Implicit Concave Functions

• Implicit concave functions are a broad class defined via functional transformations, lifting, and operator perspectives that extend classical convexity and log-concavity.
• They generalize traditional notions such as α-concavity and log-concavity, enabling unified geometric, probabilistic, and operator-theoretic analyses.
• Their framework leads to practical applications in signal processing, optimization, and discrete mathematics through duality, regularization techniques, and probabilistic modeling.

Implicit concave functions are a broad and structurally rich class of functions that generalize and unify notions from convex and discrete geometry, probability, operator theory, signal processing, and high-dimensional analysis. Their “implicitness” arises from definition via functional transformation, lifting, operator perspectives, smoothing, or composition, in all cases yielding concavity not by direct formula but by inherent structural or variational properties. This article surveys major advances in the rigorous understanding and application of implicit concave functions as developed in recent mathematical research.

1. Generalized Concavity: From α-Concave Functions to Operator Perspectives

The theory of implicit concave functions substantially extends classical notions such as log-concavity. The α-concave functions, with parameter α ∈ (–∞,0], are defined so that for every x, y in the convex support and λ ∈ [0,1],

$$f\bigl(\lambda x + (1-\lambda)y\bigr) \geq M_\alpha^{(\lambda,1-\lambda)}\bigl(f(x), f(y)\bigr)$$

where $M_\alpha$ is the α-mean. In the limiting case α → 0, one recovers the log-concave property. The key insight is that much of the geometry of convex sets and log-concave functions—support functions, mean width, Urysohn and Poincaré type inequalities—can be extended to this generalized setting (Rotem, 2012).

For α-concave $f$, the convex base is

$\mathrm{base}(f) = \frac{1 - f^\alpha}{\alpha},$

with Legendre transform $h_f^{(\alpha)} = (\mathrm{base}(f))^*$, generalizing the support function of convex bodies. The mean width $w_\alpha(f)$ is then given as a weighted average of $h_f^{(\alpha)}$ with explicit kernels, and central inequalities (e.g., generalized Urysohn) follow by functional interpolation between convex and log-concave endpoints.

In the noncommutative context, operator concavity (or convexity) plays a parallel role. By lifting scalar concave functions to operator mappings via perspectives, one can define multivariate operator concave and convex functions, with functional calculus replaced by the joint spectrum and Löwner matrices. Such extensions are vital in quantum information theory and matrix analysis, where perspectives provide systematic means to “lift” concavity, allowing implicit concave structure to emerge in operator differentials and trace inequalities (Zhang, 2014).

2. Implicit Shape Constraints and Distributional Concavity

The concept of implicit concavity also arises in distributional constraints, notably with bi-s*-concave distribution functions (Laha et al., 2017, Laha et al., 2020). For a density $f$ that is s-concave, the corresponding distribution function $F$ is shown to be bi-$s^*$-concave, where $s^* = s/(1+s)$. This property is expressed in terms of transformed convexity or concavity:

• For $s<0$, $x\mapsto F(x)^{s^*}$ and $x\mapsto [1-F(x)]^{s^*}$ are convex.
• For $s>0$, $x\mapsto F(x)^{s^*}$ (resp. $x\mapsto [1-F(x)]^{s^*}$) are concave on one-sided subsets.

Crucially, this class includes highly multimodal or heavy-tailed distributions typically outside standard log-concave or s-concave families, while still ensuring key controls such as monotonicity of generalized hazard functions and explicit bounds on the Csörgő–Révész constant,

$$\gamma(F) = \sup_x F(x)(1-F(x)) \cdot \frac{|f'(x)|}{f(x)^2} \leq 1 - s^* = \frac{1}{1+s},$$

which governs rates in quantile process theory and nonparametric confidence bands (Laha et al., 2017, Laha et al., 2020).

3. Geometric Representations and Duality

The geometry of implicit concave functions is often best understood via functional lifts and duality. If $f$ is $1/s$-concave on $\mathbb{R}^d$, the s-lift embeds $f$ as a convex set in $\mathbb{R}^{d+1}$:

$$\mathrm{sLift}\, f = \{(x,\xi) : x \in \mathrm{supp}\, f,\, |\xi| \leq f(x)^{1/s} \}.$$

The s-polar transform,

$$L_sf(y) = \inf_{x \in \mathrm{supp}\, f} \frac{[1-\langle x,y\rangle]_+^s}{f(x)},$$

yields integral representations that connect analytic properties (e.g., convexity of $z \mapsto \int L_s f(z)(y)dy$) with convex geometry (Ivanov et al., 2021). In particular, the reciprocal of the integral of a polar of a log-concave function is log-concave in the center of polarity, generalizing the classical Santaló–Alexandrov theory.

