Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
GPT-4o
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
o3 Pro
GPT-4.1 Pro
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
2000 character limit reached

RoPE Rolling: Multi-Contact Feasibility

Updated 30 July 2025
  • RoPE Rolling is a framework that determines when pure rolling can be maintained simultaneously at multiple contact points in mechanical systems.
  • It employs reduced order dynamics and parametric solutions to resolve underdetermined balance equations via frictional inequality constraints.
  • The method extends classic single-contact analysis to complex systems, as demonstrated in applications with disks, linked rods, and spheres in grooves.

RoPE Rolling denotes a rigorous framework for determining the feasibility—and, under suitable conditions, the sufficiency—of enforcing simultaneous pure rolling constraints at multiple contact points in mechanical systems subject to both holonomic and nonholonomic constraints. Rooted in the generalization of the classic single-contact rolling problem, the RoPE Rolling methodology systematically characterizes when multibody systems with multiple rolling contacts (e.g., connected wheels, spheres in grooves) can maintain pure rolling at all interfaces, given both dynamic equations of motion and frictional inequalities.

1. Formulation of the Multiple Rolling Problem

RoPE Rolling begins by stipulating that, at initial time t0t_0, every contact point TiT_i between the moving body and its environment must possess zero slip velocity relative to the supporting surface, i.e., vTi(t0)=0v_{T_i}(t_0) = 0 for all ii. This “no initial slip” condition is a precondition for the rolling assumption to hold dynamically.

Accepting the pure rolling assumption for all contacts, the system's effective degrees of freedom are reduced—each constraint (per contact) typically removes one or more geometrical freedoms depending on configuration. The evolution of the mechanical system thereafter is determined by the reduced order dynamics, which now encode the assumed rolling constraints at each contact.

2. Governing Equations: Linear and Angular Momentum

The reduced dynamics are expressed via the global balance of linear and angular momentum: Ract+Rreact=MaG\mathbf{R}^{\text{act}} + \mathbf{R}^{\text{react}} = M\mathbf{a}_G

MGact+MGreact=dΓGdt\mathbf{M}_G^{\text{act}} + \mathbf{M}_G^{\text{react}} = \frac{d\Gamma_G}{dt}

where MM is the system mass, aG\mathbf{a}_G the acceleration of the center of mass GG, while R\mathbf{R} and MG\mathbf{M}_G subsume both active (external) and reactive (contact) forces and moments. In systems with nn contact points, Rreact=i=1nΦTi\mathbf{R}^{\text{react}} = \sum_{i=1}^{n} \Phi_{T_i} and MGreact=i=1n(GTi×ΦTi)\mathbf{M}_G^{\text{react}} = \sum_{i=1}^{n} (\vec{GT_i} \times \Phi_{T_i}). Geometric and constraint derived relationships often render the linear algebraic system underdetermined, with the number of independent equations less than the total unknown reaction components.

3. Contact Reaction Forces: Parametric Solution and Decomposition

The underdetermined system admits a parametric solution: the reactions ΦTi\Phi_{T_i} at each contact are functions of both time and a set of free parameters {λ1,...,λr}\{\lambda_1, ..., \lambda_r\} capturing the indeterminacy induced by the insufficient equations. Explicit expressions are constructed by resolving the reaction vectors into components: ΦTi=ΦTi+ΦTi\Phi_{T_i} = \Phi_{T_i}^{\parallel} + \Phi_{T_i}^{\perp} where the parallel (tangential) and perpendicular (normal) directions are with respect to the local contact plane.

