Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Assistant
AI Research Assistant
Well-researched responses based on relevant abstracts and paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 60 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 54 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 30 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 35 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 49 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 182 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 433 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.5 35 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Quasi-Local Off-Shell ADT Formalism

Updated 12 September 2025
  • The quasi-local off-shell ADT formalism is a covariant method for computing conserved charges without imposing field equations, enabling analysis over arbitrary codimension-two surfaces.
  • It integrates contributions from gravity, gauge fields, and Chern–Simons terms, ensuring gauge invariance even in non-standard asymptotic conditions.
  • The framework underpins applications in black hole thermodynamics and dual CFTs, and it is equivalent to other covariant phase space methods and cohomological approaches.

The quasi-local off-shell Abbott–Deser–Tekin (ADT) formalism is a covariant method for defining and computing conserved charges associated with diffeomorphism and internal gauge symmetries in a wide array of classical field theories, especially gravity theories with arbitrary matter content and gauge fields. Distinguished by its “off-shell” construction—meaning the field equations need not be imposed—the formalism produces conserved currents and potentials whose surface integrals on arbitrary codimension-two spacelike surfaces yield quasi-local charges. These quasi-local conserved quantities are central to the analysis of black holes, asymptotic symmetries, the thermodynamics of gravitational systems, and gauge/gravity dualities. The framework, and several generalizations, have proven effective for cases including higher-curvature theories, non-trivial asymptotics, theories with Chern–Simons terms, and Palatini or teleparallel gravity.

1. Fundamental Concepts and Off-Shell Generalization

Originally, the Abbott–Deser–Tekin approach constructed conserved currents on-shell by exploiting the linearized equations of motion and background symmetries. The off-shell generalization eschews the need for background solutions or explicitly imposing equations of motion. Given a diffeomorphism- and gauge-invariant Lagrangian L[Φ]\mathcal{L}[\Phi] (with collective fields Φ\Phi including gμνg_{\mu\nu}, AμA_\mu, scalars, or higher pp-forms), the variation

δ(gL)=gEΦδΦ+μ(gΘμ(δΦ,Φ))\delta (\sqrt{-g} \mathcal{L}) = -\sqrt{-g} E_{\Phi} \delta\Phi + \partial_\mu (\sqrt{-g} \Theta^\mu(\delta\Phi, \Phi))

yields both the Euler–Lagrange expressions EΦE_\Phi and a surface term Θμ\Theta^\mu. The off-shell ADT current JADTμJ^\mu_{ADT} is defined such that

JADTμ(ϵ)=δEμ(Φ;ϵ)+surface contributionsJ^\mu_{ADT}(\epsilon) = \delta E^\mu(\Phi; \epsilon) + \text{surface contributions}

where ϵ\epsilon collectively denotes the symmetry generator, which is often a pair (ξμ,Λ)(\xi^\mu, \Lambda) for diffeomorphism and internal (e.g., U(1)U(1)) symmetry transformations (Ding et al., 2019). The current obeys μJADTμ=0\partial_\mu J^\mu_{ADT} = 0 off-shell, leading to an antisymmetric ADT potential QADTμνQ_{ADT}^{\mu\nu} such that JADTμ=νQADTμνJ^\mu_{ADT} = \partial_\nu Q_{ADT}^{\mu\nu}.

Importantly, the charge associated with a symmetry is defined along a one-parameter path s[0,1]s \in [0,1] in solution space as

Q(ϵ)=116πG01dsΣdD2xμν[δKμν(ϵ)+]Q(\epsilon) = \frac{1}{16\pi G} \int_0^1 ds \int_\Sigma d^{D-2}x_{\mu\nu} \left[ \delta K^{\mu\nu}(\epsilon) + \cdots \right]

where Σ\Sigma is a codimension-two surface and δKμν\delta K^{\mu\nu} is the variation of the Noether potential (Ding et al., 2019). This construction does not require vanishing of the equations of motion or imposition of asymptotic boundary conditions, providing a genuinely quasi-local and off-shell definition.

2. Incorporating Arbitrary Matter and Gauge Fields

The formalism applies to general Lagrangians with gravity, arbitrary matter fields, gauge fields, and Chern–Simons-like terms. In the presence of gauge fields, the symmetry generator is extended to ϵ=(ξ,Λ)\epsilon = (\xi, \Lambda). The symmetry transformation acts as δϵA=LξA+dΛ\delta_\epsilon A = \mathcal{L}_\xi A + d\Lambda (for Abelian gauge theory), and the Noether current, surface term, and ADT potential acquire contributions from both diffeomorphism and internal gauge variations (Ding et al., 2019).

Specific care is taken for situations in which the Lagrangian is not manifestly covariant, such as when Chern–Simons terms are present. Non-covariant pieces introduce supplementary contributions to the ADT potential, but these do not alter the value of the total conserved charge after integration (Ding et al., 2019).

Notably, this generalized construction overcomes several deficiencies of older approaches—e.g., the necessity for fields to decay rapidly enough at infinity—and is capable of dealing with slowly decaying (or non-vanishing) matter fields and their contributions to global charges (Ding et al., 2019, Peng, 2016).

