Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Assistant
AI Research Assistant
Well-researched responses based on relevant abstracts and paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 175 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 54 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 38 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 37 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 108 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 180 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 447 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.5 36 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Mass-Varying Neutrino in sGB Gravity

Updated 3 October 2025
  • The mass-varying neutrino scenario is a model where neutrino masses arise dynamically from a scalar field coupled to both neutrinos and curvature, leading to environmental dependence.
  • In the scalar–Gauss–Bonnet framework, the scalar field’s quadratic coupling to curvature creates position-dependent mass-squared splittings that significantly alter neutrino oscillation patterns.
  • Solar neutrino experiments constrain the model parameters, offering empirical tests for deviations from standard oscillation models and insights into dark matter and dark energy links.

The mass-varying neutrino (MaVaN) scenario posits that neutrinos acquire their masses dynamically through coupling with a scalar field, such that neutrino masses become functions of environmental properties or cosmological time. This concept appears in several contexts, notably in attempts to unify dark matter and dark energy, in models of cosmic acceleration, and in exploring the links between neutrino properties and fundamental scalar fields. In the implementation within the Scalar–Gauss–Bonnet (sGB) gravity framework, the relevant scalar couples non-minimally both to the Gauss–Bonnet curvature invariant and directly to neutrinos, resulting in an effective neutrino mass that is sensitive to the local matter density via its influence on the scalar field profile. Experimental tests, particularly using solar neutrino data, provide constraints on the model parameters and probe the possible influence of gravitational phenomena on neutrino oscillations (Sadjad et al., 1 Oct 2025).

1. Scalar–Gauss–Bonnet Action and Coupling to Neutrinos

The theoretical structure is based on a scalar-tensor theory with the action: S=d4xg[Mp22R12gμνμϕνϕf(ϕ)G+κiϕ2(νˉiνi)+...]S = \int d^4x \sqrt{-g} \Bigg[ \frac{M_p^2}{2} R - \frac{1}{2} g^{\mu\nu} \partial_\mu \phi \partial_\nu \phi - f(\phi) \mathcal{G} + \kappa_i \phi^2 (\bar{\nu}_i \nu_i) + ... \Bigg] where:

  • MpM_p is the reduced Planck mass,
  • RR is the Ricci scalar,
  • G=R24RμνRμν+RμνρσRμνρσ\mathcal{G} = R^{2} - 4 R_{\mu\nu}R^{\mu\nu} + R_{\mu\nu\rho\sigma}R^{\mu\nu\rho\sigma} is the Gauss–Bonnet invariant,
  • f(ϕ)=12ξϕ2f(\phi) = \frac{1}{2}\xi \phi^2 describes the quadratic coupling between the scalar and the GB invariant (with coupling parameter ξ\xi of dimension [length]2[{\rm length}]^2),
  • κiϕ2\kappa_i \phi^2 yields a scalar-field dependent neutrino mass.

Variation of this action produces two crucial ingredients: modification of the field equation for ϕ\phi via the coupling to curvature, and the dependence of the neutrino mass on the scalar field. This structure leads to environmental dependence of neutrino parameters as ϕ\phi responds to local matter and curvature.

2. Environmental Dependence of the Scalar Field and Neutrino Mass

The scalar field satisfies the modified Klein–Gordon equation: ϕGf,ϕ=0\Box \phi - \mathcal{G} f_{,\phi} = 0 with f,ϕ=f/ϕ=ξϕf_{,\phi} = \partial f / \partial \phi = \xi \phi. The solution ϕ(r)\phi(r) depends on the background curvature profile, which is itself determined by the local matter density and geometry. In spherically symmetric static backgrounds (e.g., the Sun’s interior/exterior modeled as Schwarzschild), ϕ(r)\phi(r) is nearly constant and small in high-density environments, increasing to its asymptotic value outside.

The neutrino mass is set by a quadratic dependence: mν,i(r)=κiϕ(r)m_{\nu, i}(r) = \sqrt{\kappa_i} \, \phi(r) Neutrino mass-squared differences acquire an explicit radial dependence: Δm212(r)=Δκ212ϕ^4(r)\Delta m^2_{21}(r) = \Delta \kappa'^{\,2}_{21}\, \hat{\phi}^4(r) where ϕ^(r)=ϕ(r)/ϕin(0)\hat{\phi}(r) = \phi(r)/\phi_{\mathrm{in}}(0) is the normalized scalar profile, and Δκ212\Delta \kappa'^{\,2}_{21} absorbs overall normalization and coupling strength. Thus, the MaVaN framework predicts variable neutrino oscillation parameters in regions with variable matter/curvature.

