Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
2000 character limit reached

Chirally Asymmetric Quark–Gluon Plasma

Updated 10 November 2025
  • Chirally asymmetric QGP is defined by unequal densities of right- and left-handed quarks, quantified by a nonzero axial chemical potential.
  • It exhibits anomaly-induced transport effects such as CME, CESE, and CVE, which are measurable in heavy-ion collisions and extreme QCD states.
  • Theoretical models combine hydrodynamics, lattice QCD, and field correlator methods to address experimental signatures and wave phenomena in QGP.

A chirally asymmetric quark–gluon plasma (QGP) is a deconfined phase of QCD where right- and left-handed quarks occur at unequal densities—a nonzero chiral chemical potential μ5=(μRμL)/2\mu_5 = (\mu_R - \mu_L)/2 quantifies this imbalance. In such a medium, fundamental quantum anomalies induce macroscopic transport effects that break parity locally and can be experimentally probed in relativistic heavy-ion collisions and other extreme environments. The following sections systematize the theoretical framework, experimental signatures, phase structure, radiative and collisional phenomena, and open questions in the study of chirally asymmetric QGP.

1. Quantum Anomaly, Axial Chemical Potential, and Hydrodynamic Realization

At the microscopic level, massless Dirac fermions subject to electromagnetic fields satisfy the anomaly relation

μJ5μ=CEB\partial_\mu J_5^\mu = -C\,\mathbf{E}\cdot\mathbf{B}

with anomaly coefficient C=e2/(2π2)C = e^2/(2\pi^2) (single Dirac fermion) or C=NcfQf2/(2π2)C = N_c\,\sum_f Q_f^2/(2\pi^2) in QCD (Shi et al., 2019). In thermal equilibrium, a chiral imbalance is encoded by a nonzero axial chemical potential, μ5\mu_5.

A hydrodynamic description extends conserved currents to include anomaly-induced non-dissipative terms: J5μ=n5uμ+ξ5Bμ+ξωωμ+J_5^\mu = n_5 u^\mu + \xi_5 B^\mu + \xi_\omega \omega^\mu + \ldots

Jμ=nuμ+ξBμ+J^\mu = n u^\mu + \xi B^\mu + \ldots

where uμu^\mu is the fluid four-velocity, Bμ=12εμνρσuνFρσB^\mu = \tfrac12 \varepsilon^{\mu\nu\rho\sigma} u_\nu F_{\rho\sigma} is the magnetic field in the fluid frame, and ωμ=εμνρσuνρuσ\omega^\mu = \varepsilon^{\mu\nu\rho\sigma} u_\nu \partial_\rho u_\sigma is the vorticity. The transport coefficients are fixed by anomaly matching (Shi et al., 2019, Becattini, 2018).

The two-component interpretation ("chiral superfluid") arises naturally when bosonizing low-lying Dirac modes with a finite cut-off, yielding a collective axion-like field θ(x)\theta(x) whose gradient dynamics encode chiral transport. The Josephson relation,

uμμθ+μ5=0,u^\mu\partial_\mu\theta + \mu_5 = 0,

connects fluid kinematics and the chiral sector (Kalaydzhyan, 2014, Kalaydzhyan, 2012).

2. Chiral Magnetic, Electric, and Vortical Effects

Chirally asymmetric QGP manifests by several anomaly-driven transport phenomena:

  • Chiral Magnetic Effect (CME):

An applied magnetic field induces a vector current:

J=σ5B,σ5=Cμ5=e2μ52π2\mathbf{J} = \sigma_5 \mathbf{B}, \quad \sigma_5 = C \mu_5 = \frac{e^2 \mu_5}{2\pi^2}

(Shi et al., 2019, Becattini, 2018)

  • Chiral Electric Separation Effect (CESE):

An external electric field eEe\mathbf{E} induces an axial current

JA=σχe(eE),σχeμμ5\mathbf{J}_A = \sigma_{\chi e} (e\mathbf{E}), \quad \sigma_{\chi e} \propto \mu \mu_5

with σχe=14.5163TTrf(QeQA)/(g4ln(1/g))×μμ5/T2\sigma_{\chi e} = 14.5163 \, T \, \mathrm{Tr}_f(Q_e Q_A)/(g^4 \ln(1/g)) \times \mu \mu_5/T^2 for u,du, d flavors (Jiang et al., 2014).

  • Chiral Vortical Effect (CVE):

Fluid vorticity induces a current with

Jμ=(μ2+μ52)4π2ωμJ^\mu = (\mu^2 + \mu_5^2) 4\pi^2 \omega^\mu

(Becattini, 2018, Jiang et al., 2015).

  • Chiral Dipole (Wave) Effect: Novel current terms arise in two-component models,

Jdipμ=Cemuμ(θB)=+Cemμ5(uB)uμJ_{\mathrm{dip}}^\mu = -C_{\mathrm{em}} u^\mu (\partial\theta \cdot B) = +C_{\mathrm{em}} \mu_5 (u\cdot B) u^\mu

corresponding to spatially modulated electric dipoles (Kalaydzhyan, 2014).

