Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
2000 character limit reached

Polymatroids on Stallings Core Graphs

Updated 7 January 2026
  • The paper introduces a polymatroid framework on Stallings core graphs to encode structural, algebraic, and probabilistic invariants of free group subgroups.
  • It unifies classical bounds such as the strengthened Hanna Neumann inequality and Wise’s cyclic bound by associating submodular rank functions to graph data.
  • The methods yield new lower bounds on stable invariants and probabilistic upper limits on subgroup mappings via random homomorphisms, bridging group theory and combinatorial optimization.

Polymatroids on Stallings core graphs provide a functional and combinatorial framework for encoding and analyzing structural, algebraic, and probabilistic invariants of subgroups of free groups. This theory reformulates and unifies a variety of classical and recent group-theoretic bounds, especially those related to the Hanna Neumann Conjecture and its generalizations, by associating submodular rank functions—polymatroids—to graph-theoretic, homological, and action-theoretic data on Stallings core graphs. The resulting methods yield new lower bounds on stable invariants for subgroups, and new upper bounds on the probability that words or subgroups map to prescribed subgroups under random homomorphisms into finite groups, bridging group theory, random mapping, invariant theory, and combinatorial optimization (Shomroni, 31 Dec 2025).

1. Stallings Core Graphs and Their Structure

Let F=Free(B)F = \mathrm{Free}(B) denote the free group on a finite generating set BB. For every finitely generated subgroup HFH \leq F, the associated Stallings core graph ΓH\Gamma_H is constructed as a finite, BB-labeled covering of the bouquet ΩB\Omega_B—the wedge of B|B| loops labeled by BB—with all “hanging trees” and isolated tree components pruned away. The immersion

ι:ΓHΩB\iota: \Gamma_H \longrightarrow \Omega_B

is uniquely specified by the subgroup HH. Vertices V(ΓH)V(\Gamma_H) correspond to cosets HgFHg \subset F accessible by closed loops, and for each bBb \in B there is a set Eb(ΓH)E_b(\Gamma_H) of directed bb-edges, each with specified source s(e)s(e) and target t(e)t(e) in V(ΓH)V(\Gamma_H). The core property ensures that, except possibly at a chosen basepoint, no vertex is a leaf.

2. Definition and Properties of Polymatroids on Core Graphs

Given a (possibly disconnected) finite BB-labeled core graph Γ\Gamma, one defines a Γ\Gamma-polymatroid as a system of set functions

hV:2V(Γ)N,hb:2Eb(Γ)N,(bB)h^V: 2^{V(\Gamma)} \to \mathbb{N}, \qquad h^b: 2^{E_b(\Gamma)} \to \mathbb{N}, \quad (b \in B)

subject to the following axioms for all XYX \subseteq Y:

  • Monotonicity: h(X)h(Y)h^*(X) \leq h^*(Y),
  • Submodularity: h(X)+h(Y)h(XY)+h(XY)h^*(X) + h^*(Y) \geq h^*(X \cup Y) + h^*(X \cap Y).

Moreover, the structure map between edge sets and vertex sets via source and target must preserve or dominate rank differences: hb(Y)hb(X)hV(s(Y))hV(s(X))h^b(Y) - h^b(X) \geq h^V(s(Y)) - h^V(s(X)) for all XYEbX \subseteq Y \subseteq E_b, and similarly for tt. When equality holds, the polymatroid is called lossless.

This abstract formalism allows the encoding of various geometric or algebraic quantities, such as vertex sets, edge sets, covering numbers, or invariants of lifts, into a unified structure.

3. The Main Γ–Polymatroid Theorem and its Consequences

The key structural result is the Γ–polymatroid theorem. For any connected BB-core graph Γ\Gamma with fundamental group H=π1(Γ)H = \pi_1(\Gamma) and Γ\Gamma-polymatroid hh, assume

  • rank(H)>1\mathrm{rank}(H) > 1; or
  • HH is cyclic, H=wH = \langle w\rangle with ww a non-power word, and hh is compact (no ground element is a co-loop).

Then there exists bBb \in B and eEb(Γ)e \in E_b(\Gamma) so that

χ(h)=hV(V(Γ))bBhb(Eb(Γ))hb({e})\chi(h) = h^V(V(\Gamma)) - \sum_{b \in B} h^b(E_b(\Gamma)) \leq -h^b(\{e\})

In particular, if hb({e})>0h^b(\{e\}) > 0 for all ee, then χ(h)<0\chi(h) < 0.

Implications:

  • For the Euler–characteristic polymatroid, this yields the Friedman–Mineyev lower bound in the strengthened Hanna Neumann inequality.
  • For hh encoding covering counts (preimages in coverings), this reproduces Wise’s rank-1 (cyclic) bound for non-power words.
  • For hh measuring stable primitivity rank, the theorem formalizes the Gap Theorem: sπ(H)1s\pi(H) \geq 1 for non-abelian HH, and sπ(w)1s\pi(w) \geq 1 for a cyclic H=wH = \langle w\rangle.

