Infinitely Divisible Processes Overview
- Infinitely divisible processes are stochastic processes defined by finite-dimensional distributions that decompose into sums of i.i.d. components, characterized by Lévy–Khintchine representations.
- They encompass a broad class including Lévy, moving average, and selfsimilar processes, facilitating advanced analysis in path-space measures and semimartingale decompositions.
- Practical simulation techniques, such as shot-noise series and stochastic integrals, provide explicit error bounds and effective methods for modeling heavy-tailed and dependent structures.
An infinitely divisible process is a stochastic process such that for every integer , every finite-dimensional marginal admits a decomposition as the sum of independent identically distributed processes. This property connects the analysis of path-space measures, Lévy–Khintchine representations, series and integral decompositions, simulation techniques, and links to semimartingales, stable processes, and extremes of dependence.
1. Definition and General Structure
A random vector is infinitely divisible if, for each , there exist i.i.d.\ random variables such that . Every infinitely divisible law admits the Lévy–Khintchine representation: its characteristic function is
with drift , covariance , and Lévy measure satisfying 0 [(Yuan et al., 2021), Section 1].
A stochastic process 1 is infinitely divisible if each finite-dimensional distribution is infinitely divisible. Lévy processes form a central subclass of infinitely divisible processes but the concept encompasses a much broader class including moving averages, selfsimilar processes, and time-changed or subordinated structures [(Yuan et al., 2021); (Hakassou et al., 2012); (Fonseca-Mora, 2017)].
2. Lévy–Khintchine and Lévy–Itô Representations
The infinite divisibility property extends the Lévy–Khintchine formula to path spaces and duals of nuclear spaces. For a process 2, the path-space law is determined by a triplet 3:
- 4: Gaussian covariance.
- 5: path-space Lévy measure on 6 satisfying integrability and regularity conditions.
- 7: drift function.
The finite-dimensional characteristic function is then
8
[(Rosinski, 2016), Sec. 1].
In the dual of a nuclear space 9, one has the Lévy–Khintchine formula for infinitely divisible measures on 0 with drift 1, covariance form 2 on 3, and Lévy measure 4: 5 [(Fonseca-Mora, 2017), Sec. 3].
The Lévy–Itô decomposition gives
6
where 7 is a Gaussian process, 8 is a Poisson random measure, and 9 its compensated version [(Fonseca-Mora, 2017), Sec. 4].
3. Series and Integral Representations
Shot-noise and Ferguson–Klass–Rosiński Series
Any infinitely divisible law with Lévy measure 0 (after suitable decomposition) admits a shot-noise series
1
where 2 are Poisson points, 3 are i.i.d.\ marks, and 4 are centering shifts chosen for convergence. This representation is robust in multivariate and path-space settings, greatly facilitating simulation [(Yuan et al., 2021), Sec. 2].
Truncation after 5 terms yields a residual tail 6, whose mean-square (or higher moment) error can be explicitly evaluated: 7 where 8 is the truncated Lévy measure [(Yuan et al., 2021), Eq. (2)].
Stochastic Integrals and Moving Averages
General process representations are given as
9
where 0 is a Lévy process and 1 is a suitable kernel. For stationary increment mixed moving averages (SIMMA),
2
where 3 is an ID independently scattered random measure and 4 is typically a deterministic kernel (Basse-O'Connor et al., 2012, Basse-O'Connor et al., 2014).
Time-changed and selfsimilar structures arise in additive processes with dilative stability: 5 with 6 itself constructed from an integral with respect to a background process and ultimately leading to a time-changed Lévy process representation [(Bhatti et al., 2016), Sec. 2].
4. Semimartingale and Path Regularity Criteria
A general result for infinitely divisible semimartingales 7 representable as stochastic integrals against infinitely divisible random measures 8: 9 satisfies that 0 is a semimartingale if and only if it admits a unique decomposition
1
where 2 is càdlàg with independent increments (the “martingale” part) and 3 is a predictable, finite variation process,
4
5
(Basse-O'Connor et al., 2012, Basse-O'Connor et al., 2014).
For stationary increment cases (6 a SIMMA), absolute continuity of the kernel in time (with suitable moment and integrability conditions for the jump and Gaussian parts) is necessary and sufficient for finite variation paths (Basse-O'Connor et al., 2012).
5. Sampling and Simulation Techniques
Shot-noise truncation provides efficient, practical sample-path generation:
- Fix truncation parameter 7 (on Poisson intensity or absolute jump size).
- Simulate Poisson number of jumps and their marks.
- For SDEs driven by Lévy noise, a jump-adapted discretization combines exact simulation of jump times with strong-order schemes for drift and diffusion between jumps.
Error control is explicit: for 8-stable processes, the number of jumps 9 required for mean-square error 0 satisfies 1; for tempered or gamma processes, error decays exponentially allowing smaller 2 (Yuan et al., 2021, Kawai, 2021).
Small jumps (with controllable second moment) can be replaced by a Gaussian approximation, reducing computational cost [(Yuan et al., 2021), Sec. 6].
6. Infinitely Divisible Processes with Respect to Time and Extensions
A process 3 is infinitely divisible with respect to time (IDT) if for every 4,
5
where 6 are i.i.d. copies. Each one-dimensional marginal 7 is then classically infinitely divisible, and there exists a unique associated Lévy process with matching marginals [(Hakassou et al., 2012), Sec. 1].
Strong IDT processes admit the stronger property of path decomposition: 8 [(Mai et al., 2018), Sec. 1].
Multiparameter extensions (IDT of type 1 or 2) and weak IDT (equality in law only for fixed 9) extend the theory to a broader class, including classical Gaussian random fields and operator-stable fields (Hakassou et al., 2012).
7. Applications, Examples, and Extreme Models
Representative infinitely divisible processes:
- Fractional Lévy processes: moving averages with fractional kernels driven by Lévy processes, semimartingale if and only if suitable kernel regularity and small-jump moments are satisfied [(Basse-O'Connor et al., 2012); (Basse-O'Connor et al., 2012)].
- Stable and tempered stable Lévy motions: synthesized via LePage or shot-noise series, with simulation and error bounds explicit for heavy-tailed increments (Yuan et al., 2021, Kawai, 2021).
- Non-decreasing (subordinator) ID processes: Min- and max-infinite divisibility, exchangeable sequences with extreme-value and copula structure, constructed using stochastic process analogues of Marshall–Olkin or Archimedean models (Brück et al., 2020, Mai et al., 2018).
- Long-memory stationary infinitely divisible sequences: Ergodic-theoretic representations for heavy-tailed processes, with functional large deviation principles governed by null-recurrence and conservative flows [(Ghosh, 2010); (Owada, 2013)].
Extremal dependence structures, copulas, and the de Finetti-type correspondences further extend the reach of infinitely divisible processes in probabilistic dependence modeling (Brück et al., 2020).
The theory of infinitely divisible processes underpins a wide spectrum of stochastic modeling, simulation, and limit theory. Their path properties—finite variation, semimartingale structure, and regularity—can be characterized through their Lévy–Khintchine triplets and explicit series/integral representations, with robust tools for simulation and broad applicability from stochastic integration to extreme-value analysis and multivariate dependence [(Yuan et al., 2021); (Rosinski, 2016); (Fonseca-Mora, 2017); (Kawai, 2021); (Hakassou et al., 2012); (Brück et al., 2020); (Mai et al., 2018)].