Table: Selected anomaly-induced conductivities in chirally asymmetric QGP

Effect Current Structure Conductivity formula
CME Jμ5BJ \propto \mu_5 B σ5=Cμ5=e2μ52π2\sigma_5 = C \mu_5 = \frac{e^2 \mu_5}{2\pi^2}
CESE JAμμ5EJ_A \propto \mu \mu_5 E σχe=(#)Tμμ5T2\sigma_{\chi e} = (\#) T \frac{\mu \mu_5}{T^2}
CVE J(μ2+μ52)ωJ \propto (\mu^2+\mu_5^2) \omega 4π2(μ2+μ52)4\pi^2 (\mu^2+\mu_5^2)

3. Collective Modes, Instabilities, and Phase Structure

The interplay of anomaly transport and hydrodynamics produces collective excitations:

  • Chiral Magnetic Wave (CMW): A coupled propagation of vector and axial charge densities in magnetic field, with dispersion

ω(k)=±vχkiDLk2,    vχ=NceB4π2μR,LjR,L0\omega(k) = \pm v_\chi k - i D_L k^2, \;\; v_\chi = \frac{N_c e B}{4\pi^2} \frac{\partial\mu_{R, L}}{\partial j^0_{R, L}}

(Burnier et al., 2011). The CMW induces an electric quadrupole moment in QGP, leading to splitting of charged pion elliptic flows v2(π+)<v2(π)v_2(\pi^+) < v_2(\pi^-), with relative difference Δv2rA±\Delta v_2 \sim r A_\pm and r0.04r \sim 0.04 at low-energy RHIC.

  • Chiral Vortical Wave (CVW): A gapless mode in rotating QGP with speed

VΩ=μ0ω2π2χμ0V_{\Omega} = \frac{\mu_0 \omega}{2\pi^2 \chi_{\mu_0}}

induces flavor charge quadrupoles and leads to small but characteristic splitting in Λ\Lambda elliptic flow (Jiang et al., 2015).

  • Chiral Plasma Instability: Berry-curvature kinetic theory predicts unstable plasma modes with exponential growth rate,

γ(k)=4αμ5π2mD2k2(1πkαμ5)\gamma(k) = \frac{4\alpha \mu_5}{\pi^2 m_D^2} k^2 \left(1-\frac{\pi k}{\alpha \mu_5}\right)

for 0<k<αμ5π0 < k < \frac{\alpha \mu_5}{\pi} (Akamatsu et al., 2013). In QCD, color-damping yields time scales τQCD1/(αs2μ5ln(1/αs))\tau_{\mathrm{QCD}} \sim 1/(\alpha_s^2 \mu_5 \ln(1/\alpha_s)).

Chiral-isospin chemical potentials (μI5\mu_{I5}) induce charged pion condensation (PC) at finite baryon density and temperature, with a duality symmetry between chiral symmetry breaking and PC. The phase diagrams exhibit a persistent PCn_n domain for ν5>0\nu_5 > 0 up to temperatures T0.20.35mT \sim 0.2-0.35\,m (60\sim 60--$100$ MeV) (Khunjua et al., 2019).

4. Nonperturbative Suppression and Experimental Strategies

The nonperturbative QCD interactions strongly modulate anomaly transport. Field Correlator Method (FCM) analysis reveals that

  • At high temperature TTcT \gg T_c (e.g., LHC/top RHIC), chromomagnetic confinement screens the CME conductivity, S(T,μB)0S(T, \mu_B) \to 0
  • Only in a narrow strip T11.2TcT \sim 1-1.2\,T_c ($160$--$200$ MeV) and rather large baryon chemical potential μB600\mu_B \gtrsim 600 MeV does the CME remain unsuppressed, S(T,μB)1S(T, \mu_B) \to 1
  • At low T<TcT < T_c, remnants of confinement also suppress anomaly transport (Abramchuk, 24 Mar 2025)

This suggests that QGP formed at elevated μB\mu_B and moderate TT—as in RHIC-BES, SPS, FAIR, NICA, J-PARC-HI—is optimal for CME studies, whereas collider energies producing high TT and low μB\mu_B are not.

To isolate CME signal from vorticity- and flow-driven backgrounds, isobar-subtraction strategy (Ru+Ru vs. Zr+Zr) is employed: by matching charged multiplicity and elliptic flow (NchN_{\mathrm{ch}}, v2v_2) and exploiting a controlled difference in magnetic field (BRu10B_{\mathrm{Ru}} \sim 1025%25\% larger), the difference ΔγRuΔγZr\Delta \gamma_{Ru} - \Delta \gamma_{Zr} and the ratio ζisobarEP=[ΔγRuΔγZr]/[ΔδRuΔδZr]0.41±0.27\zeta^{EP}_{\mathrm{isobar}} = [\Delta\gamma_{Ru} - \Delta\gamma_{Zr}]/[\Delta\delta_{Ru} - \Delta\delta_{Zr}] \simeq -0.41 \pm 0.27 (EP) and 0.90±0.45-0.90 \pm 0.45 (RP) provide robust CME observables independent of μ5\mu_5 uncertainty (Shi et al., 2019).

