PointNN Selector: Nearest-Neighbor Condensation
- PointNN Selector is an algorithm that selects a sparse set of labeled points ensuring perfect nearest-neighbor classification using a separation constraint.
- It modifies the classic FCNN heuristic by incorporating a user-defined separation parameter δ to control density and prevent over-representation in training sets.
- The method provides a constant-factor approximation to the minimum consistent subset, with theoretical guarantees based on doubling dimension and nearest-enemy complexity.
A PointNN Selector is a selection algorithm for identifying representative or relevant points from a dataset embedded in a metric space, with formal guarantees on both accuracy and subset size. It is most prominently defined in the context of nearest-neighbor condensation, where the goal is to minimize the subset of labeled points required for perfect classification under the nearest neighbor rule. The term encompasses a specific algorithmic modification of the classic Fast Condensed Nearest Neighbor (FCNN) heuristic, introducing separation constraints to prevent pathological clusterings and to obtain size and approximation guarantees (Flores-Velazco, 2020). The PointNN Selector framework is distinguished by its theoretical foundation, making it applicable as a robust solution for subset selection tasks in geometric and learning contexts.
1. Problem Definition and Formalism
The PointNN Selector algorithm addresses the minimum consistent subset (Min-CS) problem for nearest-neighbor classification in metric spaces . Given a labeled dataset with class labels , and the nearest neighbor function , the aim is to find a subset such that every is classified correctly, i.e., . The size of should be as small as possible, ideally approaching the minimum required for perfect consistency.
Key notations and structural parameters central to the problem include:
- Margin : The smallest distance between a point and its nearest enemy,
where .
- Nearest-enemy complexity : The number of distinct nearest-enemy points in .
- Doubling dimension : The smallest integer such that every ball of radius can be covered by balls of radius .
- Diameter , assumed normalized to 1.
2. Classic FCNN and Its Limitations
The original FCNN heuristic (Angiulli 2007) builds the subset iteratively:
- Initialize with the centroid of each class.
- For each , find misclassified points in for which is the nearest representative.
- Add the closest such misclassified point to .
- Repeat until no misclassifications remain.
While this approach preserves nearest-neighbor accuracy, its output size can become pathological (arbitrarily large in ), especially when points are densely packed near class boundaries (Flores-Velazco, 2020).
3. PointNN Selector: Algorithmic Description
The PointNN Selector is a modification of FCNN, introducing a user-specified separation parameter , usually set to the empirical margin . The algorithm is as follows:
- centroids of all classes.
- For each , enqueue any with and .
- While the queue is not empty:
- Dequeue .
- If for all , add to .
- For the new , enqueue any additional misclassified points for which is now the closest.
The algorithm ensures is always -separated; no two selected points are closer than . This enforces a packing constraint, preventing arbitrarily high local density in (Flores-Velazco, 2020).
4. Theoretical Guarantees
The PointNN Selector is the first variant in this family to provide provable worst-case size bounds and approximation guarantees for the Min-CS problem:
- Packing Bound: In a metric space of doubling dimension and diameter 1, the size of is
- Approximation Guarantee: Compared to the minimum-size consistent subset OPT, the PointNN Selector produces a -approximation:
- These results are obtained by partitioning by nearest-enemy and distance scale, showing that within each, packing numbers in doubling spaces limit cardinality.
If , the algorithm always achieves exact consistency (zero error) for the training set. If , a small number of boundary misclassifications may occur.
5. Parameter Selection and Practical Considerations
- Separation Parameter : In practice, set to the empirical margin to guarantee consistency and optimal separation.
- Algorithmic Complexity: Each insertion spends time checking the separation constraint; total runtime is , matching FCNN asymptotically.
- Queue Mechanics: The FIFO structure ensures that additions are well-ordered, and that density control is maintained throughout progress.
A typical application involves running PointNN Selector on a dataset to produce a sparse, robust, and representative set of exemplars, with size and approximation guarantees, to accelerate nearest-neighbor queries or to serve as condensed training sets for resource-constrained deployments.
6. Comparison with FCNN and Related Approaches
| FCNN | PointNN Selector | |
|---|---|---|
| Size bound | None (unbounded) | |
| Approximation to Min-CS | Heuristic only | factor |
| Runtime | ||
| Consistency on | Always if full | Always if |
FCNN demonstrates no non-trivial worst-case size bound, while PointNN Selector achieves a provable packing bound and constant-factor approximation for the NP-hard Min-CS problem. Both share similar asymptotic runtimes.
7. Interpretive Notes and Implications
The introduction of a separation constraint enables PointNN Selector to be robust to pathological input configurations and prevents over-representation of localized high-density regions. This suggests the method is suited to high-dimensional, potentially low-margin datasets where classic condensation algorithms fail by redundancy or overselection.
A plausible implication is that PointNN Selector is broadly applicable as a core method for prototype selection in metric learning, geometric data condensation, and for accelerating the inference speed of nearest-neighbor-based classifiers, while maintaining formal error and size guarantees. Its parameters expose an explicit trade-off between sparsity and fidelity, controlled via the separation . The algorithm’s performance is determined by the underlying geometry (doubling dimension) and the labeling complexity (through ).
References: The main definition, results, and algorithm are presented in "Social Distancing is Good for Points too!" (Flores-Velazco, 2020).