Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
2000 character limit reached

Pseudoscalar-Vector Interactions in QCD

Updated 6 December 2025
  • Pseudoscalar-vector interactions are couplings between 0⁻ and 1⁻ fields, underpinning scattering, weak/electromagnetic transitions, and effective chiral Lagrangians.
  • They are analyzed using chiral and heavy-quark symmetry methods alongside S-matrix and coupled-channel calculations to predict scattering lengths and potential resonant states.
  • These interactions also inform studies on semileptonic decays, exotic potentials in atomic spectroscopy, and deviations from traditional vector-meson dominance in anomalous processes.

Pseudoscalar-vector interactions encompass the full range of direct and induced couplings, scattering processes, weak and electromagnetic transitions, and hadronic structure phenomena involving fields of the form P(x)P(x) (pseudoscalar, JP=0J^P=0^-) and Vμ(x)V_\mu(x) (vector, JP=1J^P=1^-). These interactions are fundamental in effective field theories of QCD, in the phenomenology of heavy-flavor hadrons, atomic precision measurements probing new physics, and in the construction of chiral Lagrangians for low-energy hadron dynamics. Their detailed structure emerges from symmetry analysis (chiral, gauge, heavy-quark), explicit calculation of S-matrix elements, and matched (lattice, experimental) determination of low-energy constants and potential couplings.

1. Chiral and Heavy-Meson Effective Lagrangians for Pseudoscalar-Vector Scattering

The S-wave interaction of light pseudoscalar (π\pi, KK, η\eta) and heavy vector (DD^*, DsD_s^*) mesons is systematically organized in a combined chiral and heavy-quark expansion. The leading-order (LO) Lagrangian employs the Goldstone field ξ=exp(iϕ/2f)\xi = \exp(i\phi/2f) and the heavy meson doublet H=12(1+vγ)[Pμγμ+iPγ5]H = \frac{1}{2}(1+v\cdot\gamma)\left[P^*_\mu\gamma^\mu + i P\gamma_5\right]. To LO in small parameter ϵ=p/Λχ\epsilon=p/\Lambda_\chi: LHϕ(1)=(ivH)Hˉ+HvΓHˉ+gHuγ5Hˉ18δHσμνHˉσμν\mathcal{L}^{(1)}_{H\phi} = -\langle (iv \cdot \partial H)\bar H \rangle + \langle H v \cdot \Gamma \bar H \rangle + g \langle H u \cdot \gamma_5 \bar H \rangle - \tfrac{1}{8}\delta\langle H \sigma^{\mu\nu}\bar H \sigma_{\mu\nu}\rangle with specified axial coupling g0.59g \simeq 0.59, mass splitting parameter δ142\delta \simeq 142 MeV, and decay constants fπf_\pi, fKf_K, fηf_\eta (Liu et al., 2011).

Threshold scattering is formulated via a chiral expansion of the TT-matrix: T=T(1)+T(2)+T(3)+T = T^{(1)} + T^{(2)} + T^{(3)} + \ldots with LO TPV(I)LO=CImP/fP2T^{(I)}_{PV}|_{LO} = -C_I \cdot m_P/f_P^2 and NLO incorporating four LECs (c0,1,2,3c_{0,1,2,3}), followed by NNLO with loop contributions and further LECs κir\kappa_i^r.

Scattering lengths (in fm) for all independent PVP V channels are tabulated below (real parts, HMχ\chiPT scheme):

Channel (Isospin) aa [fm]
πD\pi D^* (3/2) 0.13(5)-0.13(5)
πD\pi D^* (1/2) +0.27(7)+0.27(7)
KDK D^* (0) +0.76(20)+0.76(20)
KˉD\bar K D^* (0) +0.29(10)+0.29(10)
ηD\eta D^* (1/2) +0.05(3)+0.09i+0.05(3)+0.09i

LO contributions dominate in πD\pi D^* channels (rapid convergence), but KDK D^* and ηD\eta D^* receive large mK,mηm_K, m_\eta loop corrections only partially canceled by tree-level NNLO terms. Attraction occurs in the I=1/2I=1/2 πD\pi D^*, I=0I=0 KDK D^*, and KˉD\bar K D^* channels, suggesting possible shallow bound or molecular states relevant for interpreting near-threshold XYZXYZ and DsJD_{sJ} structures (Liu et al., 2011).

2. Coupled-Channel Dynamics: Pseudoscalar-Vector Coupling to Baryons

In hadron spectroscopy, coupled-channel dynamical calculations involving both pseudoscalar-baryon (PB) and vector-baryon (VB) systems are central to understanding resonance generation. The effective Lagrangian framework employs:

  • PB interactions from the chiral Weinberg-Tomozawa Lagrangian.
  • VB interactions from hidden local symmetry, yielding Yukawa-type VBB vertices, vector-exchange in tt-, ss-, and uu-channels, and contact interactions derived from gauge invariance of the anomalous magnetic moment term.
  • PB–VB transitions by extending the Kroll–Ruderman theorem to vector emission.

