Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Assistant
AI Research Assistant
Well-researched responses based on relevant abstracts and paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 171 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 47 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 32 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 36 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 60 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 188 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 437 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.5 36 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

ℤₚᵐ-Action of Type (d;p,n) in Complex Geometry

Updated 13 November 2025
  • The topic defines ℤₚᵐ-actions of type (d;p,n) as structures where a finite abelian group acts faithfully on a compact complex manifold, producing a Galois orbifold cover of ℙᵈ with a branched hyperplane arrangement.
  • It employs generalized Fermat varieties and specific numerical conditions (2 ≤ d ≤ m ≤ n) to construct these covers, ensuring the branch locus is composed of n+1 hyperplanes with branching order p.
  • Key results include the normality of the acting group in Aut(S), the uniqueness of the cover construction, and the demonstration of non-hyperbolicity when n ≤ 2d–1, supported by explicit examples.

A Zpm{\mathbb Z}_{p}^{m}-action of type (d;p,n)(d;p,n), where 2dmn2 \leq d \leq m \leq n are integers and p2p \geq 2, is a structure in complex geometry consisting of a pair (S,N)(S,N). Here, SS is a compact dd-dimensional complex manifold, and NZpmN \cong {\mathbb Z}_p^m is a group of holomorphic automorphisms of SS such that NN acts faithfully and properly discontinuously. The quotient orbifold S/NS/N is isomorphic to the complex projective space Pd{\mathbb P}^d, with a branch locus given by n+1n+1 hyperplanes in general position, each with branch order pp. This construction generalizes the classical theory of abelian Galois covers and brings together perspectives from group actions, branched coverings, and the theory of orbifolds.

1. Precise Definition and Orbifold Structure

Let p2p \ge 2 and 2dmn2 \le d \le m \le n. A Zpm{\mathbb Z}_{p}^{m}-action of type (d;p,n)(d;p,n) is defined by the following data:

  • SS, a compact complex manifold of complex dimension dd,
  • NZpmN \cong {\mathbb Z}_p^m, a subgroup of the holomorphic automorphism group Aut(S)\operatorname{Aut}(S), acting faithfully and properly discontinuously.

The action is specified so that the quotient orbifold πN:SS/N=Pd\pi_N: S \to S/N = {\mathbb P}^d is a Galois cover with deck group NN. The branch locus is the union B=Σ1Σn+1\mathcal{B} = \Sigma_1 \cup \cdots \cup \Sigma_{n+1}, where each Σj\Sigma_j is a hyperplane in general position, and the local branching order along each Σj\Sigma_j is pp.

Equivalently, the orbifold pair can be written as (Pd,Δ)({\mathbb P}^d, \Delta), where

Δ=p1pj=1n+1Σj\Delta = \frac{p-1}{p} \sum_{j=1}^{n+1} \Sigma_j

so the orbifold fundamental group has the presentation

π1orb(Pd,Δ)=γ1,,γn+1  γjp=1, γ1γn+1=1\pi_{1}^{\mathrm{orb}}({\mathbb P}^d, \Delta) = \langle \gamma_1,\ldots,\gamma_{n+1} ~|~ \gamma_j^p = 1,~ \gamma_1\cdots\gamma_{n+1}=1 \rangle

The manifold SS is the Zpm{\mathbb Z}_p^m-cover corresponding to this group via deck transformations.

2. Numerical Constraints and Geometric Interpretation

For such a structure to exist, several numerical inequalities must be satisfied:

  • 2dmn2 \le d \le m \le n, ndn \ge d.
  • Branching along n+1n+1 hyperplanes in Pd{\mathbb P}^d imposes ndn \ge d due to the general-position requirement.

Each hyperplane contributes a Zp\mathbb{Z}_p-generator in the maximal abelian cover, so mnm \le n.

Borderline and illustrative cases include:

  • If n=dn = d, then SPdS \cong {\mathbb P}^d and m=dm = d: the cover is trivial,
  • If n=d+1n = d+1, then SS is the Fermat hypersurface of degree pp in Pd+1{\mathbb P}^{d+1},

X={x1p++xd+2p=0}X = \{x_1^p + \cdots + x_{d+2}^p = 0\}

with deck group HZpd+1H \cong {\mathbb Z}_p^{d+1}.

Generally, for nd+1n \ge d + 1, nontrivial actions and covers arise. This formalism unifies a variety of classical and new constructions in the topology of complex manifolds.

3. Fundamental Theorems: Normality, Uniqueness, and Hyperbolicity

Assuming d2d \geq 2, d+1nd+1 \leq n, and excluding the special surface cases (d,p,n)=(2,2,5)(d,p,n) = (2,2,5) or (2,4,3)(2,4,3), the following hold:

A. Normality of NN in Aut(S)\operatorname{Aut}(S): Aut(S)\operatorname{Aut}(S) is finite, and NN is normal (NAut(S)N \triangleleft \operatorname{Aut}(S)). Every holomorphic automorphism of SS normalizes NN.

B. Uniqueness: If (S,M)(S, M) is any other Zp^m^{\mathbb Z}_{\hat{p}}^{\hat{m}}-action of type (d;p^,n^)(d;\hat{p},\hat{n}) on the same SS, so that S/MPdS/M \cong {\mathbb P}^d has n+1n+1 hyperplanes of order p^\hat p, then necessarily p^=p\hat p = p, m^=m\hat m = m, n^=n\hat n = n, and M=NM = N.

C. (Non-)Hyperbolicity: If d+1n2d1d+1 \leq n \leq 2d-1, then SS is not algebraically hyperbolic: SS admits a rational curve, specifically, a genus $0$ cover of a line in Pd{\mathbb P}^d.

