Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
2000 character limit reached

Noether–Wald Formalism in Gravity

Updated 26 December 2025
  • Noether–Wald formalism is a covariant framework that defines conserved charges and thermodynamic relations for diffeomorphism-invariant gravity.
  • It constructs phase-space currents, potentials, and Noether charges to unify black hole mechanics, the first law of thermodynamics, and entropy assignment.
  • The formalism extends to include higher-curvature corrections, variable couplings, and quantum effects, offering insights into supergravity and black hole chemistry.

The Noether–Wald formalism—also known as the Iyer–Wald formalism—provides a covariant geometric mechanism to assign conserved charges and a consistent thermodynamic structure to diffeomorphism-invariant theories of gravity. It generalizes Noether’s theorem to local gauge symmetries, offering a unified basis for black hole mechanics, the first law of thermodynamics, and entropy assignment in gravitational theories with variable couplings or higher-curvature corrections. The formalism is predicated on the construction of phase-space currents and potentials that reflect the underlying geometry, symmetries, and boundary structure of spacetime solutions, and plays a central role in both classical and quantum gravity; including applications to supergravity, gauge theories, higher-derivative gravity, and black hole thermodynamics (Chen et al., 6 Aug 2025).

1. Covariant Phase-Space Construction and Variation

A diffeomorphism-invariant gravitational theory is defined by an n-form Lagrangian L[ϕ]\mathbf{L}[\phi], with ϕ\phi denoting all dynamical fields, typically the metric gμνg_{\mu\nu} and possibly matter or gauge fields. A generic variation yields

δL=Eϕδϕ+dΘ[ϕ,δϕ],\delta \mathbf{L} = \mathbf{E}^{\phi} \cdot \delta\phi + d\boldsymbol{\Theta}[\phi, \delta\phi],

where Eϕ\mathbf{E}^{\phi} are the Euler–Lagrange equations of motion forms (vanishing on-shell), and Θ[ϕ,δϕ]\boldsymbol{\Theta}[\phi, \delta\phi] is the symplectic potential current (an (n1)(n-1)-form) (Chen et al., 6 Aug 2025). The presymplectic (symplectic) current is defined as

ω=δ1Θ[δ2ϕ]δ2Θ[δ1ϕ].\omega = \delta_1 \Theta[\delta_2 \phi] - \delta_2 \Theta[\delta_1 \phi].

Aggregating over all field variations produces a geometric structure on the covariant phase space, enabling the definition of conserved currents and charges associated to local symmetries (e.g., diffeomorphisms, gauge or supersymmetry transformations).

2. Noether Current and Noether–Wald Charge

For any vector field ξ\xi generating a diffeomorphism, the Noether current is constructed as

JξΘ[ϕ,Lξϕ]ξL,\mathbf{J}_\xi \equiv \boldsymbol{\Theta}[\phi, \mathcal{L}_\xi \phi] - \xi \cdot \mathbf{L},

where Lξ\mathcal{L}_\xi is the Lie derivative and ξL\xi \cdot \mathbf{L} denotes interior contraction with the n-form Lagrangian (Chen et al., 6 Aug 2025). On-shell (Eϕ=0\mathbf{E}^\phi = 0), dJξ=0d\mathbf{J}_\xi = 0, so locally there exists a Noether charge (n−2)-form QξQ_\xi such that

Jξ=dQξ.\mathbf{J}_\xi = d Q_\xi.

In Einstein–Hilbert gravity, the explicit expressions are

Θμ(δg)=116πG(gμαβδgαβgαβμδgαβ)ϵμ,\boldsymbol{\Theta}^\mu(\delta g)=\frac{1}{16\pi G}\left(g^{\mu\alpha}\nabla^\beta \delta g_{\alpha\beta} - g^{\alpha\beta}\nabla^\mu \delta g_{\alpha\beta}\right)\epsilon_\mu,

Qξμν=116πG(μξννξμ)ϵμν.Q_\xi^{\mu\nu} = -\frac{1}{16\pi G}(\nabla^\mu \xi^\nu - \nabla^\nu \xi^\mu) \epsilon_{\mu\nu}.