These kernels are used in a coupled-channel Bethe-Salpeter equation: T(s)=[1V(s)G(s)]1V(s)T(s) = [1 - V(s) G(s)]^{-1} V(s) with V=V(P)+V(V)+V(PV)V=V^{(P)} + V^{(V)} + V^{(PV)} and G(s)G(s) the regulated two-particle loop. Pole analysis yields multi-channel 1/21/2^- and 3/23/2^- Λ\Lambda^*, Σ\Sigma^*, NN^*, and Δ\Delta resonances, with vector channels playing a crucial role in correct mass positioning, spin-structure splitting, and reproducing experimental cross-sections and widths. For example, the double-pole structure of N(1650)N^*(1650) and accurate description of Λ(1405)\Lambda(1405) and Λ(1670)\Lambda(1670) require substantive PB–VB mixing (Khemchandani et al., 2012, Khemchandani et al., 2013).

3. Weak and Electromagnetic Pseudoscalar-Vector Transitions

Semileptonic decays of heavy pseudoscalar mesons into vector mesons are described via the matrix element of the weak current decomposed as: V(p,ϵ)JμP(p)=i2V(q2)mP+mVϵμναβϵνpαpβ+(mP+mV)A1(q2)[ϵμϵqq2qμ]\langle V(p',\epsilon)|J_\mu|P(p)\rangle = -i \frac{2 V(q^2)}{m_P + m_V} \epsilon_{\mu\nu\alpha\beta} \epsilon^{*\nu} p'^\alpha p^\beta + (m_P + m_V) A_1(q^2)\left[\epsilon^*_\mu - \frac{\epsilon^*\cdot q}{q^2} q_\mu\right] -\ldots with vector and axial-vector form factors V,A1,2,0(q2)V,\,A_{1,2,0}(q^2) subject to heavy-quark symmetry constraints. Using the symmetry-preserving vector×\timesvector contact interaction (SCI), all 12 PVP \to V semileptonic channels (light-light, heavy-light, heavy-heavy) are calculated, reproducing measured form factors and branching ratios to \sim10–20% (Xing et al., 2022).

SCI results are consistent with heavy-quark symmetry: in the mQm_Q\to\infty limit, VV, A1A_1, A2A_2, A0A_0 collapse onto a single Isgur–Wise function ξ(w);w=(mP2+mV2q2)/(2mPmV)\xi(w);\, w=(m_P^2+m_V^2-q^2)/(2m_P m_V). SM lepton universality ratios R(D)R(D^*), R(J/ψ)R(J/\psi) also match experimental values within theory and measurement errors.

In the context of P–V–γ\gamma vertices and anomalous processes, the hidden-gauge Lagrangian gives (Molina1^1 et al., 2010): LVVP=G2ϵμναβμVναVβP\mathcal{L}_{VVP} = \frac{G'}{\sqrt{2}} \epsilon^{\mu\nu\alpha\beta} \langle \partial_\mu V_\nu \partial_\alpha V_\beta P \rangle This interaction mediates decays such as K2(1430)KγK_2^*(1430)\to K\gamma, where loop diagrams with VVP and VγV \leftrightarrow \gamma mixing yield amplitudes in excellent agreement with PDG values.

4. Exclusive Decays and Higher-Twist Effects in Quarkonium

Helicity-suppressed exclusive decays of 0+0^{-+} quarkonia to two vector mesons, ηQV1V2\eta_Q \to V_1 V_2, are naively forbidden at leading twist by helicity conservation. At next-to-leading order (NLO) in NRQCD, branching ratios are highly suppressed, e.g., Br(ηbJ/ψJ/ψ)107\mathrm{Br}(\eta_b\to J/\psi J/\psi) \approx 10^{-7} (Sun et al., 2010). However, light-cone higher-twist contributions, proportional to mVfVm_V f_V (twist-3) and mV2fVTm_V^2 f_V^T (twist-4), numerically overwhelm the NLO term and can increase Br\mathrm{Br} by an order of magnitude (106\sim10^{-6}).

For ηcVV\eta_c\to VV, even full twist-4 and NLO corrections undershoot experimental rates by 1–2 orders of magnitude, suggesting that non-perturbative rescattering or multiparticle effects are critical in these channels.

