-standard association scenarios—such as range-expansion or minimum-load association—to realize the principal gains of SIC (Wildemeersch et al., 2013). In protocols, place signal headers at packet edges to minimize loss due to residual interference (Clazzer et al., 2013).
  • Limitations: Gains are modest under homogeneous macrocell association and for scenarios where interfering signals are not strongly disparate in power. Error propagation remains a risk without multiple feedback or dynamic ordering. High-complexity variants (e.g., ML, full-branch search) are infeasible for large user or antenna dimensions.
  • Practical Considerations: Accurate channel estimation, phase noise tracking, and time/frequency synchronization remain essential for effective SIC. Neural or semantic domain SIC approaches offer resilience to CSI uncertainty and nonlinearity but require training overhead and inference hardware (Plabst et al., 17 Jan 2024, 2207.14468, Li et al., 19 Jan 2025).
  • Future Directions: Extending SIC to joint detection in multi-domain (space/frequency/code), model-based/data-driven hybrid receivers, semantic layer integration, ultra-massive-multiuser scenarios, and adapting to bursty/heterogeneous traffic or dynamic topology changes are promising research trajectories.

7. Comparative Table: SIC Variants and Their Core Characteristics

SIC Variant Feedback Type Ordering Principle Complexity Key Use Case
Classical SIC Single, hard SNR/Power Low MIMO, NOMA, Cellular
MF-/IMF-SIC Multiple, soft SAC/local reliability Moderate MU-MIMO, mMTC
MB-MF-SIC Multiple branches Diversity permutations High Overloaded MIMO
Widely-Linear MC-SIC Multiple, soft, WL BPSK/Non-circular Moderate CDMA/MAI+Jamming
Hybrid SIC (DL, semantic) Data-driven, context Semantic+symbol ordering Moderate MAC, DeepSC
Neural SIC (SICNet, NN-SIC) Soft, DNN outputs Learned via training Moderate Downlink NOMA, Nonlinear channels
Cross-slot/Random-Access SIC Temporal, buffered Slot-wise power Low/Modest IRSA, ECRA, LoRa, RA
Optical Multistage SIC Coded multistage Ring/phase interleaves Linear/S 1000 km fiber ISI/nonlinearity

This table summarizes the main features and applications of principal SIC variants as discussed in the literature.


The rigorous statistical treatment of SIC across heterogeneous wireless, optical, satellite, and semantic networks confirms its centrality in multiuser interference mitigation, with advances in candidate selection, feedback management, adaptive ordering, and neural/semantic integration extending its applicability to ever denser or more heterogeneous connectivity regimes. The careful calibration of SIC depth, candidate granularity, ordering logic, and downstream integration remains essential for achieving near-ML performance within tractable computational budgets across diverse platforms.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (17)
Slide Deck Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Whiteboard

Forward Email Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow Topic

Get notified by email when new papers are published related to Successive Interference Cancellation (SIC) Methods.