Spatial Linear Dark Field Control (sLDFC)

• Spatial Linear Dark Field Control (sLDFC) is a wavefront sensing technique that maintains deep stellar nulls by using linear intensity variations in adjacent bright field regions.
• It leverages a calibrated interaction matrix and deformable mirror corrections to restore high-contrast dark holes quickly and efficiently during science exposures.
• Laboratory and on-sky tests demonstrate that sLDFC enhances exoplanet imaging contrast and reduces calibration overhead compared to classical probing methods.

Spatial Linear Dark Field Control (sLDFC) is a focal-plane wavefront sensing and control methodology designed to maintain deep stellar nulls—“dark holes” (DH)—in high-contrast imaging systems for direct exoplanet detection. sLDFC operates on the principle that intensity variations in the bright field (BF)—the spatial regions outside the DH—respond linearly to small wavefront perturbations, enabling real-time wavefront correction without modulation of the science image. By leveraging the strong signal in the BF and a calibrated interaction matrix, sLDFC stabilizes the DH during science exposure, improving operational duty cycle and contrast performance beyond the limits of modulating techniques such as electric field conjugation (EFC).

1. Fundamental Physical Principles

Spatial LDFC builds upon the observation that, once an initial dark hole is established using conventional approaches (e.g., EFC), photon-rich BF regions exhibit a linear response to small aberrations that simultaneously degrade the DH. The underlying model expresses the focal-plane electric field at time $t$ as the sum of the unperturbed nominal field $E_0$ and the DM-induced perturbation $E_\text{DM}$: $E_t \approx E_0 + E_\text{DM}$ The corresponding intensity is

$$I_t = |E_t|^2 \approx |E_0|^2 + |E_\text{DM}|^2 + 2\operatorname{Re}(E_0, E_\text{DM})$$

In the BF, where $|E_0|^2 \gg |E_\text{DM}|^2$, the intensity change relative to the reference (established at DH formation) is dominated by the cross-term: $$\Delta I_\text{BF} \equiv I_t - I_\mathrm{ref} \approx 2\operatorname{Re}(E_0, E_\text{DM})$$ This near-linear dependence underpins the sLDFC operating principle. Control is enacted by monitoring $\Delta I_\text{BF}$ across selected pixels and computing DM corrections that restore the BF (and by extension the DH) to its nominal state.

2. Control Loop Architecture and Mathematical Framework

The sLDFC control architecture comprises the following critical elements:

• Calibration: A response (or interaction) matrix $M$ is empirically built by individually “poking” DM actuators and recording the BF response for each actuator. Only those BF pixels above a signal threshold are incorporated to ensure linearity.
• Error Signal: At each iteration, a science detector image is acquired, and the pixelwise intensity difference $\Delta I_\text{BF}$ with respect to the reference is calculated.
• Control Law: The correction to the DM commands, $u_t$, at iteration $t$ is computed using the pseudo-inverse of the response matrix: $$u_t = - (M^\mathrm{T}M)^{-1} M^\mathrm{T} \Delta I_\text{BF}$$ This algorithm implements a closed feedback loop, ensuring wavefront stability in the DH without directly modulating or probing the dark field itself.

3. Experimental Demonstration and Simulation Outcomes

In laboratory tests (Ames Coronagraph Experiment, ACE) and on-sky demonstrations (Subaru/SCExAO), sLDFC has been shown to restore and maintain DH contrast following deliberate perturbations:

• Simulations with sine-wave (1 nm PTV, 6 cycles/aperture) and Kolmogorov phase error (20.5 nm PTV) led to rapid restoration of $10^{-8}$-level DH contrast within $\sim$6 iterations (Miller et al., 2017).
• Laboratory demonstrations achieved restoration of DHs degraded by factors of 5–10 to within $1.2\times$–$1.7\times$ of their initial contrast, typically requiring fewer DM commands and iterations compared to classical speckle nulling, which needed $\sim$2–5$\times$ more iterations and $20$–$50\times$ more DM perturbations (Currie et al., 2020).
• On-sky testing at Subaru/SCExAO with an asymmetric-pupil vector-Apodizing Phase Plate (APvAPP) produced a factor $3$–$7$ improvement in raw contrast over the DH and reduced RMS wavefront error by $\sim$50 nm (from $\sim$90 nm to $\sim$40 nm). sLDFC also suppressed evolving aberrations with timescales $<0.1$–$0.4$ Hz, as shown by power spectral density measurements (Bos et al., 2021).

