Multiple zeta star functions are star variants of Euler–Zagier multiple zeta functions, defined using weak inequalities that enable studies in analytic, combinatorial, and arithmetic frameworks.
They utilize integral representations, generating functions, and determinant identities to derive explicit special value formulas and connect to Schur-type generalizations.
Recent research employs Stirling and Bell polynomials to evaluate MZSFs at non-positive integers, revealing deep links with regular multiple zeta functions and positive-characteristic theories.
Multiple zeta star functions (MZSFs) are star-variants of Euler–Zagier multiple zeta functions in which weak inequalities replace strict ones. In depth r, they are given by
ζr⋆(s1,…,sr)=0<n1≤n2≤⋯≤nr∑n1s1⋯nrsr1,
and the corresponding multiple zeta-star values arise by specializing to positive integer indices. Recent work places MZSFs at the intersection of analytic continuation, iterated integrals, generating functions, Schur-theoretic determinant identities, Bell- and Stirling-polynomial expansions, positive-characteristic zeta theory, and Diophantine approximation. The subject is now broad enough that the same object is routinely studied as a multivariable meromorphic function, a period-like integral, a quasi-symmetric specialization, and a source of explicit special-value formulae (Ishii et al., 18 Aug 2025).
1. Definitions, domains, and basic variants
For an index k=(k1,…,kn) of positive integers with k1≥2, the multiple zeta-star value is
ζ⋆(k)=m1≥⋯≥mn≥1∑m1k1⋯mnkn1.
The weak inequalities distinguish the star theory from the ordinary multiple zeta function, where the summation is strict. In the function-theoretic setting, ζr⋆(s1,…,sr) converges in a domain Dr, admits meromorphic continuation, and has known singularities. For identical arguments, the standard shorthand is
These regular and reverse values play a central role in explicit evaluation theorems at non-positive integers (Ishii et al., 18 Aug 2025).
The same star principle extends to a substantial family of variants. Finite and symmetric multiple zeta-star values support Ohno-type generating functions (Hirose et al., 2019). Multiple Hurwitz zeta-star functions admit analogous sum formulae (Chen, 2017). Multiple star ζr⋆(s1,…,sr)=0<n1≤n2≤⋯≤nr∑n1s1⋯nrsr1,2-values
form the odd-denominator analogue of MZSFs (Chung, 2016). In positive characteristic, one has ζr⋆(s1,…,sr)=0<n1≤n2≤⋯≤nr∑n1s1⋯nrsr1,4-adic and ζr⋆(s1,…,sr)=0<n1≤n2≤⋯≤nr∑n1s1⋯nrsr1,5-adic multiple zeta star functions defined by weakly decreasing degree indices rather than integer summation variables (Matsuzuki, 2022).
2. Relations with ordinary multiple zeta functions and Schur-type generalizations
A foundational fact is that MZSFs and ordinary multiple zeta functions (MZFs) are mutually convertible by summing over all ways of merging adjacent arguments: ζr⋆(s1,…,sr)=0<n1≤n2≤⋯≤nr∑n1s1⋯nrsr1,6
where ζr⋆(s1,…,sr)=0<n1≤n2≤⋯≤nr∑n1s1⋯nrsr1,7 is the length of ζr⋆(s1,…,sr)=0<n1≤n2≤⋯≤nr∑n1s1⋯nrsr1,8. This already shows that the star operation is not merely a notational variant: it is tied to a specific composition-refinement combinatorics (Nakasuji et al., 2017).
That relation becomes especially sharp at non-positive integers. If ζr⋆(s1,…,sr)=0<n1≤n2≤⋯≤nr∑n1s1⋯nrsr1,9 with k=(k1,…,kn)0, then
k=(k1,…,kn)1
where k=(k1,…,kn)2. A common misconception is that star and non-star values are always substantially different; the non-positive integer theory shows that, under this hypothesis, the difference collapses to a sign, even though other parts of the theory retain distinct combinatorial content (Ishii et al., 18 Aug 2025).