Channel Br (exp) Br (light-cone theory, twist-4)
ηcρρ\eta_c\to \rho\rho 2.0(7)×1022.0(7)\times 10^{-2} 2.0×1042.0\times 10^{-4}
ηcKK\eta_c\to K^*K^* 9.2(3.4)×1039.2(3.4)\times 10^{-3} 7.2×1047.2\times 10^{-4}

5. Exotic-Potential and Fundamental-Physics Aspects

Pseudoscalar and pseudovector exchange between fermions generates novel spin-dependent potentials probed by atomic and exotic-atom spectroscopy. The axial–axial (“pseudovector”) channel induces both Yukawa-type and 1/M21/M^2-enhanced contact terms: VAA(r)=g1Ag2A[V2(r)+(m1m2/M2)V3(r)]V_{AA}(r) = -g_1^A g_2^A [V_2(r) + (m_1 m_2 / M^2) V_3(r)] where V2(r)V_2(r) is a Yukawa potential and V3(r)V_3(r) encapsulates tensor and contact interactions. Notably, the V3V_3 term—arising from longitudinal polarizations—remains finite as M0M\to 0 in renormalizable (higgsed) models. Pseudoscalar exchange yields a purely contact spin-spin term.

These potentials shift hyperfine splittings in antiprotonic helium, muonium, positronium, helium, and hydrogen, setting constraints on gAgA/M2g^A g^A / M^2 and gpgpg^p g^p inaccessible to macroscopic force or accelerator-based experiments. For instance, in muonium spectroscopy,

geAgμ+A/M2<9.5×1023 eV2g_{e^-}^A g_{\mu^+}^A / M^2 < 9.5 \times 10^{-23}~\mathrm{eV}^{-2}

for MM \ll atomic scale (Fadeev et al., 2019).

6. Glueball and Nonperturbative QCD Pseudoscalar-Vector Interactions

The ground-state pseudoscalar glueball, G~\tilde G (JPC=0+J^{PC}=0^{-+}), couples chirally to vector and axial-vector mesons through

LGint=icG~Tr[Lμ(μΦΦ+ΦμΦ)Rμ(μΦΦ+ΦμΦ)]\mathcal{L}_{G-int} = i\,c\,\tilde G\,\operatorname{Tr}\left[ L_\mu (\partial^\mu \Phi \Phi^\dagger + \Phi \partial^\mu \Phi^\dagger) - R_\mu (\partial^\mu\Phi^\dagger \Phi + \Phi^\dagger \partial^\mu \Phi) \right]

Expansion yields the G–V–P coupling, with decay rates for G~VP\tilde G \to V P (e.g., KKK K^*) and three-body modes predicted as ratios to the main pseudoscalar decay (ππη\pi\pi\eta). The normalized branching ratio for KKK K^* at MG=2.6M_G=2.6 GeV is $0.00026$, indicating subleading but non-negligible vector content in glueball decays (Eshraim, 2020).

7. Modification of Vector Meson Dominance and Anomalous P–V–γ Couplings

Gauge-covariant diagonalization of the axial–pseudoscalar sector, as realized in the Nambu–Jona-Lasinio (NJL) model, induces direct photon–pion–quark couplings beyond conventional vector-meson dominance (VMD), leading to new P–V–γ structures. For most on-shell observables, these direct terms cancel against VMD modifications, but for anomalous processes (e.g., a1γππa_1\to\gamma\pi\pi, f1γππf_1\to\gamma\pi\pi) they generate genuinely observable deviations from pure VMD at the 10–20% level (Osipov et al., 2018). The full effective meson Lagrangian after manifestly gauge-invariant diagonalization includes: LπVγ(nonVMD)=ekm22GVTr[(Aμ[Q,p])Vμ]+\mathcal{L}_{\pi V\gamma}^{(\mathrm{non-VMD})} = e\,\frac{k\,m^2}{2\,G_V}\,\operatorname{Tr}\left[(A^\mu [Q,p]) V_\mu \right] + \ldots with new form-factor parameters not present in standard models.


References:

(Liu et al., 2011) S-wave pseudoscalar and heavy vector meson scattering lengths at third order (Molina1^1 et al., 2010) Anomalous VVP Lagrangian and K2(1430)KγK_2^*(1430)\to K\gamma (Khemchandani et al., 2012) Dynamical generation of Λ\Lambda, Σ\Sigma resonances via PB-VB coupling (Khemchandani et al., 2013) Pseudoscalar/vector channels in NN^*, Δ\Delta^* resonance formation (Sun et al., 2010) Exclusive decays ηQVV\eta_Q\to VV and higher-twist light-cone effects (Xing et al., 2022) Pseudoscalar\tovector semileptonic transitions in symmetry-preserving CI (Fadeev et al., 2019) Spin-dependent potentials from pseudovector/pseudoscalar exchange (Eshraim, 2020) Pseudoscalar glueball decays into vector channels (Osipov et al., 2018) Axial–pseudoscalar mixing, deviations from VMD, and P–V–γ\gamma couplings

Whiteboard

Follow Topic

Get notified by email when new papers are published related to Pseudoscalar-Vector Interactions.