3. Implications for Neutrino Oscillation Phenomenology

Oscillations are governed by a space-dependent Hamiltonian. In the two-flavor (νeνμ\nu_e \leftrightarrow \nu_{\mu}) basis, the vacuum oscillation term is

Hvac(r)=Δκ212ϕ^4(r)4Eν(cos2θsin2θ sin2θcos2θ)\mathscr{H}_{\mathrm{vac}}(r) = \frac{\Delta\kappa'^{\,2}_{21}\, \hat{\phi}^4(r)}{4E_{\nu}} \begin{pmatrix} -\cos 2\theta & \sin 2\theta \ \sin 2\theta & \cos 2\theta \end{pmatrix}

Matter effects are included as usual via the electron density-dependent potential Vmatter=2GFNe(r)V_{\mathrm{matter}} = \sqrt{2} G_F N_e(r). The key distinction is that ϕ^(r)\hat{\phi}(r) is small and nearly constant deep inside a dense object, suppressing the effective oscillation phase, and increases outside, restoring standard oscillation behavior. The phase accumulated is

Φ21=Δm212(r)2Eνdr=Δκ212ϕ^4(r)2Eνdr\Phi_{21} = \int \frac{\Delta m^2_{21}(r)}{2E_{\nu}}\, dr = \int \frac{\Delta\kappa'^{\,2}_{21} \hat{\phi}^4(r)}{2E_{\nu}}\, dr

This predicts environmental suppression of flavor conversion in dense regions and restoration in lower-density regions, thereby modifying survival probabilities in a manner testable by solar neutrino experiments.

4. Constraints from Solar Neutrino Observations

By confronting the model with solar neutrino data (including measurements from Kamiokande, Super-Kamiokande, SNO, Borexino, etc.), best-fit values for the model parameters are extracted. The analysis employs a least-squares fit to the electron neutrino survival probability as a function of energy,

Pee(Eν)=12[1+cos2θMcos2θ]P_{ee}(E_\nu) = \frac{1}{2}\left[1 + \cos 2\theta_M\, \cos 2\theta\right]

where the effective mixing angle in matter is

tan2θM=sin2θcos2θA\tan 2\theta_M = \frac{\sin 2\theta}{\cos 2\theta - A}

with

A=22GFNeEνΔκ212ϕ^4A = \frac{2\sqrt{2} G_F N_e E_\nu}{\Delta\kappa'^{\,2}_{21} \hat{\phi}^4}

The reliable fit to data places constraints on both ξ\xi (rescaled: ξ=ξ/R2\xi' = \xi/R_\odot^2) and Δκ212\Delta\kappa'^{\,2}_{21}, e.g., ξ7.8×1011\xi' \sim 7.8\times10^{11}, and Δκ2121×1023eV2\Delta\kappa'^{\,2}_{21} \sim 1\times10^{-23}\,{\rm eV}^2, while the condition ϕin(0)108Mp\phi_{\mathrm{in}}(0) \ll 10^{-8} M_p ensures the approximate validity of the Schwarzschild solution for the background metric. The sGB-based MaVaN scenario remains fully consistent with the Large Mixing Angle–MSW paradigm, with deviations potentially accessible to future high-precision studies.

5. Comparison to Standard Mass-Varying Neutrino and Oscillation Models

Unlike standard MaVaN scenarios—where a scalar field is coupled directly to neutrinos, but not to curvature—the sGB framework introduces implicit environmental dependence through the non-minimal curvature coupling. The result is that neutrino masses can adjust to the local gravitational and matter content, providing a richer structure for parameter space searches. The quadratic dependence on the scalar and resulting ϕ^4\hat{\phi}^4 dependence for mass-squared splittings create distinctive oscillation behaviors as functions of local density, distinguishing sGB MaVaNs both from constant-mass and generic MaVaN models.

6. Key Formulas and Theoretical Summary

Formula Meaning Context
G=R24RμνRμν+RμνρσRμνρσ\mathcal{G} = R^2 - 4 R_{\mu\nu}R^{\mu\nu} + R_{\mu\nu\rho\sigma}R^{\mu\nu\rho\sigma} Gauss–Bonnet invariant Scalar-curvature coupling
f(ϕ)=12ξϕ2f(\phi) = \frac{1}{2} \xi \phi^2 Quadratic scalar–GB coupling function Action, sGB term
mν,i(r)=κiϕ(r)m_{\nu, i}(r) = \sqrt{\kappa_i} \phi(r) Scalar field–dependent neutrino mass Neutrino sector term
Δm212(r)=Δκ212ϕ^4(r)\Delta m^2_{21}(r) = \Delta\kappa'^{\,2}_{21}\, \hat{\phi}^4(r) Position-dependent mass-squared splitting Oscillation phenomenology
Φ21=Δm212(r)2Eνdr\Phi_{21} = \int \frac{\Delta m^2_{21}(r)}{2E_\nu} dr Oscillation phase incorporating scalar dependence Observable phase difference
tan2θM=sin2θ/(cos2θA)\tan 2\theta_M = \sin 2\theta/(\cos 2\theta - A) Effective mixing angle in matter, with AA containing ϕ^\hat{\phi}-dependent splitting Survival probability

These formulas collectively illustrate the structure and consequences of MaVaN models in sGB gravity.

7. Implications, Prospects, and Significance

This extension of MaVaN physics to scalar–Gauss–Bonnet gravity links neutrino properties to gravitational curvature, offering new probes of environmental and cosmological neutrino physics. The model’s successful reproduction of standard oscillation phenomenology in appropriate limits, combined with new testable deviations, demonstrates its compatibility with current data and potential for future discovery. Constraints derived from solar neutrino experiments serve both as checks for the sGB framework and as ways to probe possible gravitationally induced neutrino mass variation, providing a nontrivial interface between neutrino phenomenology and modified gravity frameworks (Sadjad et al., 1 Oct 2025).

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (1)
Forward Email Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow Topic

Get notified by email when new papers are published related to Mass-Varying Neutrino Scenario.