Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Assistant
AI Research Assistant
Well-researched responses based on relevant abstracts and paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 175 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 54 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 38 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 37 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 108 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 180 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 447 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.5 36 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

p-Steklov Problem: Nonlinear Spectral Analysis

Updated 14 November 2025
  • The p-Steklov problem is a nonlinear eigenvalue challenge that replaces the classical Laplacian with the p-Laplacian and employs nonlinear boundary conditions.
  • It uses variational principles and Rayleigh quotients to derive discrete spectra and analyze bifurcation, coercivity, and anisotropic effects.
  • Key applications include shape optimization, nonlinear spectral geometry, and the study of weighted boundary phenomena in differential equations.

The pp-Steklov problem is a nonlinear generalization of the classical Steklov eigenvalue problem, where the standard Laplacian is replaced by the pp-Laplace operator and the Steklov boundary condition involves nonlinearities, weights, or geometric data. This framework encapsulates a wide spectrum of problems, from pure function-theoretic and geometric settings to variational shape optimization and the analysis of non-homogeneous or weighted systems. The pp-Steklov problem serves as a central object in nonlinear spectral geometry, topological bifurcation theory, and elliptic partial differential equations on manifolds and Euclidean domains.

1. Canonical Formulation and Weak Solutions

Let ΩRN\Omega \subset \mathbb{R}^N (N2N \geq 2) be a bounded domain with Lipschitz boundary Ω\partial \Omega, and p(1,)p \in (1, \infty). The standard pp-Steklov eigenproblem for a (possibly indefinite) weight gL1(Ω)g \in L^1(\partial\Omega) seeks (λ,ϕ)R×(W1,p(Ω){0})(\lambda, \phi) \in \mathbb{R} \times (W^{1,p}(\Omega) \setminus \{0\}) satisfying: $\begin{cases} -\Delta_p \phi = 0 & \text{in } \Omega,\[2pt] |\nabla\phi|^{p-2} \frac{\partial \phi}{\partial \nu} = \lambda\, g\, |\phi|^{p-2}\phi & \text{on } \partial\Omega, \end{cases}$ where Δpϕ=div(ϕp2ϕ)\Delta_p \phi = \mathrm{div} (|\nabla \phi|^{p-2} \nabla \phi) and ν\frac{\partial}{\partial \nu} denotes the outer normal derivative.

A function ϕW1,p(Ω)\phi \in W^{1,p}(\Omega) is a weak solution if for all vW1,p(Ω)v \in W^{1,p}(\Omega),

Ωϕp2ϕv=λΩgϕp2ϕv.\int_\Omega |\nabla \phi|^{p-2}\nabla\phi \cdot \nabla v = \lambda \int_{\partial\Omega} g |\phi|^{p-2}\phi v.

These problems generalize the classical (p=2)(p=2) Steklov case and introduce significant nonlinear and analytic complexities, especially when weights gg are sign-changing or belong to function classes beyond LqL^q (e.g., Lorentz–Zygmund spaces) (Anoop et al., 2020).

2. Variational Principles and Spectral Properties

The principal eigenvalue for the pp-Steklov problem is characterized via the Rayleigh quotient: λ1=infϕ0ΩϕpΩgϕp.\lambda_1 = \inf_{\phi \neq 0}\frac{\displaystyle\int_\Omega |\nabla \phi|^p}{\displaystyle\int_{\partial\Omega} g |\phi|^p}. This infimum is attained under appropriate coercivity conditions, typically ensured by weighted Poincaré–Steklov inequalities. For admissible sign-changing gg in Lorentz–Zygmund classes, the principal eigenvalue λ1\lambda_1 is simple, isolated, and its eigenfunction ϕ1\phi_1 is in C1,α(Ω)C^{1,\alpha}(\overline{\Omega}) (Anoop et al., 2020).

For the Dirichlet-to-Neumann operator interpretation, the spectrum is discrete: 0=σ0,p<σ1,pσ2,p+,0 = \sigma_{0,p} < \sigma_{1,p} \leq \sigma_{2,p} \leq \ldots \to+\infty, and the eigenfunctions are orthogonal in the appropriate weighted boundary LpL^{p}-norm (Roth et al., 2022).

The variational principle extends to weighted and anisotropic models, with the Rayleigh quotient and constraints modified accordingly (Azami, 2022, Ascione et al., 2020). In orthotropic or anisotropic settings, the spectral quantities are governed by anisotropic norms (e.g., p\ell^p on gradients) and perimeters.

3. Nonlinear Bifurcation and Global Branches

Perturbations of the pp-Steklov problem, for example by adding nonlinearities or extra weights on the boundary, yield bifurcation problems of nonlinear elliptic type. The canonical model is: $\begin{cases} -\Delta_p \phi = 0 & \text{in } \Omega, \[2pt] |\nabla \phi|^{p-2} \frac{\partial \phi}{\partial \nu} = \lambda \left( g |\phi|^{p-2}\phi + f r(\phi) \right) & \text{on } \partial\Omega, \end{cases}$ with g,fg, f in Lorentz-Zygmund spaces and rC(R)r \in C(\mathbb{R}) satisfying r(0)=0r(0)=0 and suitable growth. Under natural trace-compactness assumptions, Leray–Schauder degree theory and the Rabinowitz global bifurcation framework guarantee the existence of a connected continuum CR×(W1,p{0})\mathcal{C} \subset \mathbb{R} \times (W^{1,p} \setminus \{0\}) of nontrivial solutions emanating from (λ1,0)(\lambda_1, 0). This continuum either becomes unbounded or connects to another eigenvalue of the unperturbed problem (Anoop et al., 2020).