Schur multiple zeta functions provide a combinatorial interpolation between MZFs and MZSFs. For a partition k=(k1,…,kn)3, the Schur multiple zeta function is a sum over semi-standard Young tableaux. The one-column case k=(k1,…,kn)4 recovers the ordinary multiple zeta function, while the one-row case k=(k1,…,kn)5 recovers the MZSF. Under content parametrization, hook-type Schur multiple zeta functions decompose explicitly into products of ordinary and star zeta functions: k=(k1,…,kn)6
and arbitrary shapes are then reconstructed via the Giambelli determinant. This places MZSFs inside a larger Schur-theoretic framework governed by Frobenius coordinates, determinant identities, and root-system analogues (Matsumoto et al., 2023, Nakasuji et al., 2017).
3. Explicit special values: Stirling polynomials, Bell polynomials, and singularities
A major recent development is the explicit evaluation of MZSFs at non-positive integers by Stirling polynomials. Let k=(k1,…,kn)7, k=(k1,…,kn)8, k=(k1,…,kn)9, and k1≥20. If k1≥21 denotes the Stirling polynomial of the second kind, defined by
k1≥22
then the reverse value of the depth-k1≥23 MZSF is given explicitly by
k1≥24
The same paper gives recurrences and a Gregory-coefficient expansion for reverse values, extending a line of work associated with Matsusaka, Murahara, and Onozuka. The generalized Gregory coefficientsk1≥25 are defined by
k1≥26
and reverse values are expressed as finite sums built from these coefficients and Stirling-polynomial weights (Ishii et al., 18 Aug 2025).
For identical arguments, harmonic-product recurrences lead to Bell-polynomial formulae. For k1≥27 and k1≥28,
k1≥29
and more explicitly
ζ⋆(k)=m1≥⋯≥mn≥1∑m1k1⋯mnkn1.0
Equivalently,
ζ⋆(k)=m1≥⋯≥mn≥1∑m1k1⋯mnkn1.1
where ζ⋆(k)=m1≥⋯≥mn≥1∑m1k1⋯mnkn1.2 is the complete Bell polynomial. This makes the singularity structure accessible through the poles of ζ⋆(k)=m1≥⋯≥mn≥1∑m1k1⋯mnkn1.3. The same work notes that the star function has the same possible singularities as the non-star function at the points ζ⋆(k)=m1≥⋯≥mn≥1∑m1k1⋯mnkn1.4, and that the Bell-polynomial formula gives a direct route to residues and pole orders. It also records special values such as
ζ⋆(k)=m1≥⋯≥mn≥1∑m1k1⋯mnkn1.5
These formulae complement the non-positive integer theory by showing that the identical-argument specialization has its own closed algebraic model (Mehta, 28 Mar 2026).
4. Generating functions, block structures, and explicit families
Generating functions are one of the most effective ways to organize MZSF families. For repeated blocks of length ζ⋆(k)=m1≥⋯≥mn≥1∑m1k1⋯mnkn1.6,
ζ⋆(k)=m1≥⋯≥mn≥1∑m1k1⋯mnkn1.7
For more complicated patterns, generating series can often be converted into hypergeometric expressions and then attacked by creative telescoping (Au et al., 2024).
One influential line of work develops generating functions for arbitrary patterns of blocks of ζ⋆(k)=m1≥⋯≥mn≥1∑m1k1⋯mnkn1.8s and intervening indices, expressing MZSFs in terms of multiple alternating Euler sums and reducing the lengths of blocks of twos. In particular, explicit series are obtained for
ζ⋆(k)=m1≥⋯≥mn≥1∑m1k1⋯mnkn1.9
with the coefficients controlled by multiple sharp sums ζr⋆(s1,…,sr)0. This yields a systematic block-reduction principle for star values that had previously been available only in special configurations (Pilehrood et al., 2018).
