Sharp Reverse Inequality
- Sharp reverse inequalities are precise bounds that invert classical monotonicity and convexity inequalities by providing optimal constants and characterizing unique extremal scenarios.
- They are fundamental tools in areas like convex geometry, probability theory, and operator analysis, with applications ranging from reverse Hölder and Minkowski inequalities to reverse Cheeger and Lieb–Thirring inequalities.
- Recent advances illustrate how phase transitions and rigidity in extremizers, such as symmetric Laplace or one-sided exponential distributions, drive sharper quantitative bounds in complex analysis.
A sharp reverse inequality is a precise, usually extremal, quantitative bound that inverts the direction of a classical monotonicity or convexity-based inequality and gives the optimal constant in the reversed setting. Such inequalities typically characterize the worst-case scenario in function spaces, probability theory, convex geometry, spectral theory, and operator analysis by determining when a reverse comparison holds and by identifying extremizing distributions or objects. Recent advances reveal deep connections to phase-transition phenomena, geometric structure, convex measures, and probabilistic localization methods.
1. Conceptual Framework and Notation
Sharp reverse inequalities arise when standard monotonicity relations—such as Hölder's, Minkowski's, or operator mean inequalities—are reversed on a domain endowed with convexity, symmetry, or concentration structure. Let be a function, a random variable or set, and denote the or analogous norm.
A prototypical form is: where and is an explicit, generally optimal constant, typically attained by a distinguished class of extremal objects (e.g., log-concave densities, power distributions, or linear operators under spectral constraint).
Notable domains include:
- Centred log-concave random variables and negative moments (Melbourne et al., 2 May 2025)
- Convex bodies and mixed volumes (Hug et al., 2019)
- Muckenhoupt and weights (Hytönen et al., 2012, Parissis et al., 2016, Canto, 2018, Ortiz-Caraballo et al., 2012)
- Operator means in matrix analysis (Furuichi et al., 2018)
- Polynomials in Bombieri–Weyl norm (Etayo, 2019)
- Hardy–Littlewood–Sobolev structures (Ngô et al., 2015)
- Rényi entropy powers (Li, 2017)
2. Core Sharp Reverse Hölder-Type Inequalities
The recent work by Melbourne–Roysdon–Tang–Tkocz establishes a full continuum of sharp reverse Hölder inequalities for centred log-concave random variables (Melbourne et al., 2 May 2025). For centred and log-concave,
- For :
- For :
with .
There is a unique phase transition at :
- For , the extremal distribution is symmetric Laplace.
- For , the extremal switches to a shifted one-sided exponential.
Related reverse inequalities include:
- – bounds: .
- Two-parameter comparison: for .
The proof technique is underpinned by Webb’s simplex-slicing bounds and localization/smoothing arguments reducing to mixtures of exponential laws.
3. Reverse Inequalities in Geometric and Spectral Analysis
Reverse Cheeger Inequality
For any planar convex domain (Parini, 2015): where is the first Dirichlet eigenvalue, and is the Cheeger constant. The extremal sequence is characterized by elongated domains with fixed area, and the optimal constant is unattainable within the finite-diameter class.
Reverse Minkowski-Type Inequality
For compact convex bodies (Hug et al., 2019): with equality precisely for a segment and a flat body orthogonal to it.
Reverse Bombieri Inequality for Polynomials
For degree- monic polynomials (Etayo, 2019): The bound is asymptotically attained for roots equidistributed on the sphere.
Reverse Lieb–Thirring Inequality
For Schrödinger operators on the half-line with self-adjoint boundary (Weder, 1 May 2024): with a self-adjoint boundary condition and a matrix potential; the $1/4$ is optimal.
4. Reverse Inequalities in Convex and Functional Analysis
Reverse Santaló Inequality for the Polarity Transform
For even geometric log-concave functions with polarity (Artstein-Avidan et al., 2013): where is the Bourgain–Milman constant and is explicit. Extremizers correspond to convex bodies via indicator functions.
5. Sharp Reverse Properties in Weighted and Operator Theory
Reverse Hölder properties now admit sharp quantitative exponents and constants in weighted settings, notably for:
- and weights (Hytönen et al., 2012, Parissis et al., 2016, Canto, 2018):
where and are explicit as functions of the characteristic, and become optimal as the weight flattens.
- Operator means (Furuichi et al., 2018):
with sharp arising as extrema of scalar functions over the spectrum range . These bounds propagate to Tsallis entropy and operator monotone map inequalities.
6. Reverse Inequality Structures in Information Theory and Harmonic Analysis
Reversed Rényi Entropy Power Inequality
For independent random vectors with Rényi entropies (Li, 2017):
- Forward: with sharp .
- Reverse: For or , provided underlying measures are -concave with .
Connections to convex bodies (intersection, centroid bodies) undergird the conjectured wider validity.
Reverse Young's Convolution Inequality on Hypercube (Beltran et al., 8 Jul 2025)
For $0 < r < 1$, the sharp reverse Young holds: with ; the extremal is the indicator of the cube.
7. Phase Transitions, Rigidity, and Extremals
Numerous sharp reverse inequalities reveal a phase transition of extremizers as the parameter crosses a critical value (see log-concave moment case at (Melbourne et al., 2 May 2025)). Rigidity phenomena arise: maximal (or minimal) configurations are unique, and near-attainment of equality forces geometric or probabilistic structure (e.g., spherical suspension space for reverse eigenfunction Hölder (Gunes et al., 2021), minimal energy sets for polynomials (Etayo, 2019), extremal segments for mixed volumes (Hug et al., 2019)). Quantitative stability theorems pinpoint how "almost extremal" implies proximity to the canonical extremizer, often measured in Hausdorff or Gromov–Hausdorff metrics.
Conclusion
Sharp reverse inequalities delineate the extremal landscape of inverse monotonicity in analysis, geometry, and probability. They serve both as powerful classification results (via phase transitions, rigidity, and stability) and as actionable tools for bounding functionals in harmonic analysis, convex geometry, spectral theory, operator algebra, and information theory. Ongoing advances continue to uncover the underlying geometric and probabilistic structures, drive improvements in weighted estimates, and probe the connections between convexity, spectral theory, and entropy with sharp constants and characterizations.