Key technical tools include:

  • Poincaré–Steklov coercivity
  • Compactness of nonlinear trace operators for singular weights and nonlinearities
  • Degree jumps and eigenindex computations near bifurcation points (Anoop et al., 2020)

4. Geometric Bounds and Reilly-Type Inequalities

For pp-Steklov eigenvalues on Riemannian manifolds (possibly with density or weighted measure), geometric upper bounds are provided via variational and integral identities. In spaces with non-negative curvature,

σ1,pNp2V(M)HSLp(M)p1[infMtrhS]p1V(M),\sigma_{1,p} \leq N^{p-2} V(M) \frac{\|H_S\|_{L^p(\partial M)}^{p-1}}{[\inf_{\partial M} \mathrm{tr}_h S]^{p-1} V(\partial M)},

where HSH_S is the SS-weighted mean curvature vector, V(M)V(M) and V(M)V(\partial M) denote the volumes, NN is the ambient dimension, and SS is a symmetric positive-definite tensor on M\partial M (Roth et al., 2022). Related bounds for the weighted pp-Laplacian involve the Lp/(p1)L^{p/(p-1)}-norm of mean curvature and the measure induced by density (Azami, 2022).

Lower bounds of Escobar-type for the pp-Steklov problem on differential forms in warped product manifolds depend on principal curvatures and Betti-number corrections: σm(p)(M)(m+p)κ,\sigma^{(p)}_m(M) \geq (m+p)\, \kappa, where κ\kappa is the strict convexity parameter of the boundary and mm indexes the increment after accounting for kernel multiplicity determined by cohomology (Chakradhar, 28 Oct 2024). Rigidity and isospectrality can be characterized in the equality cases (e.g., balls in Rn\mathbb{R}^n).

5. Asymptotic and Extremal Behavior

The asymptotic theory of the pp-Steklov problem, especially as pp \to \infty, reveals strong geometric control over the first nontrivial eigenvalue Σ(Ω)\Sigma_\infty(\Omega), which converges to: Σ(Ω)=2diam1(Ω)\Sigma_\infty(\Omega) = \frac{2}{\mathrm{diam}_1(\Omega)} where diam1\mathrm{diam}_1 is the anisotropic 1\ell^1-diameter, and equality is achieved for extremal shapes (unit balls in anisotropic norms) (Ascione et al., 2020).

For shape optimization, the extremal domains for the ppth Steklov eigenvalue under fixed volume exhibit high regularity. Computational evidence for planar domains indicates for each pp (up to 101), the optimal domain (unique up to scaling and rigid motion) possesses pp-fold rotational symmetry plus a reflection symmetry. The associated eigenvalue multiplicity is 2 for even pp and 3 for odd p3p \geq 3, with optimized eigenvalues growing linearly with pp (Akhmetgaliyev et al., 2016).

In the exterior domain setting for the modified Helmholtz operator (pΔ)(p-\Delta) with Steklov boundary, spectral asymptotics and eigenfunction decay at infinity (depending on dd and trace properties) are relevant for applications in diffusion and stochastic processes. Numerical schemes using FEM with transparent boundary conditions have been successfully validated (Grebenkov et al., 13 Jul 2024).

6. Extensions: Weights, Mixed Operators, and Differential Forms

Weighted pp-Steklov problems consider variable boundary and domain weights (e.g., densities ff), leading to modified PDEs and boundary conditions for the weighted pp-Laplacian: Ap,fu=div(efup2u)A_{p,f} u = \mathrm{div}(e^{-f}|\nabla u|^{p-2}\nabla u) with corresponding variational principles, mean curvature corrections, and explicit geometric constants in Reilly-type inequalities (Azami, 2022). The structure of optimal constants, equality cases, and model solutions (such as self-shrinkers or geodesic balls) is characterized under these settings.

Further, Steklov-like boundary conditions extend to non-homogeneous (p,q)(p,q)-Laplacians and to differential pp-forms. In the latter, the Dirichlet-to-Neumann operator on coclosed forms produces spectra determined both by geometric curvature and topological invariants such as Betti numbers, with critical distinctions in spectral gaps and isospectrality compared to the function case (Chakradhar, 28 Oct 2024, Barbu et al., 2017).

7. Methodological and Analytical Techniques

Problems in the pp-Steklov category leverage analytic frameworks from:

  • Calculus of variations: direct minimization, min–max principles, and constraint manifolds
  • Critical point theory and bifurcation analysis (degree theory, index jumps, Rabinowitz global bifurcation)
  • Weighted and anisotropic trace theory (compactness in Lorentz–Zygmund spaces)
  • Geometric analysis for Reilly-type identities, involving mean curvature, divergence-free tensors, and weighted volume forms
  • Numerical analysis (shape derivatives, boundary integral methods, spectral discretization, FEM with transparent or nonstandard boundary conditions)

Across settings—Euclidean, weighted, anisotropic, or submanifold—existence, regularity, and sharp bounds for the pp-Steklov spectrum are governed by the variational structure, the geometry/topology of the domain and boundary, and the nonlinearities present in both the interior and on the boundary.


The mathematical and analytic landscape of pp-Steklov problems thus encompasses bifurcation phenomena, sharp analytic inequalities, explicit spectral asymptotics, intricate geometric dependencies, and significant numerical and computational challenges (Anoop et al., 2020, Akhmetgaliyev et al., 2016, Roth et al., 2022, Chakradhar, 28 Oct 2024, Azami, 2022, Ascione et al., 2020, Grebenkov et al., 13 Jul 2024, Barbu et al., 2017).

Forward Email Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow Topic

Get notified by email when new papers are published related to $p$-Steklov Problem.