3. Hamiltonian Identity, Black Hole Laws, and Generalizations

The formalism associates the variation of the Hamiltonian generating flow along ξ\xi to a boundary integral:

δHξ=Σ(δQξξΘ[ϕ,δϕ]),\delta H_\xi = \oint_{\partial \Sigma} (\delta Q_\xi - \xi \cdot \Theta[\phi, \delta\phi]),

where Σ\Sigma is a Cauchy surface and Σ\partial\Sigma its boundary, typically split into spatial infinity and the bifurcation surface (the black hole horizon) (Chen et al., 6 Aug 2025). Setting δHξ=0\delta H_\xi=0 for horizon Killing vectors leads to the geometric first law:

δM=TδS+\delta M = T \delta S + \cdots

with mass, angular momentum, electric/magnetic charge, and entropy realized as Noether–Wald charges on appropriate boundaries (Chen et al., 6 Aug 2025, Ortin et al., 2022).

Importantly, Wald’s formalism realizes entropy as the horizon Noether charge, extending beyond Bekenstein–Hawking to higher-derivative or nonlocal actions, e.g., yielding

SWald=2πHεμνδLδRμνρσερσdA,S_{\text{Wald}} = -2\pi \oint_H \varepsilon_{\mu\nu} \frac{\delta L}{\delta R_{\mu\nu\rho\sigma}} \varepsilon_{\rho\sigma} dA,

where εμν\varepsilon_{\mu\nu} is the binormal to the bifurcation surface HH and dAdA its area element (Aros et al., 2013).

4. Thermodynamic Extensions: Variable Couplings and Restricted Phase Space

The Iyer–Wald formalism admits consistent extension to “black hole chemistry,” treating couplings such as Newton’s constant GG or cosmological constant Λ\Lambda as thermodynamic variables (Chen et al., 6 Aug 2025, Xiao et al., 2023). The extended variation δ~\tilde{\delta} acts on both field and coupling space, so

δ~L=Eϕδ~ϕ+dΘ[δ~ϕ]+Fgδ~Gϵ,\tilde{\delta}\mathbf{L} = \mathbf{E}^{\phi} \tilde{\delta}\phi + d\Theta[\tilde{\delta}\phi] + F_g \tilde{\delta}G\, \epsilon,

with Fg=(L/G)ϕF_g = (\partial L/\partial G)_{\phi} and ϵ\epsilon the volume form (Chen et al., 6 Aug 2025).

This produces additional terms in the Hamiltonian identity. For the Schwarzschild–AdS solution, one finds

δ~M=Tδ~S+μgδ~C,\tilde{\delta}M = T \tilde{\delta}S + \mu_g \tilde{\delta}C,

where Cl2/GC \propto l^2/G is a central charge and μg\mu_g its conjugate chemical potential (Chen et al., 6 Aug 2025). A genuine Euler (Smarr) relation emerges:

M=TS+μgC,M = T S + \mu_g C,

mirroring classical extensivity in thermodynamics. The formalism is geometric, and all thermodynamic variables arise from boundary Noether charges associated to the underlying symmetries.

5. Extensions to Matter, Higher-Rank Fields, and Quantum Corrections

The construction applies equally to gravity plus arbitrary matter, gauge fields, and higher-form potentials, with explicit expressions for the corresponding Noether–Wald charges [(Ortin et al., 2022); (Aros et al., 2013)]. Electric and magnetic work terms enter the first law and Smarr relations:

δM=TδS+ΩiδJi+iΦe(i)δQe(i)+aΦm(a)δQm(a).\delta M = T \delta S + \Omega_i \delta J^i + \sum_i \Phi_e^{(i)} \delta Q_e^{(i)} + \sum_a \Phi_m^{(a)} \delta Q_m^{(a)}.