4. Probabilistic Applications: Random Homomorphisms and Invariant Sets

Let α:FG\alpha: F \to G be a uniformly random homomorphism and GG act on a finite set XX. Constructing polymatroids on the solution set of systems α(b).f(s(e))=f(t(e))\alpha(b).f(s(e)) = f(t(e)), one obtains powerful upper bounds on the probability of prescribed invariant configurations.

The Reiter–Chen–Yeung type bound states: for HH as above, and any locally recoverable labeling f:V(ΓH)Xf: V(\Gamma_H) \to X,

$|\mathcal O| \cdot \Pr_{\alpha}\bigl(\mathcal O\mbox{ is valid}\bigr) \leq \frac{1}{|X|}$

for any orbit O\mathcal O of XV(ΓH)X^{V(\Gamma_H)}. In particular, the expected number of invariant points under α(H)\alpha(H) is O(X1)O(|X|^{-1}).

Specializing, for symmetric groups SnS_n, let SnH(d)S_n^H(d) denote the expected number of dd-element subsets of [n][n] fixed by α(H)\alpha(H). Then for fixed dd,

SnH(d)=Θ ⁣((nd)sd(H))S_n^H(d) = \Theta\!\left(\binom{n}{d}^{-s_d(H)}\right)

as nn \to \infty, with sd(H)s_d(H) the dd–stable compressed rank of HH. A similar formula holds for the Grassmannian action of GLn(Fq)\mathrm{GL}_n(\mathbb{F}_q).

Problem Bound via Polymatroid Stable Invariant
HK\lvert H \cap K \rvert Strengthened HN bound Euler–characteristic
Random fixed points O(X1)O(|X|^{-1}) Compressed rank sd(H)s_d(H)
Cover-lifts Wise–type bound Counting polymatroid

5. Worked Example: Polymatroids for a “Theta” Graph

Consider F=x,yF = \langle x, y\rangle and H=xyx,yx2H = \langle x y x, y x^2\rangle. The Stallings core ΓH\Gamma_H is a theta-shaped graph with two loops and one extra edge.

  • The trivial polymatroid: hV(U)=Uh^V(U) = |U|, hb(Eb)=Ebh^b(E_b') = |E_b'| for all UV,EbEbU \subseteq V, E_b' \subseteq E_b.
    • For each edge ee, χ(h)=VE=1\chi(h) = |V| - |E| = -1 and hb({e})=1h^b(\{e\}) = 1, which makes χ(h)1\chi(h) \leq -1 sharp by the theorem.
  • The random-cover counting polymatroid: hV(U)h^V(U) and hb(Eb)h^b(E_b') defined as the logarithms of the number of partial lifts over UU or EbE_b', respectively.
    • This formulation yields Wise’s bound on the number of lifts, replacing simple cardinality counts by geometric or probabilistic enumeration.

6. Open Questions and Conjectures

Several conjectures and open questions are posed based on the structure afforded by the polymatroid formalism:

  • KK–Hanna–Neumann conjecture: For any subfield KK and algebraic f.g. right-submodule MK[F]dM \le K[F]^d not contained in a free summand,

    rankK(MK[H]d)d(rankK(M)d)(rank(H)1)\operatorname{rank}_K\left(M \cap K[H]^d\right) - d \leq (\operatorname{rank}_K(M) - d)\cdot(\operatorname{rank}(H) - 1)

  • Stability of primitivity ranks: Proposed equalities sπ(H)=π(H)1s\pi(H) = \pi(H) - 1 and sπˉ(H)=πˉ(H)1s\bar\pi(H) = \bar\pi(H) - 1 suggest alignment between “stable” and one–step invariants.
  • Integer-valued stable compressed ranks: Whether sd(H)Zs_d(H) \in \mathbb{Z} for all dd, and whether sd(H)s_d(H) genuinely depends on dd, remain unresolved. A conjecture posits sd(H)=πˉ(H)1s_d(H) = \bar\pi(H) - 1 for all dd.

A plausible implication is that the minimal complexity of dd-covers is governed by the compressed-rank lattice, indicating a deep underlying discrete structure in subgroup actions and coverings.

7. Synthesis and Unified Perspective

Polymatroids on Stallings core graphs subsume previously distinct threads: group-theoretic intersection inequalities, probabilistic behavior of group actions, enumerative invariants of coverings, and module-theoretic bounds. By encoding covering counts, fixed point decay, and linear-algebraic dependencies into polymatroid rank functions, a single framework yields gap theorems for group invariants and precise decay rates for the measure of invariant configurations under random mappings or actions. This flexible approach facilitates both the verification of classical results—such as the strengthened Hanna Neumann and Wise’s cyclic inequalities—and the formulation of new probabilistic, algebraic, and stability conjectures for subgroups and their actions (Shomroni, 31 Dec 2025).

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (1)

Whiteboard

Topic to Video (Beta)

Follow Topic

Get notified by email when new papers are published related to Polymatroids on Stallings Core Graphs.