3. Quasi-Local Charges and Surface Integrals

A distinguishing property is that conserved charges are defined on arbitrary spacelike codimension-two surfaces Σ\Sigma. The quasi-local formulation is essential in scenarios where global spatial infinity is ambiguous (as in black hole interiors, near horizon geometry, or non-trivial topology) or where the symmetry of interest is only asymptotic, such as asymptotic BMS symmetry in flat space (Hyun et al., 2014, Setare et al., 2016).

Quasi-locality facilitates checks of the independence of the chosen surface under small deformations—provided the region bound by two surfaces satisfies the linearized equations and symmetries—and yields physically meaningful conserved charges across different patches (e.g., at horizon, at infinity, or at non-trivial boundaries).

The explicit conserved charge formula often takes the form

Q(ϵ)=116πGΣQADTμνdSμνQ(\epsilon) = \frac{1}{16\pi G} \int_{\Sigma} Q_{ADT}^{\mu\nu} dS_{\mu\nu}

with QADTμνQ_{ADT}^{\mu\nu} receiving contributions from gravity, gauge, scalar, and Chern–Simons sectors, which are all computed without imposing on-shell conditions (Ding et al., 2019, Peng, 2016).

4. Symmetries, Central Extensions, and Algebraic Structure

The quasi-local off-shell ADT formalism is compatible with a wide range of symmetry structures, including exact and asymptotic Killing vectors, field-dependent symmetry generators, and infinite-dimensional algebras such as BMS4_4, Virasoro, and their non-central extensions. Field-dependent symmetry generators require modifications to ensure conservation; the ADT current and potential include additional terms involving the variation of the surface term and the symplectic structure (Setare et al., 2016).

The algebraic structure of the resulting conserved charges reflects the underlying symmetry algebra. For diffeomorphisms generating the Witt algebra, for instance, the commutator of two charges acquires a central extension term, which is explicitly computable in the formalism and matches the central charges in dual conformal field theories (Setare et al., 2015). The formalism is thus compatible with the covariant phase space method, the Barnich–Brandt–Compère (BBC) cohomological approach, and produces the correct algebraic relations among charges.

5. Applications to Black Hole Physics and Thermodynamics

The formalism has been vital in computing the mass, angular momentum, electric charge, and entropy of diverse black hole solutions—including Kerr–AdS, BTZ, Kerr–Sen, Gödel black holes, and generalized higher-dimensional black holes in string and supergravity theories (Ding et al., 2019, Peng, 2016, Setare et al., 2015, Jing et al., 2017). The off-shell and quasi-local nature guarantees that the formalism correctly incorporates contributions from all sectors—including slowly decaying scalar fields, non-vanishing gauge fields at infinity, and Chern–Simons-like terms—which may otherwise render charges divergent or ambiguous.

The procedure commonly involves:

  • Identifying the exact or asymptotic symmetry generator (e.g., timelike or rotational Killing vector).
  • Computing the appropriate linearized variations of the fields under the solution parameter perturbations (e.g., δm,δa\delta m, \delta a for mass and spin).
  • Evaluating the conserved potential QADTμνQ_{ADT}^{\mu\nu} and integrating over the relevant surface, following the one-parameter path in solution space (Ding et al., 2019, Peng, 2019).

Central extension terms and the algebra of charges furnish the structure constants and central charges necessary for matching dual CFT predictions (e.g., via the Cardy formula), and all physical quantities—mass, angular momentum, entropy—are reproduced consistently with thermodynamic expectations.

6. Equivalence with Other Covariant Phase Space Approaches

A key result is that the quasi-local off-shell ADT formalism, including its generalizations, is mathematically equivalent to both the covariant phase space method (CPSM) and the BBC cohomological approach (Ding et al., 2019, Peng, 2016). The equivalence is expressed via a direct relation between the off-shell ADT potential and the symplectic potential and current of the covariant phase space. The physical conserved charges thus obtained are unchanged after accounting for possible total derivative ambiguities or non-covariant surface terms.

In the explicit formulas, the correspondence is established by integrating infinitesimal variations along a path in solution space and identifying the potential difference with the symplectic structure, ensuring consistent charge algebra and gauge invariance (Ding et al., 2019).

7. Extensions, Limitations, and Future Directions

The method has been further extended to:

  • Theories with arbitrary pp-form fields, multiple scalars, and higher curvature corrections (Peng, 2016).
  • The Palatini and teleparallel formulations, with independent affine connections, torsion, and non-metricity (Ding et al., 2020).
  • Asymptotic symmetry algebras with field-dependent generators and non-central charge extensions (Setare et al., 2016, Larsson, 2015).

A critical requirement is the appropriate handling of the reference background for non-asymptotically flat or non-static spacetimes; improper choice may render charges non-integrable or unphysical, as in Kerr–AdS backgrounds, underscoring the background-dependence of the ADT formalism (Jing et al., 2017).

The systematic inclusion of non-Abelian gauge symmetries and further exploration of non-trivial asymptotic and near-horizon structures remain active areas. Applications to black hole microstate counting, holographic dualities, and gravitational entropy in theories with non-traditional matter content are also ongoing.


The quasi-local off-shell ADT formalism thus provides a robust, covariant, and widely applicable framework for defining, computing, and interpreting conserved charges in gauge theories of gravity with arbitrary matter content, encompassing both physical applications to black hole thermodynamics and deeper explorations of symmetry and conservation in gravity and field theory.

Forward Email Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow Topic

Get notified by email when new papers are published related to Quasi-Local Off-Shell ADT Formalism.