For quantum corrections, Wald entropy admits universal logarithmic corrections induced by conformal anomalies, computable as Noether charges of the integrated anomaly functional (Aros et al., 2013). The formalism also matches corrected entanglement entropy and captures both type-A and type-B Weyl anomalies.

6. Higher-Derivative and Gauge Theories: Chern–Simons and Critical Gravity

The formalism generalizes to higher-derivative (curvature) gravity and gauge theories with Chern–Simons terms, using the “E-tensor” Eμνρσ=L/RμνρσE^{\mu\nu\rho\sigma} = \partial L/\partial R_{\mu\nu\rho\sigma} [(Azeyanagi et al., 2014); (Anastasiou et al., 2021); (Anastasiou et al., 2017)]. Noether–Wald charges remain manifestly covariant, with corrections reflecting the higher-curvature structure:

Qμν[ξ]=2Eμνρσρξσ.Q^{\mu\nu}[\xi] = -2 E^{\mu\nu\rho\sigma} \nabla_\rho \xi_\sigma.

In critical points of higher-derivative gravity, all Noether–Wald charges may vanish identically for Einstein solutions, reflecting degenerate vacua (Anastasiou et al., 2021, Anastasiou et al., 2017).

In the case of higher-dimensional Chern–Simons theories, the covariant version of Noether–Wald charge incorporates anomaly polynomials, contrasts with earlier non-covariant constructions, and yields the correct entropy on bifurcation surfaces (Azeyanagi et al., 2014).

7. Generalizations: Weyl Invariance, Supergravity, and Dynamical Horizons

Weyl-invariant and unimodular gravities incorporate transverse diffeomorphisms and Weyl symmetry into the Noether–Wald construction. The Weyl current vanishes identically, while the cosmological constant enters dynamically, allowing δΛ\delta \Lambda in first laws and Smarr relations (Alonso-Serrano et al., 2022, Alonso-Serrano et al., 2022).

In supergravity, conserved Noether–Wald charges incorporate both bosonic and fermionic (gravitino) contributions, requiring Killing supervectors (vector-spinor pairs) that preserve invariance under diffeomorphisms, Lorentz transformations, and local supersymmetry up to total derivatives (Bandos et al., 2023, Bandos et al., 1 Nov 2024). The charge 2-form in N=1, D=4 supergravity is:

Q[ξ,κ]=116πGN{(eaeb)Pab[ξ,κ]+2ψˉγ5κ},Q[\xi,\kappa] = \frac{1}{16\pi G_N}\left\{ \star(e^a \wedge e^b) P_{ab}[\xi,\kappa] + 2 \bar{\psi} \wedge \gamma_5 \kappa \right\} ,

where PabP_{ab} incorporates both the usual Killing vector and the Killing spinor partner.

The formalism also admits generalization to null hypersurfaces, providing local and dynamical definitions of horizon entropy through improved Noether charges. Different choices of symplectic potential yield entropy definitions (Dirichlet vs. York) with distinct physical properties, satisfying generalized first and second laws on dynamical, non-stationary horizons (Rignon-Bret, 2023).


The Noether–Wald formalism offers a unifying framework for gravitational thermodynamics and for charges in diffeomorphism-invariant theories, providing geometric derivations of the first law, exact formulas for entropy, protocols for the inclusion of variable couplings, and robust generalizations to supersymmetric, higher-rank, and quantum corrected settings [(Chen et al., 6 Aug 2025); (Alonso-Serrano et al., 2022); (Bandos et al., 2023); (Xiao et al., 2023); (Azeyanagi et al., 2014); (Ortin et al., 2022); (Aros et al., 2013); (Anastasiou et al., 2021); (Anastasiou et al., 2017); (Rignon-Bret, 2023)].

Whiteboard

Topic to Video (Beta)

Follow Topic

Get notified by email when new papers are published related to Noether–Wald Formalism.