5. Radiation and Energy Loss: Chiral Cherenkov and Anomaly-Modified Bremsstrahlung

Chirally asymmetric QGP hosts emergent axion-like modes θ(x)\theta(x) from sphaleron-induced topological charge fluctuations. These couple anomalously to photons and gluons (axion electrodynamics/chromodynamics), changing their dispersion relations: ω2=k2λσχk\omega^2 = k^2 - \lambda \sigma_\chi |k| where λ\lambda is the circular polarization and σχCAμ5\sigma_\chi \sim C_A \mu_5 (Hansen et al., 24 Sep 2024).

Key consequences:

  • Chiral Cherenkov radiation: Free charged particles radiate even in vacuum (ε=1\varepsilon=1) if σχ0\sigma_\chi \neq 0. The quantum energy loss per unit length is

dEdz=13αq2σχ\frac{dE}{dz} = \frac{1}{3} \alpha q^2 \sigma_\chi

and color Cherenkov losses scale as dEqqg/dzαsg2b0EdE_{q \to qg}/dz \sim \alpha_s g^2 b_0 E (Hansen et al., 24 Sep 2024).

  • Anomaly-modified bremsstrahlung: Scattering cross sections and energy loss become helicity dependent, with parametric corrections σχE/m2\sim \sigma_\chi E / m^2 or σχE/μ2\sigma_\chi E / \mu^2 to standard Bethe–Heitler losses.
  • Experimental relevance: The angular and polarization structure of emitted photons and gluons, and jet energy loss asymmetries, encode the presence of μ50\mu_5 \neq 0, allowing direct access to QCD topological fluctuations.

6. Anisotropy, Mass Effects, and Lattice/QCD Model Evidence

Anisotropic QGP, as realized via holographic AdS backgrounds with nonzero spatial anisotropy parameter aa, modifies the CME response for massive quarks. At fixed temperature, increasing aa enhances the magnitude of CME for quarks of finite mass (while remaining unchanged for massless quarks) (Ali-Akbari et al., 2014). The functional dependence is J(a)/J(a=0)1+c1(a/T)+\langle J(a)/J(a=0) \rangle \simeq 1 + c_1 (a/T) + \cdots for m0m \neq 0, with extension of the CME window to larger mass thresholds as anisotropy grows.

Lattice studies in the window Tc<T<2TcT_c < T < 2 T_c show spectral gaps between “near-zero” Dirac eigenmodes and the bulk, with low-lying coherent modes forming the chiral superfluid component and the gapped sector giving rise to standard thermalized QGP ("normal fluid") (Kalaydzhyan, 2014, Kalaydzhyan, 2012). The bosonization of IR modes yields the axion field θ(x)\theta(x), embedding all anomaly structures in the low-energy effective action.

7. Limitations, Open Problems, and Future Directions

Current theoretical constraints include:

  • FCM and HTL approximations: Validity limited to certain regions of phase diagram; extrapolation into T(13)TcT \sim (1-3) T_c and strong-coupling regimes requires nonperturbative tools (Abramchuk, 24 Mar 2025, Jiang et al., 2014).
  • Back-reaction and time-dependence of μ5\mu_5 and emergent axion domains: Their rapid evolution and spatial structure are not fully resolved in current hydrodynamic implementations.
  • Quantitative modeling of experimental observables: Requires dynamic integration of anomaly transport coefficients, initial μ5\mu_5 fluctuations, electromagnetic field evolution, and subleading backgrounds.
  • Phenomenology of pion-condensed domains at high TT and μI50\mu_{I5} \neq 0 calls for further studies in full (3+1)-dimensional QCD-based models, lattice simulations, and astrophysical settings (Khunjua et al., 2019).

A plausible implication is that, as experimental programs expand into lower collision energies and higher baryon densities, the prospect for direct observation of genuine chirally asymmetric QGP and robust confirmation of anomaly-induced transport increases. Future directions include refining initial condition models, implementing full spin hydrodynamics, and extending searches to differentiated species, differential rapidities, and other collision systems (Shi et al., 2019, Becattini, 2018).


The synthesis above integrates the full anomaly-driven phenomenology, transport theory, collective-mode dynamics, phase structure, and experimental methodologies required for study of a chirally asymmetric quark–gluon plasma.

Whiteboard

Follow Topic

Get notified by email when new papers are published related to Chirally Asymmetric Quark Gluon Plasma.