4. Frictional Constraints: Necessary Conditions via Inequality Systems

To ensure that pure rolling is dynamically consistent, the reaction forces at each point must obey the local friction law (e.g., Coulomb friction). For each TiT_i: ΦTi(t,λ1,...,λr)μiΦTi(t,λ1,...,λr)\|\Phi_{T_i}^{\parallel}(t, \lambda_1, ..., \lambda_r)\| \leq \mu_i \|\Phi_{T_i}^{\perp}(t, \lambda_1, ..., \lambda_r)\| where μi\mu_i is the coefficient of friction at the iith contact. This system of inequalities, written for all contacts over the time interval of interest, encodes the necessary conditions for simultaneity of pure rolling. The feasibility problem thus reduces to the existence, for all tt, of a set of parameters {λi}\{\lambda_i\} for which these inequalities are satisfied at each contact.

5. Sufficiency of the Frictional Solution

Building on classical results for single-contact rolling, the RoPE Rolling framework postulates that if, at every instant, at least one assignment of the free parameters {λ1,,λr}\{\lambda_1,\ldots,\lambda_r\} admits satisfaction of all frictional inequalities, then pure rolling is not only necessary but also sufficient for the evolution: the mechanical system maintains simultaneous rolling at all contacts throughout the interval, provided no detachment or other constraint violation arises.

6. Application to Prototypical Mechanical Systems

The RoPE Rolling methodology has been validated on several canonical systems:

Mechanical System Key Abstracted Equations/Conditions Comments
Disk on Inclined Plane μ13tanα\mu \geq \tfrac{1}{3} \tan \alpha Friction threshold recovers classical single-contact result
Two Disks Linked by Rod λμ1S1|\lambda| \leq \mu_1\, S_1, f(ω1,0,ω2,0,λ)μ2S2|f(\omega_{1,0}, \omega_{2,0}, \lambda)| \leq \mu_2\, S_2 Coupled inequalities admit parametric solution via λ\lambda
Sphere in V-Groove μ12/31\mu_1 \geq 2/\sqrt{31}, μ22/29\mu_2 \geq \sqrt{2/29} Parametric representation in special basis, frictional minima compute feasibility

In each example, explicit reduction to parametric forms and subsequent frictional feasibility analysis capture the essence of the methodology.

7. General Significance and Extensions

The generalization inherent in RoPE Rolling extends the pure rolling analysis from single-point/contact systems to arbitrarily complex multi-contact multibody arrangements on rough surfaces. The method encompasses not only the standard rigid-body disk or sphere, but also more general multibody assemblies with flexible parametrizations, provided a complete reduction of the degrees of freedom is possible under the assumed rolling constraints. The algorithmic sequence—initial slip check, assumption of pure rolling, balance equations, parametric solution, frictional inequality feasibility—makes the framework applicable to a variety of engineering and robotics problems involving cooperative or collective rolling contact phenomena.

The sufficiency result for simultaneous rolling under satisfaction of frictional inequalities, justified by analogs in simpler cases, streamlines design and analysis by reducing complex multibody rolling configurations to well-posed convex or parametric inequality systems.

8. Summary of Procedure

To assess the feasibility of pure (RoPE) rolling in a generic multibody system:

  1. Zero Initial Slipping: Ensure vTi(t0)=0v_{T_i}(t_0) = 0 for all contacts.
  2. Rolling Assumption: Use rolling constraints to reduce system DOFs.
  3. Balance Laws: Write linear and angular momentum equations.
  4. Parametric Solution: Solve the underdetermined algebraic system for reactions in terms of free parameters.
  5. Decomposition and Inequalities: At each contact, decompose reaction and enforce frictional inequality constraints.
  6. Feasibility Check: Verify the existence, for all tt, of admissible parameter sets satisfying all inequalities.
  7. Conclusion: If such sets exist throughout the relevant time interval, pure rolling is both necessary and (by the adopted criterion) sufficient.

This algorithmic sequence, as exemplified in applications to disks, linkages, and spheres in grooves, provides a consistent and rigorous basis for predicting and engineering multi-contact rolling systems. The RoPE Rolling method—grounded in first-principles mechanics and convex inequality analysis—thus serves as a foundational tool for both theoretical investigations and practical design in multibody dynamical systems (1106.2255).

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (1)