Symmetrization techniques further exhibit extremal properties: the hypo-symmetrization (arising from Minkowski symmetrization across all directions) of a log-concave function is always hardest to approximate by inner log-linearizations, extending classical optimal approximation results for convex bodies to the functional regime (Hoehner, 2023).

4. Implicit Concave Structures in Optimization and Signal Processing

Implicit concave functions are fundamental in nonconvex optimization frameworks, particularly in robust and edge-preserving signal reconstruction. If $f(x) = V(\Phi(x))$ with $V$ strictly concave and $\Phi$ smooth, one can exploit the Fenchel conjugate $V^*$ to reformulate the nonconvex problem

$\min_x V(\Phi(x))$

as

$$\min_{x,\sigma} \langle\Phi(x), \sigma\rangle - V^*(\sigma).$$

This augmented problem reveals biconvexity and allows variable splitting: convexity in each block variable, facilitating efficient block coordinate descent. There is a one-to-one correspondence between stationary points of the original and augmented formulations. In half-quadratic methods for signal and image reconstruction, edge-preserving regularizers such as Huber, logarithmic, or Cauchy penalties are examples of this structure, and the augmented system remains bounded from below, ensuring stability of minimization processes (Latorre, 7 Oct 2025).

5. Random and Probabilistic Models for Implicit Concave Functions

Probability measures on the space of concave functions provide a Bayesian nonparametric framework for modeling complex high-dimensional behaviors. A major construction uses the (soft) minimum over random affine functions on the simplex $\Delta_n$:

$$\Psi_K = a_K \cdot m_\lambda(\ell_1, \dots, \ell_K)$$

where $m_\lambda$ is the mollified minimum and the $\ell_i$ are random hyperplanes. As $K\to\infty$, one obtains limiting distributions characterized by convex duality and Poisson point process structure. These laws serve as priors in convex regression and as generators of stochastic portfolio maps via their gradients, establishing tight connections to optimal transport theory (Baxendale et al., 2019).

Limiting laws, convex dual representations, and the Poisson process mechanisms allow a detailed paper of both almost sure and distributional limits of these "random implicit concave functions," supporting both inference and geometric probabilistic analysis in applications ranging from finance to nonparametric Bayesian statistics.

6. Discrete and Submodular Analogues: Superdifferentials and Polyhedral Representations

In discrete mathematics, submodular functions exhibit an inherent concave structure via diminishing returns. Modular upper bounds and the submodular upper polyhedron,

$$\mathcal{P}^f = \{ x \in \mathbb{R}^n : x(S) \geq f(S), \forall S \subseteq V \},$$

are efficiently characterized for submodular $f$ by singleton inequalities alone. Superdifferentials,

$$\partial^f(X) = \{ x \in \mathbb{R}^n : f(Y) - x(Y) \leq f(X) - x(X) \ \forall Y \},$$

function as discrete analogs of supporting hyperplanes of concave functions, providing tight modular upper bounds. Local and approximate optimality for submodular maximization can then be derived via checking inclusion of the zero vector in easily computable polyhedral relaxations (Iyer et al., 2020).

7. Sector-Specific Instances and Applications

Concave speedup functions, as encountered in optimal parallel scheduling, serve as implicit models of diminishing returns. The CDR (Consistent Derivative Ratio) Rule posits that the ratio of derivatives of the speedup functions for all actively resourced jobs is held constant under an optimal policy. The General Water-Filling (GWF) method computes optimal allocations by solving for a parameter "water level" via the inverse derivatives, leading to allocation rules equipped to handle any general strictly concave, increasing, differentiable $s(\theta)$ (Li et al., 1 Sep 2025).

Second-order cone functions are another canonical example, arising in optimization, which are concave as a consequence of being an affine function minus a norm; their geometric and boundedness properties are governed by transformed quadratic forms and the relationships between the linear and curvature parameters (Jibrin et al., 2023).

In complex analysis, the mapping of the unit disk onto complements of convex domains via univalent functions (concave mappings) is characterized via the real part of $1 + zf''(z)/f'(z)$ and bounds involving the Schwarzian derivative, linking function theory to geometric constraints that are, in essence, implicit manifestations of concavity (Bravo et al., 2023).

---

Implicit concave functions epitomize the enrichment of classical concavity via variational, geometric, operator theoretic, probabilistic, and combinatorial mechanisms. Their unifying perspective fosters advances across analysis, optimization, probability, and discrete mathematics, simultaneously elucidating the structure of classical objects and enabling applications to contemporary problems in numerical analysis, signal processing, scheduling, statistical inference, and beyond.