Specific index families have been worked out in closed form. For the 3–2–1 sector, generating-function methods and Bell-polynomial expansions yield explicit formulae for ζr⋆(s1,…,sr)1, ζr⋆(s1,…,sr)2, and the generalized families
ζr⋆(s1,…,sr)3
including product formulae for the corresponding generating functions in terms of trigonometric factors and coefficient formulae in Bernoulli numbers (Pilehrood et al., 2018). A different strand, based on creative telescoping, establishes new evaluations for block patterns such as ζr⋆(s1,…,sr)4, reducing them to polynomials in Riemann zeta values after first passing through interpolated half-values: ζr⋆(s1,…,sr)5
The paper also treats ζr⋆(s1,…,sr)6, ζr⋆(s1,…,sr)7, and ζr⋆(s1,…,sr)8 by the same pipeline (Au et al., 2024).
Finite and symmetric star values support their own generating-function theory. For an index ζr⋆(s1,…,sr)9, Kaneko’s conjecture for Dr0 was confirmed and generalized to arbitrary depth-three indices. If
Dr1
then for Dr2,
Dr3
and for Dr4,
Dr5
These formulas encode duality through the Hoffman dual and show that, in the finite and symmetric settings, depth-three Ohno-type sums reduce to quadratic forms in depth-one series (Hirose et al., 2019).
5. Integral, cyclic, and combinatorial frameworks
An integral theory for MZSFs parallel to the classical iterated-integral theory of ordinary multiple zeta values was established by Yamamoto. For an index Dr6, let Dr7 and
Dr8
With Dr9 and ζr⋆(s):=ζr⋆(s,…,s),0, one has
ζr⋆(s):=ζr⋆(s,…,s),1
where ζr⋆(s):=ζr⋆(s,…,s),2 is determined by alternating inequalities ζr⋆(s):=ζr⋆(s,…,s),3 or ζr⋆(s):=ζr⋆(s,…,s),4 according to membership in ζr⋆(s):=ζr⋆(s,…,s),5. For ζr⋆(s):=ζr⋆(s,…,s),6,
ζr⋆(s):=ζr⋆(s,…,s),7
This integral formalism is subsumed by the more general theory of admissible 2-labeled posets. If ζr⋆(s):=ζr⋆(s,…,s),8 is such a poset, then
ζr⋆(s):=ζr⋆(s,…,s),9
with multiplicativity, decomposition under refinement of incomparable elements, and duality ζ0⋆(∅)=10. The same framework covers MZVs, MZSFs, Arakawa–Kaneko zeta values, Mordell–Tornheim zeta values, and root-system zeta functions of type ζ0⋆(∅)=11 (Yamamoto, 2014).
Cyclic relations extend the algebraic structure beyond integral representations. The cyclic relation of Hirose, Murakami, and Murahara was generalized to complex variables, and the specialization to positive integers recovers the cyclic sum formula for multiple zeta-star values: ζ0⋆(∅)=12
The complex-variable version places star and non-star cyclic identities inside a unified analytic framework that also includes derivation relations (Murahara et al., 2020).
Several explicitly evaluable star families were obtained by integral and iterated-integral methods. Examples include polynomial expressions for
ζ0⋆(∅)=13
in terms of classical zeta values, polylogarithms, and powers of ζ0⋆(∅)=14 (Xu, 2017), as well as explicit relations between MZSVs, Kaneko–Yamamoto type MZVs, alternating MZVs, and the Apéry-type multiple zeta ζ0⋆(∅)=15-star values
ζ0⋆(∅)=16
which are shown in many cases to be ζ0⋆(∅)=17-linear combinations of alternating MZVs (Xu, 2020).