This places severe rigidity constraints on possible group actions and the geometric type of the resulting manifolds.

4. Construction via Generalized Fermat Varieties

Realization of these actions proceeds through quotients of generalized Fermat varieties. Let X:=Xnp(Λ)PnX := X^p_n(\Lambda) \subset {\mathbb P}^n be the complete intersection defined by

{x1p++xd+1p+xd+2p=0 λ1,1x1p++λ1,dxdp+xd+1p+xd+3p=0 \begin{cases} x_1^p + \cdots + x_{d+1}^p + x_{d+2}^p = 0 \ \lambda_{1,1} x_1^p + \cdots + \lambda_{1,d} x_d^p + x_{d+1}^p + x_{d+3}^p = 0 \ \vdots \end{cases}

with deck group HZpnH \cong {\mathbb Z}_p^n acting linearly. There exists a subgroup KZpnmK \cong {\mathbb Z}_p^{n-m} acting freely, such that SX/KS \cong X/K and N=H/KZpmN = H/K \cong \mathbb{Z}_p^m.

Since XX is simply connected for d2d \geq 2, every automorphism of SS lifts to an automorphism of XX normalizing KK. The uniqueness theorem for generalized Fermat groups implies HH is the only Zpn{\mathbb Z}_p^n-subgroup in Aut(X)\operatorname{Aut}(X), so NN is normal in the finite group Aut(S)\operatorname{Aut}(S).

For the uniqueness property: any other appropriate Zpr{\mathbb Z}_p^r subgroup in Aut(S)\operatorname{Aut}(S) must correspond to a subgroup of HH, and by analysis of the fixed loci (each fixed by codimension-$1$ subgroups), one obtains M=H/K=NM = H/K = N.

The non-hyperbolicity result is demonstrated by explicit construction: for n2d1n \leq 2d-1, one can find lines in the branch locus whose preimages in SS yield rational (or low genus) curves.

5. Explicit Examples

Example 1: Fermat Hypersurface Quotient

Let X={x1p++xd+2p=0}Pd+1X = \{x_1^p + \cdots + x_{d+2}^p = 0\} \subset {\mathbb P}^{d+1} and H=φj:xjωpxjZpd+1H = \langle \varphi_j: x_j \mapsto \omega_p x_j \rangle \cong {\mathbb Z}_p^{d+1}. If pd+2p \geq d+2, the subgroup K=φ1φ21,,φd+1φd+21ZpK = \langle \varphi_1 \varphi_2^{-1}, \ldots, \varphi_{d+1} \varphi_{d+2}^{-1} \rangle \cong \mathbb{Z}_p acts freely, and the quotient S=X/KS = X/K admits N=H/KZpdN = H/K \cong \mathbb{Z}_p^d, yielding a Zpd{\mathbb Z}_p^d-action of type (d;p,d+1)(d;p,d+1).

Example 2: Case (d;p,n)=(2;2,6), m=3(d;p,n) = (2;2,6),~m=3

For the generalized Fermat surface X=X62(Λ)P6X = X_6^2(\Lambda) \subset \mathbb{P}^6, the subgroup K=φ1φ2φ4,φ1φ3φ5,φ2φ3φ6Z23K = \langle \varphi_1\varphi_2\varphi_4,\, \varphi_1\varphi_3\varphi_5,\, \varphi_2\varphi_3\varphi_6\rangle \cong \mathbb{Z}_2^3 acts freely, and S=X/KS = X/K, N=H/KZ23N = H/K \cong \mathbb{Z}_2^3 gives a Z23{\mathbb Z}_2^3-action of type (2;2,6)(2;2,6). This construction leads to a six-parameter family of surfaces with the specified symmetry and covering properties.

6. Context and Connections to Broader Theory

This class of actions generalizes a variety of classical constructions: for dimension d=1d=1, the situation corresponds to abelian covers of the Riemann sphere branched at several points, aligning with the rich theory of (Zp)m(\mathbb{Z}_p)^m actions on Riemann surfaces as in quadrangular actions (Hidalgo, 2021). The case d=2d=2 includes generalized Fermat surfaces, which have been the focus of deep paper due to their automorphism groups and moduli.

The rigidity, normality, and uniqueness results yield a strong classification in terms of orbifold data. The theory interconnects with the paper of the field of moduli and the structure of the Jacobian, although, for d>1d > 1, the Jacobian decompositions analogous to the d=1d=1 case do not extend directly.

A further implication is the geometric non-hyperbolicity for n2d1n\leq 2d-1, which situates these manifolds outside the landscape of algebraically hyperbolic varieties. This result constrains potential applications in the context of higher-dimensional hyperbolicity, emphasizing the abundance of rational curves in these covers for lower nn.

7. Future Directions and Open Problems

The data suggest several plausible research directions: classifications for exceptional parameter values (such as (2;2,5)(2;2,5) and (2;4,3)(2;4,3)), further exploration of higher symmetry loci (where the automorphism group is larger than NN), and extending detailed analysis to cases with ndn \gg d. Questions regarding moduli, arithmetic properties, and connections to broader phenomena such as rigidity in algebraic and differential geometry remain open.

The explicit geometry of these covers, especially for small pp, dd, and nn, continues to yield new families of complex manifolds with prescribed group actions and quotient orbifolds. The interplay of group theory, algebraic geometry, and orbifold fundamental groups characteristic of Zpm{\mathbb Z}_p^m-actions of type (d;p,n)(d;p,n) presents a framework for understanding higher-dimensional, highly symmetric manifolds with controlled branching loci.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (1)
Forward Email Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow Topic

Get notified by email when new papers are published related to ${\mathbb Z}_{p}^{m}$-action of type $(d;p,n)$.