4. Implementation Strategies and Acquisition Protocols

sLDFC requires precise calibration of the BF response matrix and careful selection of BF pixels:

• Calibration is performed with DM sine-wave “pokes”—amplitudes are kept in the linear regime (order 0.1 nm PTV)—and ΔI measurements form the matrix columns (Poon et al., 2023).
• To avoid dynamic range saturation in detectors (e.g., EMCCD on the Roman Coronagraph), several strategies are developed: running sLDFC on localized DH regions with reduced dynamic range, exploiting shaped-pupil coronagraphs with increased IWA, or pre-attenuating the stellar halo prior to sLDFC operation (Currie et al., 10 Sep 2025).
• Iterative modal control schemes are used, employing SVD regularization of the response matrix and applying leak matrices to enhance stability in the correction loop.

5. Comparative Analysis: sLDFC versus Classical Probing Methods

Relative to EFC and classical speckle nulling/wavefront probing:

• sLDFC operates with a 100% duty cycle, preserving uninterrupted science exposures.
• Classical probing mandates temporal modulation, requiring multiple exposures and disturbing the DH during correction.
• Quantitatively, sLDFC achieves equivalent or superior DH restoration with an order of magnitude fewer DM actuations and iterations (Currie et al., 2020, Poon et al., 2023).
• sLDFC exploits the superlinear photon flux in the BF, increasing signal-to-noise and facilitating robust correction even in low-flux regimes typical of exoEarth imaging.

6. Limitations, Null Spaces, and Complementary Approaches

Two critical limitations of sLDFC are noted:

• Null Spaces: Certain wavefront errors produce changes in the DH without corresponding BF variations. These include phase/amplitude combinations with spatial symmetries or relative phase shifts cancelling BF response (Miller et al., 2017, Currie et al., 2019).
• DH/BF Asymmetry Requirement: Effective operation requires a spatially non-symmetric DH adjacent to a photon-rich BF; symmetric DHs or configurations with insufficient BF limit sLDFC utility.
• A suggested resolution is complementing spatial LDFC with spectral LDFC, which uses out-of-band wavelengths as the BF and can cover null spaces inherent in spatial-only schemes (Guyon et al., 2017, Poon et al., 2023).

7. Impacts on Exoplanet Imaging and Future Directions

sLDFC is central to next-generation exoplanet imaging:

• Laboratory and on-sky results confirm restoration and maintenance of DHs at $10^{-7}$–$10^{-8}$ contrast levels, approaching requirements for imaging giant planets and laying the foundation for future $10^{-10}$ exoEarth characterization (Miller et al., 2017, Currie et al., 2020, Bos et al., 2021, Currie et al., 10 Sep 2025).
• Enhanced temporal speckle correlation in the DH, enabled by rapid correction, improves post-processing contrast and detection limits for bright targets—gains of an order of magnitude have been reported in vacuum testbeds (Currie et al., 10 Sep 2025).
• sLDFC’s continuous, linear correction framework reduces operational overhead and relaxes periodic calibration constraints (e.g., reference star acquisition).
• Ongoing studies include integrating spectral LDFC, expanding the calibration basis to correct a broader class of aberrations, and deploying sLDFC in systems with complex detector dynamic range limitations (Roman Coronagraph) (Currie et al., 10 Sep 2025).

References to Key Research

• JPL, NASA, ACE Laboratory, Subaru/SCExAO, and the Roman Coronagraph teams have contributed experimental and simulation validation of sLDFC concepts (Miller et al., 2017, Currie et al., 2019, Currie et al., 2020, Bos et al., 2021, Poon et al., 2023, Currie et al., 10 Sep 2025).
• sLDFC is referenced as a critical advancement relative to traditional EFC, speckle nulling, and pairwise probe-based WFSC.

---

Spatial Linear Dark Field Control thus constitutes a foundational paradigm for real-time, non-invasive wavefront maintenance in high-contrast coronagraphic imaging, directly impacting hardware requirements, operational duty cycles, and detection limits in contemporary and future exoplanet direct imaging campaigns.