6. Arithmetic extensions, positive characteristic, and limiting-set phenomena
In positive characteristic, MZSFs admit ζ0⋆(∅)=18-adic and ζ0⋆(∅)=19-adic analogues. With l=(l1,…,lr)∈Z≥0r0, l=(l1,…,lr)∈Z≥0r1, and l=(l1,…,lr)∈Z≥0r2, the l=(l1,…,lr)∈Z≥0r3-adic star function is
l=(l1,…,lr)∈Z≥0r4
while the l=(l1,…,lr)∈Z≥0r5-adic version is
l=(l1,…,lr)∈Z≥0r6
Both are rigid analytic; for l=(l1,…,lr)∈Z≥0r7 they recover the single-variable zeta functions of Carlitz–Goss and Goss. A central relation is the orthogonal property
l=(l1,…,lr)∈Z≥0r8
with a parallel identity in the l=(l1,…,lr)∈Z≥0r9-adic setting. The same theory gives integral expressions for negative integer values, Kummer-type congruences such as
and recursive links between ζr⋆(s1,…,sr)=0<n1≤n2≤⋯≤nr∑n1s1⋯nrsr1,01-adic and ζr⋆(s1,…,sr)=0<n1≤n2≤⋯≤nr∑n1s1⋯nrsr1,02-adic star values (Matsuzuki, 2022).
A separate arithmetic direction studies the set of multiple zeta-star values itself as a subset of the real line. The set ζr⋆(s1,…,sr)=0<n1≤n2≤⋯≤nr∑n1s1⋯nrsr1,03 of all multiple zeta-star values is a countable dense subset of ζr⋆(s1,…,sr)=0<n1≤n2≤⋯≤nr∑n1s1⋯nrsr1,04. A Dirichlet-type criterion characterizes when ζr⋆(s1,…,sr)=0<n1≤n2≤⋯≤nr∑n1s1⋯nrsr1,05 belongs to ζr⋆(s1,…,sr)=0<n1≤n2≤⋯≤nr∑n1s1⋯nrsr1,06, and a Khinchin-type zero-one law states that for
one has ζr⋆(s1,…,sr)=0<n1≤n2≤⋯≤nr∑n1s1⋯nrsr1,08 if ζr⋆(s1,…,sr)=0<n1≤n2≤⋯≤nr∑n1s1⋯nrsr1,09 converges and ζr⋆(s1,…,sr)=0<n1≤n2≤⋯≤nr∑n1s1⋯nrsr1,10 if it diverges (Li, 30 Mar 2025).
Finite multiple star harmonic sums admit an analytic interpolation built from divided differences. For fixed ζr⋆(s1,…,sr)=0<n1≤n2≤⋯≤nr∑n1s1⋯nrsr1,11,
where ζr⋆(s1,…,sr)=0<n1≤n2≤⋯≤nr∑n1s1⋯nrsr1,15 is a divided difference and the Hermite–Genocchi formula is used to prove analyticity. For real ζr⋆(s1,…,sr)=0<n1≤n2≤⋯≤nr∑n1s1⋯nrsr1,16, the resulting map ζr⋆(s1,…,sr)=0<n1≤n2≤⋯≤nr∑n1s1⋯nrsr1,17 is a bijection onto ζr⋆(s1,…,sr)=0<n1≤n2≤⋯≤nr∑n1s1⋯nrsr1,18, giving a finite zeta-star correspondence; for complex ζr⋆(s1,…,sr)=0<n1≤n2≤⋯≤nr∑n1s1⋯nrsr1,19 with ζr⋆(s1,…,sr)=0<n1≤n2≤⋯≤nr∑n1s1⋯nrsr1,20, injectivity is conjectured (Li, 15 Jun 2026).
Taken together, these developments show that MZSFs are no longer studied only as a star-version of Euler–Zagier sums. They form a nexus joining explicit special-value theory, determinant and tableau formalisms, iterated-integral and generating-function methods, positive-characteristic interpolation, and metric questions about the distribution and coding of zeta-star values themselves.